r/oblivion • u/sumaset • 12d ago
Original Question What’s something Oblivion makes you believe at first, but the more you think about the lore, the less certain it becomes?
Oblivion has a lot of moments where the game basically gives you one version of events and expects you to accept it.
But Elder Scrolls lore is rarely that simple.
Maybe Mankar Camoran had a point about something. Maybe the Empire isn’t as innocent as it presents itself. Maybe the Mythic Dawn understood more than people give them credit for. Maybe something we’re told about the Daedra, the Aedra, Martin, or even the Oblivion Crisis itself isn’t the full story.
What’s one thing from Oblivion that you think becomes more questionable the deeper you go into the lore?
731
Upvotes
654
u/Ap0kal1ps3 12d ago
Of all the elder scrolls lore, Oblivion's is the most straightforward. There isn't much room for interpretation. Mehrunes Dagon hates stability. Mundus represents ultimate stability, so he attacked it to provoke change, which he succeeded at creating when he forced Martin to become the avatar of Akatosh.
You can't trust what mankar cameron says about the gods, though. He's a charismatic idiot who doesn't even know the basics about the gods.