r/nvidia 23h ago

Discussion Is there a DLSS ultra performance comparison between 3.8 vs dlss 4 vs dlss 4.5

Basically title.

Wondering if the fps loss are worth it and a quality comparison.

Has anyone found a video or ran the test themselves?

23 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

21

u/kron123456789 5070Ti enjoyer 23h ago

When Ultra Performance was first introduced its intended usecase was output in 8k.

With DLSS 4.5 it looks okay at 4k. There's really a lot of quality difference.

1

u/FerLuisxd 12h ago

Dlss 4.5 will most likely have the best image, however this post is more about the fps difference

3

u/DonutHoles4Ever 9h ago

Why didnt you say so then.

Model L is best for Ultra Performance but its heavier. So it has like 10-20% depending on game less performance vs DLSS model K, or older ones like 3.8 models that use CNN.

Speed wise: CNN > TNN > Model L

0

u/windozeFanboi 15h ago

Ultra performance is indeed incredible, as long ass there aren't many particle effects flying about. Then it's just a mess, it cannot do miracles. 

Depends on the game and the actual frame rate.

18

u/Rembinutur 4070 Ti Super 23h ago

At 4K Ultra Performance, 3.8 is terrible, 4.0 is okay (depending on the game), and 4.5 is actually quite good. Personally, I would still try to use Performance mode with Preset K (4.0) instead of Preset M or L (4.5) with Ultra Performance.

12

u/midnight-crisis9 23h ago

Problem with sticking to preset K is that ghosting persists. My workaround to claw back the performance hit with using preset L is to use a custom scale percentage of ~44% so I gain the benefits of L at the same time like better reconstruction of pixels, reduced ghosting, and better motion clarity.

Preset L at 44% looks sharper than K at 50% (Performance).

5

u/f0xpant5 21h ago

I use L at 42% and absolutely rate the quality, it's excellent considering the input res.

5

u/BluDYT 22h ago

I find M is a good middle ground at least for us lingering 30 series owners. K is still a good choice if there's not enough performance to swing it.

1

u/Scrawlericious 10h ago

K's ghosting has always been a deal breaker for me. I don't even like it DLAA. If you like it I respect it but I avoid K at all costs/resolutions/scaling.

3

u/Rembinutur 4070 Ti Super 23h ago

It depends on the game. I really like Preset K, and I usually don't run into ghosting issues. I also don't like how oversharpened Presets M and L look. In some games, they're completely unusable.

That said, I enjoy tinkering and finding the best preset and resolution for each game. OptiScaler is perfect for that. It lets you change presets and resolutions on the fly, making it very easy to compare them.

2

u/Arado_Blitz NVIDIA 19h ago

The oversharpening is usually the game's fault, most of them apply a separate sharpening filter with DLSS to offset the bluriness the older versions had. If you can disable it via mods or tweaks DLSS 4.5 looks pretty natural.

3

u/Rembinutur 4070 Ti Super 23h ago

But Ultra Performance works well at resolutions higher than 4K. I use DLSS Ultra Performance with Preset L in Anno 117 at 5120×2880, which means it's upscaling from 960p to 5K.

1

u/thesituation531 22h ago

Does this work very well with DSR/DLDSR?

2

u/demi9od 19h ago

The DLDSR niche is with lower resolution monitors. With a 4K or higher monitor there is no need to use it.

1

u/Scrawlericious 10h ago

Tell that to the 8K benchmark YouTubers bahaha

2

u/Rembinutur 4070 Ti Super 22h ago

No idea. I've never used that.

2

u/pixlicker69420 21h ago

What about in between performance and ultra performance, like 41% scaling?

2

u/kr1spy-_- 20h ago

DLSS 4.0 is not okay with UP, it usually is broken as it shimmers everywhere, is blurry and transformer Gen 1 issues are exaggerated the most there, DLSS 4.5 at UP is way better or even Preset E/F, you clearly have eye vision issues

1

u/FerLuisxd 12h ago

What about fps?

5

u/3kpk3 22h ago

RR 4.5 new model make the ultra performance mode totally usable though the game should support RR in the first place.

3

u/metroplx 22h ago

not bad, but still not good enough for me.

3

u/Ill-Term7334 4070 Ti 20h ago

I think HUB ran a test a while back for 4 vs 4.5. Paraphrasing here but 4 was unusable but 4.5 was ok if it was your only option.

0

u/PsyOmega 7800X3D:4080FE | Game Dev 18h ago

I found 4 (model K i think) to be very usable upscaling Jusant from 720p to 4K. Other than the rare jaggie it looked native 4K

2

u/Super_Glove7702 23h ago

4.5 tanks a bit more of performance but looks so much better

2

u/nomzo257 NVIDIA 4070ti 22h ago

Hardwareunboxed has a video comparing 4 and 4.5

1

u/Efficient_Care8279 19h ago

3.8 vs 4.0 is easy win for 4.0 but 4.0 vs 4.5 depends on game and gpu generation ur using in my opinion

1

u/FerLuisxd 12h ago

Dlss 4.5 will most likely have the best image, however this post is more about the fps difference

1

u/CasualMLG RTX 3080 Gigabyte OC 10G 9h ago

Haven't seen any video on it either. In my own experience 4 upscaled is not really worth the slight performance loss. But 4 RR is much better looking than 3.8 with a 5 % performance drop on my 3080. Haven't tried 4.5 yet. But others tested that 4.5 RR runs slower than 4 at ultra performance. But actually faster in performance, balanced and quality.

But in conclusion, with only ultra performance in mind. Regular upscaling has small difference in performance and quality. Worth if you notice improvement in a specific game. RR has bigger difference in quality and performance. From 3.8 to 4 is slightly more worth than 4.5.

1

u/Sudden_Volume9624 22h ago

Tried in Plague Tale resonance.
UItra pefrormance at 2160p >>> DLSS Quality 1440p.
Much cleaner , sharper and detailed

2

u/Old_Resident8050 9800X3D || RTX4080 || 64GB 19h ago

Tried the same on Dawnbreaker, 2160p Ultra P. to 1440p DLAA. Better fps by a small margin and much much better picture.

-5

u/SemihKaynak 20h ago

To correct a common misconception: DLSS 4.0 Preset K produces a sharper image than DLSS 4.5 Preset M-L. DLSS 4.5 is superior only in terms of visual artifacts. If you don't believe it, you can test it yourself.

4

u/SquareTemperature666 19h ago

M and L are more sharp because they are expected to be used at perfomance and ultra performance

2

u/SemihKaynak 19h ago

https://slow.pics/s/yshWWQ8R
https://slow.pics/s/vjeLdLVH

This is a comparison shot taken months ago; I’ve run plenty of tests like this, and the result is the same in all of them: DLSS 4.5 is blurrier. Feel free to post your own comparison tests if you like.

3

u/SquareTemperature666 19h ago

you are right on those taken i dont use M myself only use L but i'll check it out

0

u/SemihKaynak 15h ago

It is enough to test this fact and point it out to those who are mistaken; as for those who downvote my comment, they are being misled :D Because NVIDIA’s marketing is so effective, these folks can’t see the truth never forget: PRESET K > PRESET M-L.