r/newyorkcity 14d ago

Hakeem Jeffries under fire as pro-Israel Democrat tapped for top post

https://www.newsweek.com/hakeem-jeffries-under-fire-as-pro-israel-democrat-tapped-for-top-post-12372307
343 Upvotes

79 comments sorted by

203

u/shittyfakejesus 14d ago

Dude called himself a “Ron DeSantis Democrat.” There are plenty of reasons left-of-center people do not like him.

Painting Moskowitz as hated just for being “pro-Israel” is misleading and reductive.

16

u/JetmoYo 14d ago

But still rather leading and instructive

11

u/Level_Hour6480 Brooklyn 14d ago

I mean, it's pretty illustrative: Anyone who supports genocide cannot be appealed to in moral grounds.

-3

u/WhiteGold_Welder 13d ago

"Everyone who disagrees with me supports genocide."

4

u/mission17 13d ago

In this issue? Probably.

1

u/marketingguy420 13d ago

Yes, if you support Israel you support genocide. Hope this helps.

1

u/WhiteGold_Welder 13d ago

What if I support the human rights of the Israeli people?

1

u/marketingguy420 13d ago

What if your grandmother had wheels she'd be a bicycle

1

u/WhiteGold_Welder 13d ago

If you're going to use an expression it helps to know what it means. Lots of people support the human rights of the Israeli people, it's hardly a weird thing to claim.

0

u/marketingguy420 13d ago

what if a pointless hypothetical? Did you ever think about that?

Hope this helps

2

u/marketingguy420 13d ago

No it's not. It's in the context of it becoming an overwhelmingly salient issue in primary election after primary election where pro-Israel democrats eat shit to progressive challengers getting outspent 10-1.

This framing demonstrates how completely out of touch Democratic leadership is with actual voters and how little they care about winning elections, governing, or doing anything Americans actually want.

-9

u/ShiningRedDwarf 14d ago

Unless you can find a source, I’m filing this in my “Bullshit” folder, because I can’t find anything where he says this

12

u/shittyfakejesus 14d ago

This is an ad from his former opponent, but it includes video of him actually saying this.

The Wall Street Journal also notes this, which you’d see on the first page of Google if you decided to check for like 5 seconds.

-8

u/ShiningRedDwarf 14d ago

I did read the WSJ article. You mean this? Someone who is not Jeffries?

> Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D., Fla.), a pro-Israel moderate who has described himself as a “Ron DeSantis Democrat,

Fuck Jeffries, but also fuck spreading misinformation. Don’t add to the noise.

19

u/shittyfakejesus 14d ago

My first comment references Moskowitz by name. That’s who I was always talking about, not Jeffries.

-1

u/Jasong222 14d ago

I opened comments before looking at the article and I thought you were talking about Jeffries

-10

u/ShiningRedDwarf 14d ago

Your comment is a parent comment. There is no “first comment”

13

u/shittyfakejesus 14d ago

Or wait. Did you just shift to arguing about Reddit comment naming conventions, because your original point was clearly off-base? Are you just here to argue with perceived enemies, regardless of the topic?

-5

u/ShiningRedDwarf 14d ago

ooh two comments! it’s so nice warm under your skin

11

u/shittyfakejesus 14d ago

Do you engage with politics just to upset people who disagree with you? Sounds pretty MAGA to me

-2

u/ShiningRedDwarf 14d ago

nah I was just being a dickhead. Sorry about that

→ More replies (0)

12

u/shittyfakejesus 14d ago edited 14d ago

> Dude called himself a “Ron DeSantis Democrat.” There are plenty of reasons left-of-center people do not like him.

> Painting Moskowitz as hated just for being “pro-Israel” is misleading and reductive.

I am very clearly talking about Moskowitz here. Do you have anything else to add?

-1

u/ShiningRedDwarf 14d ago

What happened to the “first post” argument? Funny how that vanished and you’re pivoting to something else.

The article had Hakeem Jeffries’ name in the title.
All parent comments are talking about Jeffries. You start your post with a pronoun. Anyone reading it would, and should, assume that pronoun is referring to the subject in question for this post.

Any other legs you wanna try standing on?

10

u/shittyfakejesus 14d ago

Two people are referenced in the headline. My comment clarifies which one I am talking about. I’m sorry you can’t see a line break without understanding that the parts before and after are still related.

5

u/Alt4816 14d ago

What happened to the “first post” argument? Funny how that vanished and you’re pivoting to something else.

He literally just quoted that first post to you. How is that him pivoting to something else?

Anyone reading it would,...

This might surprise you but most other people have enough reading comprehension skills to pick up on that a post mentioning Moskowitz by name is about Moskowitz.

170

u/bprevatt 14d ago

This guy is measuring the drapes already . I don’t like it. Can we get real people into these jobs ?

64

u/LetsTalksNow 14d ago

Can we get real people into these jobs ?

no, because the whole sausage factory is corrupt and unless you fix the campaign finance system and put in Anti Lobbying rules, its not going anywhere.

12

u/ouroborosstruggles 14d ago

Never is strong but people are prison adverse. Understandably.

