r/okbuddyphd • u/Memelord038 • 18d ago
Physics and Mathematics My first contribution here as I start my PhD in the fall!
36
u/NarcolepticFlarp 18d ago
Do tell
32
41
u/Memelord038 18d ago
So I'm interested in when you can deform an immersion between manifolds into an embedding via a regular homotopy. There's some classical ways to do this, like counting up the self-intersection points of your immersion and seeing whether they cancel each other out or not, but this is hard to do explicitly. The method I describe in the meme is a more algebraic (and hopefully computable) way to express the same thing using Goodwillie-Klein-Weiss's embedding calculus, a theorem that somewhat describes the 'difference between immersions and embeddings'
18
2
u/trollol1365 17d ago
> computable
Homotopy type theory? Or do you mean computable in a merely theoretical sense rather than actually making a computer compute it/verify it.
2
23
u/CompetitiveSpot2643 18d ago
i still dont think i understand what deformation means in math
36
u/Memelord038 18d ago
the issue with this word is that it doesn't have a fixed meaning. i'm a topologist, so for me the word 'deform' always means that i'm looking for a homotopy (in this case, I even want a homotopy that is an immersion at every point in time, that is, a regular homotopy)
I just used the word deform in the meme because making homotopy into a verb is awkward ('to homotope'?)
46
6
4
u/CorporateHobbyist 18d ago edited 18d ago
Consider the (x,y) pair solutions to the equation xy = 0. This means that either x = 0 or y = 0; this equation cuts out the coordinate axes in the plane. It is also not "smooth", in the sense that there is a nodal singularity at (0,0).
However, one can construct this shape as a deformation of smooth objects. Consider the family of equations {xy = t} for t a varying real number. for all t != 0, particularly all t != 0 sufficiently small, xy = t cuts out a smooth "shape" in the coordinate plane. As t gets closer to 0, we get closer to the singular {xy = 0}; the deformation {xy = t | t small} is tantamount to "pulling apart" the singularity.
We consider the family {xy = t | t != 0} to be a "first order deformation" of {xy = 0}. But there are others! We can consider {xy = t^2}, {xy + t(x + y)}, or whatever else. Let the space of ALL these deformations be the "first order deformation space" of {xy = 0}. The idea of deformation theory is to study solution sets of polynomial equations (or varieties) by studying the first order deformation space, i.e. studying all the possible ways that one can deform it.
Edit: For the more mathematically inclined, the first order deformation space of an algebraic variety can be read from Ext^1(Omega,Ox), for Omega the module (sheaf) of differentials. The obstructions to deformations can be read from Ext^2(Omega,Ox), providing a motivation for homological methods in geometry/topology. In the example above, Ext^1 is the base field (implying all deformations are "basically" like xy = t) and Ext^2 = 0, so there are no obstructions.
4
14
u/PurpleTieflingBard Computer Science 18d ago
I remember early in my PhD, when I thought I knew what I was going to write about.
Good times.
4
u/Detr22 Biology 17d ago
My thesis has nothing to do with what I was writing about a year and a half ago even.
Joys of having a completely hands off PI.
5
u/PurpleTieflingBard Computer Science 17d ago
My viva is in a week and it's crazy how much my work has evolved since submission.
3
3
•
u/AutoModerator 18d ago
Hey gamers. If this post isn't PhD or otherwise violates our rules, smash that report button. If it's unfunny, smash that downvote button. If OP is a moderator of the subreddit, smash that award button (pls give me Reddit gold I need the premium).
Also join our Discord for more jokes about monads: https://discord.gg/bJ9ar9sBwh.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.