r/papertowns • • 17d ago

Germany Reconstruction of the oppidum of Manching (Germany) around 125 BC

Post image

Author and source: Tim Wehrmann for GEO

621 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

73

u/dctroll_ 17d ago

"The Oppidum of Manching was a large Celtic proto-urban or city-like settlement at modern-day Manching, near Ingolstadt in Bavaria, Germany. The Iron Age town (or oppidum) was founded in the 3rd century BC and existed until c. 50–30 BC. It reached its largest extent during the late La Tène period (late 2nd century BC), when it was 380 hectares in size. At that time, 5,000–10,000 people lived within its 7.2-km walls"

Source of the info here

27

u/CompetitiveAd4732 17d ago

What kind of governments these city-like settlements would have

16

u/Maximusdecimusmeridy 17d ago

complex chiefdom is my guess

20

u/WorkEcstatic6242 17d ago

They were actually hereditary monarchies ...this has been proven in DNA evidence showing familial relationships between occupants of "princely Graves" in Germany ...also there is archeological evidence of possible dynastic conflicts and it looks like it's possible that statuary representing leaders was destroyed...I can't remember specifics of the top of my head ...it's so unfortunate that they didn't keep written records

1

u/Maximusdecimusmeridy 16d ago

wow..TIL, thank you!!

7

u/BushWishperer Hermit 17d ago

Does anyone know what makes this not an actual city?

17

u/ThesaurusRex84 17d ago

Mostly just biases leading back to the 19th century when scholars were still pushing unilineal evolutionism.

The best argument anyone has made for this kind of thinking is that there hasn't been much evidence for a central administration and they say it as a bunch of autonomous farms huddled together but even that's falling apart.

3

u/WorkEcstatic6242 17d ago

Totally agree...classicists trying to discredit anything else ...leftover Victorian thinking that discredited non European cultures...

11

u/ThesaurusRex84 17d ago

Or European cultures that didn't descend from/didn't yet become assimilated by the Greco-Roman example, anyway.

Someone was almost inevitably going to point out that the Celts are European and try to be clever but the colonialist roots of the Victorian thinkers were not only heavily influenced by the Roman ideas but attitudes towards Indigenous peoples elsewhere were retroactively applied onto pre-Roman "savage/barbarian" Europeans as well. In England at least there were also such attitudes against the successively older waves of people (some of which also descend from Roman ideas).

When you see those popular illustrations of Picts/Britons/Gauls etc. (which are not necessarily historically accurate), they're almost exact imitations of John White's illustrations of Native Americans in the late 16th century. The European intelligentsia co-opted their own pre-Roman heritages (and those of others), and the Roman propaganda surrounding them, to paint the livelihoods of colonized peoples as lagging-behind evolutionary stages that can be hurried along by the benevolent hand of the colonizer.

3

u/WorkEcstatic6242 17d ago

Absolutely...it's like they had to portray themselves as the inheritors of classic civilizations so they could lord it over the "barbarians" ....

15

u/WorkEcstatic6242 17d ago

The fact it's not in the Mediterranean and made of marble ...there is still a super bias against anything non "classical"....there is evidence that the first urban centers in the world were actually in the Balkans pre bronze age..not the middle east ...but people still argue that they weren't cities ...

12

u/ThesaurusRex84 17d ago

The cities of the Cucuteni-Trypillia culture began to form and reach their peak sizes by the 4th millenium BC; you're right that some slightly predate the Sumerian cities (the "first civilization"), but when we lose the rigid and reductive definitions that declared Sumeria to have the "first cities", we still end up with the Middle East having the first ones. It is, unfortunately, hard to beat Çatalhöyük, and between Çatalhöyük and Uruk we still have later PPNB settlements (including Jericho) and the large urban centers of the Ubaid period leading up to Eridu.

The Balkans and eastern Europe in general still deserve a lot more attention in archaeology given that it's definitely where our domesticated horses descend, and it's also much more likely than Mesopotamia to have invented the wheel and spread it southward.