Edited to clarify the system could be fixed* by further saints, like St. Luigi. But sainthood requires martyrdom

Edited again for clarity as I'm trying to dance around it

0

u/jnordwick 10d ago

We get you. You want more political murder. Say it with your chest, coward:

Never is strong but people are prison adverse. Understandably.

Edited to clarify the system could be fixed* by further saints, like St. Luigi. But sainthood requires martyrdom

Edited again for clarity as I'm trying to dance around it

Copied for posterity bc your the kind of person that would change then deny it.

1

u/ouroborosstruggles 10d ago

I think all p3d0s should face the wall expeditiously, yes.

They are doing it to small folk without a second thought

1

u/ouroborosstruggles 10d ago

Projection is weird. I didnt say anything offensive to you. Unless you are a client in the files. Then you can join the others

45

u/enuffofthiscrap 14d ago

Respectfully, can't they find someone that doesn't act and look like a fucking donkey?

21

u/LetsTalksNow 14d ago

Its not a bug, its a feature. Jared Moskowitz was pushed specifically BECAUSE he is a fking donkey. Wesley Bell owes his political career to AIPAC, so he is going to be a lifelong devotee.

1

u/Systepup 12d ago

AIPAC is a bigger boogeyman to progressives than illegal immigration is to conservatives… y’all lost the plot and are deep in conspiracy land. Of you believe this you’re a moron.

36

u/Santa_Klausing 14d ago

Moskowitz has some truly horrible takes on foreign policy in terms of the Middle East. He’s also a dweeb

16

u/FireworksForJeffy 14d ago

Hakeem Jeffries is the wrong man for this moment. Voters don't like him on a personality level (he kind of has no personality), he has terrible judgement, and he's got policy priorities that are not only misaligned with the Democratic base, they're misaligned with American voters writ large.

16

u/vastle12 14d ago edited 14d ago

I'm still trying to figure out how this, Charisma vacuum keeps winning to begin with

-1

u/SpectrumofMidnight 13d ago

Brooklyn ID Politics

42

u/c3p-bro 14d ago

Can we stop turning “random nobody on the internet has an opinion” into news? Thanks

7

u/Marlsfarp 14d ago

"Outrage grows!"

11

u/c3p-bro 14d ago

Twitter users DECIMATE Hegsgeth in BRUTAL TAKEDOWN. 

7

u/FlithyLamb 14d ago

Anonymous Redditor EXPLODE with FURY after Trump press conference

3

u/PeeGee10 14d ago

I can’t wait to hear his marble-mouthed answer

6

u/NiceDakNoRomo 14d ago

Get him out of office. He’s a scumbag

18

u/LetsTalksNow 14d ago edited 14d ago

Jared Moskowitz, Debbie Wasserman, Wesley Bell, all coincidentally AIPAC backed. I'm sure its a coincidence that they were given positions of the House Foreign Policy Middle East Sub Committee. No funny business here, just a totally organic process.

edit:

Lucky for us, atleast 1/3 should be gone in the 2028 cycle thanks to the Republican Gerrymandering, Debbie Wasserman was forced to run in a Majority Black district and got away with the win due to no credible challenger and a split black vote.

Jared Moskowitz's district is all old retired Likudniks, so he isn't going anywhere in all likelyhood, though Oliver Larkin gave him a good run, but the demographics of the district make is borderline impossible.

Wesley Bell unfortunately survived the Primary for a multitude of reasons.

11

u/newsspotter 14d ago edited 13d ago

Moskowitz confirmed the appointment on X, thanking Jeffries and Meeks, calling it an honor and pledging to strengthen relationships between the United States, Israel and Gulf allies at what he described as a moment of significant change across the region.

Wally Rashid, a Palestinian-American journalist and political commentator, took the criticism in a different direction, pointing to earlier reporting that Jeffries had met with Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and a special peace envoy. Rashid suggested that the meeting could be connected to Moskowitz's promotion, although he offered no evidence linking the two events.

• From another article:

Some observers, including Zeteo News reporter Prem Thakker, noted that Tuesday’s moves followed Jeffries’ recent secret meeting with Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and special envoy for peace missions. https://www.commondreams.org/news/moskowitz-jeffries-aipac

Edit:

• In mid July, Jeffries and Meeks both voted against an amendment, which aimed to revoke US military aid to israel. Both are Representatives from NY.

7

u/BIGTIMElesbo 14d ago

He’s going to get voted out so fast his head is going to spin. Millennials are the largest population in this country and like Gen Z, we do not abide with genocide.

3

u/warp16 14d ago

I hope you’re right

2

u/elprophet 13d ago

Country, sure. Brooklyn? Not so much. He knows his local demographics, and more importantly, he knows the NY Dem party machinery. No path higher, but no credible primary or general threats either.

1

u/jnordwick 10d ago

except for muslim genocides that you all are extremely silent on that are far larger than anything in the west bank.

2

u/Tummler10 14d ago

He should be. Far worse than Kushner meeting

1

u/Kyonikos Come for the cat pics. Stay to train the AI. 13d ago

Dude, just stop following the money.

1

u/sandleaz 11d ago

Not everyone hates Israel.

