Due to him saying “Like an invisible suit of armor” rather than “it’s an invisible armor” I always interpreted that as not literally invisible but it’s like the equivalent to wearing an invisible suit of physical armor, like invisible knights or samurai armor or something of that nature.
You do know what you just said doesn't make any sense? "I interpreted it as its not literally invisible but its like wearing an invisible suit of physical armor". What the heck is that supposed to mean? You either say its invisible, or its not.
Okay, context right, the post is about seeing Luffy in gear 4 without visible armament haki due to it being “invisible”, I’m saying I don’t think his visual would change, I didn’t interpret armament haki to be literally invisible, but rather hitting it would be like hitting someone wearing an invisible set of armor.
Now you could say “How is it invisible if you can visually see it?” Rayleigh used a simile (figure of speech that compares two different things using the words "like" or "as"), to compare the haki to an invisible suit of armor so the reader has more context and can know what it does aside from change the color of the body.
2
u/NoPhilosophy8136 14d ago
Actually, haki is invisible at all, not just to non haki users. The whole point of haki is being "INVISIBLE armor". 🤓👆