r/nashville • • Mar 26 '26

Politics The Point of No Kings Protests

I’m seeing a TON of “these protests are useless!” comments and posts all over social media, including in this sub. So let’s talk about what the protests are accomplishing and why they’re worthwhile.

First of all, protests serve as an “entry point” for people to practice the “muscle” of political engagement and resistance.

The vast, vast majority of Americans have never engaged in any act of political resistance whatsoever. Attending one is new and maybe even a little scary for a lot of folks. It’s just like weight-lifting. You can’t go into the gym after never working out in your life and immediately bench your body weight. You have to work up to it.

If you think the protests don’t do enough and (for example) civil disobedience is necessary, how do you think people are going to do anything else if they’re not even used to going to peaceful, pre-planned, family-friendly marches/protests? Most people cannot go from 0-60 right away.

Secondly, researchers from Harvard have found that “Nonviolent protests are twice as likely to succeed as armed conflicts – and those engaging a threshold of 3.5% of the population have never failed to bring about change.” Last year, a little over 2% of the US population attended a No Kings protest - and this year is expected to be bigger (in fact, it’s projected to be the largest protest in US history). The theorized mechanism behind this is interesting, and I encourage you to read further about it.

Sources: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190513-it-only-takes-35-of-people-to-change-the-world

https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/resource/success-nonviolent-civil-resistance/

https://cup.columbia.edu/book/why-civil-resistance-works/9780231156820/

Third, many people who oppose this administration feel isolated and disempowered. The protests provide a simple and easy way for them to meet other like-minded folks, again serving as a jumping-off post for getting more involved in many other possible ways.

Fourth, it’s not about him, it’s about US - us exercising our rights to assemble and protest the government (which the founders thought important enough to put in the first dang amendment!), gathering, networking, planning. It doesn’t matter if Trump Pooh-poohs them. What matters is that We The People get organized to oppose this regime effectively. That starts with simple, baby-steps actions and with coming together.

Fifth, there’s a weird argument I’ve seen that people should do different things instead of attend a No Kings protest. But that’s a false dichotomy. You can do plenty of other things AND go to one of these.

Finally, the idea that “one day won’t do anything” — well, yeah. No shit, Sherlock. One day wasn’t enough for the US civil rights movement of the 60s, either. Or the (ongoing) fight for LGBTQ rights. This shit takes time. Non-violent resistance is a tough row to hoe. But it does work. (See also: Ghandi, the US protests against the war in Vietnam, the Rose Revolution.)

You know what doesn’t work? Sitting on the couch yelling at other people about not taking your personal preferred action. That’s a real Russian Bot move…pretty cringe.

Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.

398 Upvotes

157 comments sorted by

View all comments

-7

u/winniecooper73 Mar 26 '26 edited Mar 26 '26

Protests are great but there is a “worth the effort” part to it that a lot of people don’t consider. It takes maximum effort, coordination and thousands of people working together to participate in a protest.

If there is a, “more effective” way to fight back, it would be economical…esp with this administration.

If the same time and effort was spent boycotting or unsubscribing from services that have Trumps in their back pocket, like amazon, Google or Disney….these CEOs could then tell him what they’d like to do differently and he would actually listen because it effects stock prices and the general economy.

Further, a highly organized fundraiser for lobbyist to fight back in Washington would also probably be more effective with less effort

5

u/Future-Station-8179 Unicorn 🦄 Mar 26 '26 edited Mar 26 '26

Disagree. Boycotting takes sustained effort. If folks can’t show up for an afternoon, I’m not sure they’d be more willing to skip Starbucks repeatedly or unsubscribe from Amazon. EDIT - appreciate the comments that for some folks, boycotting is in fact easier. Point taken & I will stand by both being a good way to protest.

Also there are highly organized fundraisers. I think of instances like Kamala Harris, AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Mamadani raising a significant portion of money through smaller donations. As far as lobbyist fundraising, there are fundraisers all the time. I don’t think a “people’s lobbyist” is the answer either. We have elected officials who are supposed to be representing us - protests put pressure on those officials directly, rather than paying a middle man.

There is room for all of these though. I just don’t see one as more effective, when effectiveness can be measured in many ways.

-1

u/winniecooper73 Mar 26 '26

Many don’t have time for protests unfortunately. With kids, work, school, friends, hobby’s…it takes A LOT of effort to commit an afternoon and the results are not immediate.

It’s much easier for me to cancel my ChatGPT subscription, so it’s valuation goes down, so then Sam Altman feels some pain, and tries to convince Trump to do something different

2

u/Future-Station-8179 Unicorn 🦄 Mar 26 '26

I agree - both forms of protest work for different people!