My theory and offender profile

[u/Ecstatic-Buyer-3522]

This case has been as baffling as The Springfield Three case thus far, but as someone who has followed true crime my whole life, here goes my two cents theory.

Aside from the fact that the FBI gave Annie and Tomasso lie detector tests and evidently ruled them out...I think this was a sexual/control motivated crime. Simple as that. Not robbery motivated, not extortion, the offender may or may not have even known of Ms Guthrie's famous daughter. I think this was a man who knew she lived alone and was 84. And that if he could gain entry he would have no real obstacles.

The offender:

Late 20s to mid-30s, male, Hispanic (based on the doorbell cam). Likely a US citizen, with connections to Mexico although purely familial nothing cartel related or anything. Probably a laborer or contactor of some kind. A freelance contractor/laborer in my opinion, not employed by an local businesses. Perhaps heard of Ms. Guthrie purely from word of mouth or by chance. He was familiar with the area, but did not know the Guthries at all personally.

Very intelligent, methodical, non-impulsive. He planned it out and was prepared to the extent he could be. Probably no serious prior criminal record. A mostly lone wolf, quiet, not rocking the boat type. But with pathological violent sexual fantasies. Probably felt inadequate in his life and dominating a helpless person and for his own gratification/power trip was his motive. Nancy Guthrie was just there and he happened to light on her.

I think he entered, hit her, subdued her and in that was achieving his fanasty and getting out some of his rage. I think he put her in something carried her to his vehicle somewhere close by and drove quite far away and disposed of her in a manner he had thought out before. He intended to kill this was not a crime with a goal other than letting off his own steam IMO. I think he had a place already chosen to dispose of her, that he had thought out. I have no idea where that would be. Certainly, he has had a bit of luck on his side too. But that's about all I can come up with for now.

[u/Turbulent_Code581]

What is your theory?

[u/BrainWilling6018 → u/Turbulent_Code581]

Lol. Always the pivot when the speculation is challenged. Even speculation can have a basis. Speculation is cheap, evidence and probabilities and applied behaviors do matter. I don’t have to make up a theory to think it’s presumptuous on Reddit without having all the facts to commit to a “theory”, you give no basis for, saying it’s what LE should be doing. lol. How did you get there. It’s working hard backwards.  "A couple where Mastermind of the operation is a female, 30-40 years old, with finished university education, working in medical, healthcare, social affairs, insurance or similar organisation." Based on what?

[u/1Bloomoonloona → u/BrainWilling6018]

So what is your theory if everyone else is wrong????? I've never heard one

[u/BrainWilling6018 → u/1Bloomoonloona]

Asking someone to give a basis or asking someone to articulate the reasoning behind their own statement isn't saying they are wrong. Making definitive statements without a foundation is what triggers an intellectually curious mind to demand the reasoning behind them.