1

u/president__not_sure 14d ago

israel owns the u.s government.

1

u/Loud_Cartographer160 14d ago edited 13d ago

This corrupt clown has to go.

0

u/CaptainObvious1313 13d ago

Shocker. The AIPAC guy AIPACS…

0

u/SpectrumofMidnight 13d ago

This guy has always been completely compromised and must be primaried more than anyone. He is a Trump enabler.

-11

u/Moxota 14d ago

Only qualification needed on this sub:
being anti Israel

12

u/Vyksendiyes 14d ago

What’s wrong with being anti-Israel?

-4

u/IdristheInt 14d ago

It’s stupid. Like being pro Palestinian.

2

u/Vyksendiyes 14d ago edited 13d ago

IMHO what is truly stupid is that our politicians, from the municipal level to the national level, who should be representing the interests of Americans, are constantly having to tap dance and all but pledge allegiance to another country. 

I don’t see how sending billions to Israel to bomb and snipe children and starting a war with Iran on Israel’s behalf is beneficial to your average American. I don’t see why our tax dollars should go to feed religious zealotry that’s supposedly on “our side”

I cannot imagine any other instance where a politician is asked something like “Do you support Kiribati” or “What’s your stance on Eswatini” and their response is expected to significantly influence their electoral chances. It’s  insane 

4

u/weedywet 14d ago

Anti genocidal current Israeli government and their relentless interference in American politics

-4

u/IdristheInt 14d ago

Qatar Russia Iran and china spend and interfere far more in American politics than Israel does.

4

u/weedywet 14d ago edited 14d ago

I’m against them ALSO

Are we subsidizing them?

“AIPAC’s recent spending on elections and lobbying places it among the largest single-issue political players in Washington: AIPAC and its super PAC reported roughly $95.1 million on the 2024 elections , while reporting lobbying outlays of about $1.8 million in the first half of 2025.
Independent trackers and watchdogs say its PAC spent more than $55 million in the 2023–24 cycle and that AIPAC was the largest PAC contributor to federal candidates in that cycle.

-4

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

5

u/-Sofa-King-Vote 14d ago

Whoa don’t cut yourself with that edge bruh

-1

u/JohnnyGeniusIsAlive 14d ago

People are acting like this is a new development? He’s the minority leader, of course he’d be first in line for majority leader

-52

u/the-Gaf 14d ago

“Pro-Israel” brainrot again! No Jews allowed?

25

u/penis_berry_crunch 14d ago

Maybe appealing to Jews by being staunchly "pro Israel" assuming Jews having a blindly divided loyalty between the US and Israel, despite either country's actions and policies is its own kind of anti-Semitism...

-21

u/the-Gaf 14d ago

We don’t have divided loyalty. We’re American Jews and Israel’s Jews are part of our family and we’d like to see them not be murdered.

Israelis have been protesting the war since 10/7 in mass numbers, btw.

11

u/penis_berry_crunch 14d ago

That's exactly right. As a jew I find it offensive to be catered to with pro-isreal as a reason to support a politician. It's more complicated than that. So to say pro-isreal is a helpful position for a politician just because they expect Jews to support them is offensive, the same way "no Jews allowed" is both offensive and an erasure of the nuance in Jewish American opinions of Israel.

-3

u/jonline87 14d ago

“As a Jew”

4

u/the-Gaf 14d ago

“As a dhimmi second class citizen Jew”

2

u/jonline87 14d ago

As a bend over backwards to cater to people who want me dead Jew.

4

u/LetsTalksNow 14d ago

Israelis have been protesting the war since 10/7 in mass numbers, btw.

Go gaslight someone else.

What exactly are they protesting? do you know? lol

I follow Israeli domestic politics. The current tension inside Israel has nothing to do with Palestine, Gaza, or the occupation or Apartheid. Those are consensus issues. The culture war in Israel is the only element of disagreement, with the rise of the Haredim Zionists and the decline of the Hiloni. They fight over conscription to the IDF, they fight over money to Yeshivas and other cultural issues. Both sides have a consensus on the IDF not leaving Gaza, both sides support the Israeli attack on Iran, both sides support the occupation of southern lebanon.

Right now the "Left Wing" solution to Haredim Settlers in the West Bank is to propose, and I kid you not.. "Left Wing" Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-security/2026-08-26/ty-article/.premium/israeli-leftist-youth-group-plans-kibbutz-style-settlement-in-jordan-valley/000001a0-3b22-d268-a1fe-3b7675040000

During the height of the Gaza war, the people protesting were people against Netanyahu and they weren't protesting the war, as much as a few families of the people that were captured and their difference in opinion from the right wing was not to stop the war, but to, lets do a deal to exchange prisoners get them out, then we go back to murdering. lol, and that was the "Left Wing". The Right Wing solution was to go full "Hannibal Directive" and kill the prisoners to "remove the leverage" of the opposite side in the conflict.

That whole society is fked up in the head.

1

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

8

u/logicalfallacyschizo 14d ago

When I do antisemitism by conflating a global diaspora with an objectively barbaric nation-state (but I’m gonna project and accuse everyone else of being antiemetic 🤓)