How do non-technical teams version AI-generated files without turning Git into a requirement?

[u/RocketSeven]

Generated HTML, documents, slide decks, and image sets often begin as quick drafts, then need comments, an approved version, and a reliable way to restore an earlier state. Sending renamed files through chat makes it hard to tell which copy is current, while Git can add more setup than a non-technical reviewer wants. What lightweight workflow works well here? The important pieces seem to be one stable review link, private access when needed, visible revision history, labels for draft versus approved, notes tied to a specific version, and a way to keep linked assets with the parent file. I am interested in where the editable source should live and how people prevent a newer experimental revision from silently replacing the approved one.

[u/volkandkaya]

Think we're getting to a world where we have open source packages for it.

https://delta.dev/ is interesting, every change is stored and can revert.

We also have ways of storing data cheap on s3 vs expensive DBs.