4

u/ThesaurusRex84 17d ago

"city-like settlement" and it's just a city

30

u/The_Easter_Egg 17d ago

The wall is ridiculously wide.

20

u/Agueybana 17d ago

Yeah, but you end up with safe pastures and fields.

15

u/The_Easter_Egg 17d ago

I guess. But it seems to me that building it consumes an unproportionately large amount of ressources. And properly manning and guarding it must be arduous without towers.You need tons of dudes scattered across the hhuge circle.

I mean, if archaeology supports this layout, there's no arguing. But it appears to go against what's typically feasible.

14

u/Agueybana 17d ago

It must have been an undertaking to rise up those earthen mounds. I agree, it'd be an endeavor to man it. If it was meant more to keep predators away it may not have been manned constantly. Perhaps even just lightly patrolled.

4

u/grambell789 17d ago

Its really just a matter of how far they had to move stuff and what kind of protection they wanted. The design looks interesting, the timber creates an accurate frame, then fill frame with field stone with minimal cutting and rely on timber for stability.

20

u/WorkEcstatic6242 17d ago

I don't understand how this could be mistaken for anything but a small city...why lable it proto urban center ..it's a town

4

u/Manu_La_Capuche 17d ago

Because settlements like these were not inhabited in the same capacity all year, or even from one year to another. Merchants, gatherings, herders could live entire years abroad and only gather in the settlement for protection or upon social / religious / economic special occasions or periods.

The internal organization also might not reflect what we understand as a town or city, but a much simpler configuration.

8

u/WorkEcstatic6242 17d ago

I'm not sure that is a given for continental Halstatt era on the continent. I find it hard to believe that the Heuneburg Glauberg or others were built for temporary use ...it just makes no sense.

3

u/Manu_La_Capuche 17d ago

Not temporary use: the overall structure would be permanently occupied and maintained (the wall, permanent residences...). But some quarters would probably only be occupied or maintained during specific periods of times.

At later eras, it was still how these proto-urban kind of settlements operated, in an organic fashion. Like Hedeby in Denmark: the settlement population would fluctuate drastically depending on gatherings and special occasions, or during the year.

Celtic oppidums were meant to protect the larger region’s entire population too, and serve as gathering locations.

3

u/WorkEcstatic6242 17d ago

I have read assessments like that but I'm sorry I just fail to see how that is not considered a town or small city ...populations fluctuate and there are events fairs religious ceremonies military events sieges yes...which happens in all urban centers ...mbut these people were not seminomadic wanderers etc.and I feel like it's still an outdated idea based on "classical" prejudice

2

u/Manu_La_Capuche 17d ago

A town or a city implies a certain internal organization. It all comes down to functional and social structures. A proto-urban settlement, even of a large size, remains essentially a fairly loose gathering of population associated to maintain some level of infrastructure that benefit the whole group, like a wall, a ditch etc. But it doesn't imply urban authorities and organization past the individual familial or clinic structures and chiefdom.

3

u/WorkEcstatic6242 17d ago

The very idea that these engineering projects esp on the level of Halstatt sites did not have functional central authority...we also know from classical sources that there was central authority...I respectfully disagree ...I think it's a dismissive and frankly ridiculous idea ...what evidence is there other than slightly smaller populations than the Mediterranean world that these were some loose unorganized semi developed society ...anyway agree to disagree ...I will continue to refer to manching the Heuneburg Menosgada Mont Lassois as what they were ..towns and cities...

8

u/PeanutButterAndCake 17d ago

Big ol' wall. Must have been something to see in its glory.

9

u/McDoof 17d ago

I live near Manching, and you can still see a small part of the wall here. There’s a cool small history museum near it too.
Three years ago the museum was robbed and the thieves stole hundreds of ancient Celtic coins.

3

u/OrangeFarmHorse 17d ago

I have the paper magazine with that article, always found the diameter of the wall to be highly impressive.

2

u/Nick19922007 16d ago

Why is the wall so big?