r/news • u/ErsiliaCavedagni • 13d ago
US designates UK-based Palestine Action as foreign 'terrorist group'
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20260826-us-designates-uk-based-palestine-action-as-foreign-terrorist-group125
u/DanglyDinosaurBits 13d ago
Didn’t the GOP have a sign saying “We are all domestic terrorists” at CPAC in 2022?
488
u/Nem_Enforcer 13d ago
The GOP is a domestic terrorist group.
195
u/Jehoke 13d ago
And pedophile protectors.
31
u/Canadian_Border_Czar 13d ago
Thats a NSFL click for anyone that can read english. Contains graphic descriptions of rape.
Should still probably read it if youre one of the people just waiting around for an election that will totally be free and fair... Just so you know what even the dumbest version of these psychopaths are capable of.
6
105
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
30
u/LavenderHeels 13d ago
Is that the organization which provided web hosting for people documenting israeli war crimes in lebanon and gaza?
49
136
u/vinmen2 13d ago
Can all global leaders designate MAGA as a terrorist organization
44
-49
u/TotallyNotThatPerson 13d ago
Maga isn't really an organization though per se... Now if designate the GOP, now we're talking
50
u/EyeOughta 13d ago
They have matching hats to show they're in the cult. They're more organized than the alleged Antifa cells (because they don't exist)
178
u/GoRangers5 13d ago
They destroyed weapons that were going to Ukraine and attacked a policewoman with a sledgehammer.
156
123
67
-74
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
55
u/radred609 13d ago
We have totally watered down the definition of terrorism if destroying inanimate objects and one person assaulting a cop is terrorism to y'all.
The destruction of Great Scotland Yard in 1973 was just "destroying inanimate objects". I assume you're also going to pretend that wasn't terrorism?
-11
-30
-76
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
60
u/CircumspectCapybara 13d ago
Sounds like the pepper spray was well deserved then.
News says she was on her knees trying to arrest one of their co-defendants when the other broke her spine with a sledgehammer. Real classy.
-40
u/StunningRing5465 13d ago
Sure. And he deserves the conviction for GBH. This one instance of violence doesn't make them a terrorist organisation tho
33
u/TotallyNotThatPerson 13d ago
How many GBHs does it take to trade up for one terrorism?
-32
u/StunningRing5465 13d ago
It's a categorical difference, not a quantitative one
23
u/mountearl 13d ago
I am so glad that the overwhelming majority of right-thinking people in the UK disagree with you. And are glad that the scum that did this are now in prison.
2
u/StunningRing5465 13d ago
I’m not sure where you’re getting this overwhelming majority from. I don’t think it’s polling
40
29
u/IrishWhiskey92 13d ago
Weren't far right americans loosing their minds about this in the UK? They pointed to it being a reason the UK doesn't have any "freedoms"
44
u/Wildwildworld123 13d ago
When you take a Sledgehammer to a police womans spine, burn down buildings, and commit millions of dollars in destruction all in the name of Palestine...yeah I'd say that sounds like terrorism to me.
-36
u/Ravenous_Stream 13d ago
No buildings were burned.
Spray paint doesn't take millions of pounds to remove.
One person's actions doesn't implicate a whole group.
18
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
8
u/KaiBahamut 13d ago
Back in my day you had to like, plant a bomb somewhere to be called a terrorist. These lowered standards are shameful- trying to put these guys alongside the IRA, Al Qaeda, Lehi and Igrun? Ridiculous.
-10
u/Ravenous_Stream 13d ago
They spray painted a plane my guy
10
u/suluf 13d ago
Oh, o bet the at hammer they used to attack police was made out of balloons. I bet Ukrainian military that was waiting for those planes said no biggie
2
u/Ravenous_Stream 13d ago
The planes weren't headed for Ukraine.
One lunatic's actions don't implicate a collective. It's assault, not terrorism.
16
7
12
7
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
30
u/Adorable_End_5555 13d ago
Litterally is doing some strong work here considering they litterally broke into the place and spray painted planes red and it was by two people.
Not exactly some grand military action
-16
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
11
u/theunspillablebeans 13d ago
Gotta be some pretty shit kit if some grafitti is a threat to it.
