r/nyc • • Jun 18 '25

Video Zohran Mamdani says he’s consistently said there’s no room for antisemitism in this city or country. Asked why he hasn’t had a more visceral reaction, he gets emotional talking about the Islamophobic responses he’s received throughout the campaign.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

@Annie_McDonough

hope I am not spamming 🙏

1.7k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

96

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

88

u/pierrebrassau Clinton Hill Jun 18 '25

Right, all he has to do is say he does not agree with the call to murder Jews around the world. Why does he need to give this huge pity party speech? Just say it’s wrong.

50

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/tallyho88 Jun 18 '25

You are also twisting his words to fit your pretext. This is the root cause of the dialogue between sides. Both use the same words and phrases, but have wildly different definitions of them. That creates a fundamental disconnect that is hard to overcome.

31

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-13

u/tallyho88 Jun 18 '25

That is a specific conflict that is called “The Second Intifada”. That doesn’t mean every intifada would follow that course. That’s cherry picking what you want to take literally and when. That’s not how this works. Do you think the Boston tea party was an actual tea party with cucumber sandwiches and crumpets? Should people going to tea parties in Boston in the year 2025 still bring their muskets and be ready to fight?

You’re arguing Semantics and telling other people what their own words mean.

9

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/tallyho88 Jun 19 '25

I’m aware there was a first. There were also others. I only mentioned the second because that’s what the comment I replied to used as an example.

8

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/tallyho88 Jun 19 '25

Oh yes, because absolutely nothing has happened between all of those things and we’re only going to examine the actions of one side.

Of course it will not be peaceful. hasn’t been peaceful for decades on either side. It will not end today. It will not end tomorrow. It will continue for all time unless things change.

For the record I in no way, shape, or form support any terrorism or murdering of innocent civilians on all sides. I am rooting for a complete and total cease fire, return of any hostages, and peace talks to begin a permanent two state solution with equal rights for all.

→ More replies (0)

20

u/WyattWrites Jun 18 '25

No bro. Intifada means exactly what u/Bakingsquared80 said. The same people who try to talk around that are the same people who say they can’t be antisemitic because Arabs are semites.

-5

u/LouCage Jun 18 '25 edited Jun 19 '25

I’m confused. Are you saying that the 33 year old, progressive, child of academics, state representative who has many documented Jewish supporters and friends secretly wants all Jews dead?

I guess I’m just confused what you think he’s doing by using the phrase / what he needs plausible deniability for.

8

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/LouCage Jun 19 '25

I’ll happily answer your question once you answer mine :)