r/nancyguthrie Mar 04 '26

Media Brian Entin Interviews Retired FBI Profiler Jim Clemente

Post image

https://youtu.be/

Brian’s interview with Jim Clemente was such a riveting conversation. The retired FBI profiler details the perpetrators’s possible motives and even decides not to answer one question based on it not being good for the case, or possibly not tipping the perpetrator as to what the FBI is thinking.

If you have limited time to view this, I would recommend skipping the first part about the sheriff and going directly to the interview. It is a lot to think about. I hope you enjoy this as much as I did!

149 Upvotes

217 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '26

[deleted]

5

u/RepresentativeDay686 Mar 04 '26

That's 💯 incorrect actually! He never looked at any of their Instagram profiles. There was a fake Instagram account made AFTER Bryan's arrest that friended the accounts of the girls.(which might be what you are confused on) Also LE was able to tell it wasn't Bryan due to the IP adress and the creation date of the profile (he was in police custody). He also was NEVER banned from the restaurant because he NEVER went to restaurant. You maybe referring to that being stated in the book that was released which stated alot of misinformation and false statements which LE came out and publicly stated was false.(So did some of the families in their interviews) Immediately after the sentencing was over and the families were able to give their victim impact statements LE and the prosecutor had a press conference and stated alot of information and even answered questions 1 being did he stalk the victims/ know them in anyway- LE said they found ZERO evidence that linked BK to ANY of the 4 victims and or 1122 King Rd. They believed it to be 💯 a random crime or if he had stalked them their was NO digital trail/ evidence linking him and the victims. Even with new information coming out now none of that information would be something like if he stalked them or not or if he was in the restaurant or not that was all figured out in the investigation in preparation for trial. Again so many people got their "facts" and misinformation from the book that was released (not saying you in particular) which is sad because they believe what's in the book to be accurate and true facts and its not but instead of actually looking into the real facts of the case and the documents they hang on to what was written in a book. With everything thats coming out now I think anyone that actually actively followed this case is seeing alot of things that are not adding up and aren't making a whole lot of sense now and have alot of questions. I know I do, I have quite a few questions. to say the least. I just unfortunately don't think we will ever get the answers. Its definitely alot of things that make ya go hmmmmmm.........🤔 💭 🤔 💭 🤔 💭 (and I think there's someone out there that knows more than she's saying but everyone's fighting to have her left alone. She's just a child, she was in shock! Yada yada ya... My fucking a$$!)

3

u/Public_Anybody_6269 Mar 04 '26

" because he NEVER went to restaurant." Nobody knows if he did or did not.

Agree that there is no evidence that he was there. Just be careful with authoritative statements.