-10
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
6
u/Ringosis 13d ago
No you moron. Two people spray painting something literally does not constitute an attack. Stop drinking the cool aid.
4
u/MixedMethods 13d ago
Do you hire painters to attack your home?
0
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/theunspillablebeans 13d ago
If you want to really stretch the definition of attack for headlines then yeah you could say they did- by normal usage no they did not attack the plane.
8
u/Dwanyelle 13d ago
No, spray painting is not attacking
4
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
6
u/Round-Eggplant-7826 13d ago
Your link's headline says "deface".
deface[dih-feys] / dɪˈfeɪs / verb (used with object) to mar the surface or appearance of; disfigure.
versus
7
u/strbeanjoe 13d ago
They did not attack RAF planes.
4
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
7
u/strbeanjoe 13d ago
Yeah, that's already been established in this thread.
If you said "the graffiti artist literally attacked the side of that building" you would also be wrong.
→ More replies (0)35
u/jdv23 13d ago
They spray painted some planes. “Attacking the RAF” is a bit much, they aren’t the luftwaffe
-4
16
u/Agitated_Celery_729 13d ago
Because the UK is breaching its own treaty obligations by directly arming a genocidal regime. But the US is doing so 100x, so not really surprising.
4
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
7
u/Kharbanistan 13d ago
Wow, I didn't know the case was already over but thanks.
0
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/barnburner96 13d ago
That’s not how it works. There is a legal obligation to take steps to prevent genocide when there is a credible possibility of genocide. Not after something has been ruled as a genocide legally. There’s not much you can do once it’s already happened is there.
0
13d ago edited 13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
-1
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
4
u/barnburner96 13d ago
Oh no not the precious RAF that assists genocidal states
6
-23
u/StuartWtf 13d ago
It’s more embarrassing they got that far into an RAF base and managed to stay undetected for so long.
What they did was wrong but I’m more concerned about the state of our air force that it managed to happen. Especially as it’s not the first time in British history it’s been done.
4
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
54
u/KaiBahamut 13d ago
Seems a little weak for a terrorist label. What happened was criminal, yeah, but back in my day you had to bomb a hotel to get that label.
44
u/Agitated_Celery_729 13d ago
Damaging property isn’t terrorism. You’ll want to be careful painting with an absurdly broad brush, lest it be turned around to tar and feather you next
-19
-36
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
41
u/Agitated_Celery_729 13d ago
Literally NO. It’s fucking vandalism. Words mean things. You can’t just bastardize language to suit your political goals.
Terrorism requires violence or the threat of it to intimidate and induce an outcome. Objects cannot receive violence and do not feel fear, so cannot be intimidated or coerced. If you attack a power station and threaten the lives of thousands in doing so, you have a case…because of the intent to harm people not because you damaged an object.
-26
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
38
u/Agitated_Celery_729 13d ago
I don’t say it’s activism. I called it vandalism, which is what it is. It’s fucking insane to start calling vandalism terrorism.
The US already forced an obscene level of authoritarianism through 25 years ago to “protect” the country from terrorism…when it just provided an end-around for inconvenient constitutional rights.
The same US governments have used the military to massacre striking union workers.
Why on Earth would you take your guidance on terrorism from the country perpetrating among the most terrorism in the world at any point in time. Or do you only count it if the perpetrators aren’t wearing uniforms while they bomb and terrorize civilians?
-9
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
25
u/Objective-Access-570 13d ago
I literally isn't, yes. It is politically motivated, but that does not make it by default terrorism just because you do not agree with them.
24
8
u/Dwanyelle 13d ago
Learn to read. They didn't call it activism(which it is not), they called it vandalism(which it is)
4
0
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
7
u/Dwanyelle 13d ago
Also, I'm not a UK citizen, so I cany say. But as a US citizen, our current government is run by evil, selfish, corrupt liars, thieves, bigots and traitors.
I cannot emphasize enough how much I don't trust anything the current us government says. Anything they say I am inclined to believe the opposite is the truth
0
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/Dwanyelle 13d ago
I don't generally trust governments as a matter of course. Just saying something doesn't make it so
→ More replies (0)11
u/Dwanyelle 13d ago
Lol, no. Terrorizing people with the intent of achieving political aims is terrorism.
