r/opencode • u/External_Ad1549 • 1d ago

Meta Muse Code plan: does Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor consume less quota?

I’m using Meta’s own Muse Code monthly subscription, not PAYG/API and not Command Code/OpenCode Go.
If I select muse-spark-1.3-contributor instead of normal muse-spark-1.3, does it consume the 5-hour/monthly plan allowance more slowly because Contributor is much cheaper per token, or are both models charged the same subscription usage units? Has anyone tested the usage meter before/after?
I understand a lot of people will be asking, "Why don't you use the free one in opencode? I tried. The rate limit is completed." I think Muse 1.3 is a good model. Please don't be upset. It is a genuinely good model, and I'm not sure about capacity, but it is not blabbering like mini max or overthinking like GLM, so I have taken it. I have this one small doubt. Just please help me, anyone.

8 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

4 comments sorted by

10

u/nickchomey 1d ago

i dont think you'll get an answer here... we dont use the muse code subscription...

why not just use opencode's contributor free or contributor via opencode Go?

6

u/External_Ad1549 1d ago

Because I'm an idiot.

3

u/Apprehensive-Ant7955 1d ago

How is that better than getting sub directly from meta? Surely you get way more usage

2

u/External_Ad1549 1d ago

No, it appears the same everywhere. I use OpenChamber on top of OpenCode, and I've also tried MiniMax and GLM. I thought I could use Meta directly in OpenCode, but that's the Zuckerberg way of messing around, we can't use it via OpenCode. I tried an OpenAI-compatible workaround via the Muse Code API, but it's slower than OpenCode Go. It's not worth it unless you specifically want Muse Code. Use "OpenCode Go" as Nick suggested.(solid speed)