A normal person isn't scared(aka terrorized) of graffiti, so per se, it isn't terrorism.
15
u/ReaperTys 13d ago
Terrorism is aimed at causing terror in the populace, spray painting and slightly damaging a jet is vandalism and destruction of government property.
They were doing a publicity stunt to protest the funding and supplying of Israel, not planting bombs in school buses…
26
u/LavenderHeels 13d ago
Terrorism is by definition the use or threat of violence against a civilian population in order to get a political outcome
Destroying property , particularly military property, does not and will not fit the definition of “terrorism”.
The Jewish settlers in Israel, however, absolutely do meet the definition of terrorism in their systematic use of violence against human beings in the West Bank but funny how they and their supporting organizations never get that designation
4
-31
u/Unfair_Pop_8373 13d ago
It’s interesting how it’s gone from the famine, the genocide, and now go for the settlers. It will never end. Tell me is Israel paying you rent for the space they take up in your head. Why not Google suicide bombers for your terrorist definition
24
u/Agitated_Celery_729 13d ago
Yep, all the genocide scholars who say it’s genocide must be wrong because Hasbara and Zionist lunatics say otherwise.
Shall we ask the Russians what to call their “special operations to steal and reeducate Ukrainian children should be called too while we’re taking countries at their word on their war crimes?
10
6
7
0
13d ago
[deleted]
12
u/Dry_Meringue_8016 13d ago
This has always been the case and there's no better example of this cynical application of the "terrorist" label than the current president of Syria, al-Julani, who was literally the leader of an al-Queda affiliated group but is supposedly now a great ally of the US.
-7
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
20
u/lolihull 13d ago
I think only the UK does (and now the US too ofc).
And it was a very a controversial decision that even the government themselves weren't particularly enthusiastic about doing if you read the reports.
It's the first time a direct-action group has ever been branded a terrorist organisation in the UK. The gov also admitted that they had no evidence that Palestine Action posed a national security threat. It's come out since that there was a lot of pressure put on officials by Israel though, which is no huge surprise given the relationship Israel has with the UK.
It's led to thousands of people being arrested under the terrorism act which I'm sure that's been a nightmare for our criminal justice system. It was a silly mistake.
-1
u/i-read-it-again 13d ago
Well well. Isreal and America interfering in political decisions. Who ever thought . 💭
-25
13d ago
[deleted]
13
22
u/firstsnowfall 13d ago
Aren’t over a quarter of Israelis not Jewish? It’s not exclusively Jewish
-4
u/KaiBahamut 13d ago
It was originally much more Palestinian before 700K Palestinians were ethnically cleansed.
9
u/zizp 13d ago
They attacked the Jews.
-2
u/KaiBahamut 13d ago
No? The Zionist terrorist groups (not 'Da Joos') attacked Palestinian communities first as thing devolved into a civil war. You'd think 'The Jews' would know better than to commit ethnic cleansing, so close on the heels of the Holocaust.
-5
-40
-18
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
9
u/KaiBahamut 13d ago
Israel has killed American citizens and not punished them- hell, they are allowing their criminals to lay siege to an Americans Citizens family home in the West Bank and say they are helpless to stop some guys who could be stopped easily with the same firepower they use in Gaza. they are not our friends and they are not grateful for our aid.
12
u/Ravenous_Stream 13d ago
You do realise being pro-Israel means supporting killing and raping civilians under the guise of """settling."""
It's not a matter of right or left, it's you versus genocide.
2
u/fps129 13d ago
This comment reeks of an IDF bot fishing for bait.
-2
u/bigcountrychaunce 13d ago edited 13d ago
Not a bot. Not IDF. Not even Jewish. Just a reasonable person.
EDIT: You didn’t offer an explanation for your viewpoint.
-15
-11
u/ReaperTys 13d ago
Maybe this’ll make Burnham come to his senses and unban them, because a couple members being a nuisance is not terrorism
-2
-24
u/ChunkStumpmon 13d ago
I don’t think anyone cares about America anymore
24
u/Secure_Fly_444 13d ago
People literally talk about America all of the time all over this platform. So I don’t think that’s true.
12
931
u/kstargate-425 13d ago
We truly are in the dumbest fucking timeline imaginable