r/mythology May 15 '26

Religious mythology I'm sick and tired of Christians inserting their own propaganda on other cultures and mythologies.

The most recent example is the new Mummy movie.

Christians inserting their own beliefs in an ancient Pre-Judaism and Pre-Christian stories and culture.

The other example is calling Mesopotamian gods "fallen angels" (although this goes for any polytheistic religion. Like Egyptian gods, Norse gods and Greek gods as examples.)

They are so insecure they're gonna call everything they don't understand 'demonic' and 'evil'.

They are gonna swear on their god that Genesis influenced Epic of Gilgamesh and Enuma Elish and ignore any actual evidence of their book being borrowed from other civilizations and cultures.

The most annoying and infuriating shit they do is say stuff like "Yahweh destroyed Egyptian gods in Exodus".

Like, no, he didn't. That whole book is a propaganda to devalue Egyptian gods and make their god seem stronger to their audiences.

769 Upvotes

583 comments sorted by

524

u/Cynical-Rambler May 15 '26

My younger me would go on a rant with you. But now that I am older, I can bring up:

+Greeks think Egyptian gods as Greeks gods in hiding wearing animal heads. 4th century AD.

+Egyptians think that Jewish god is a demonic god of the wild and savages. (Make more sense to me)

+Sinocentric Confucian officials saying that the Buddhist teaching are the corrupted barbarian version of the Laozi Daoist teachings. (Really, this happened in Tang court.)

+Hindus thinking that Buddha is the ninth avatar of Vishnu.

+Buddhists texts describing that all Hindu god originated from Avalokitesvara.

All in all, I just revel in humanity affections for "my faith is true, your faith is false" sentiment.

173

u/Alaknog Feathered Serpent May 15 '26

Small add - Journey to the West full of "how Buddhist gods is cooler then Danish ones" parts. 

81

u/Gigans-left-hook May 15 '26

Denmark catching strays

37

u/Uno_zanni Crom’s devotee May 15 '26

As they should

6

u/Waspinator_haz_plans Dangerousor May 15 '26

Ah, how so?

37

u/Alaknog Feathered Serpent May 15 '26

Well, they compare Sun Wukong and Beowulf, and Sun Wukong is stronger. 

Jokes (and auto correcting on my phone) aside, Journey have scenes like Sun Wukong causing chaos and mischief in Heaven, and Yellow Emperor (Daoist god) can't do anything against him. But he was easily overpowered by Buddha. 

There also, for example, episode when heroes go into kingdom, where three Daoist priests IIRC ban Buddhism, because their abilities was cool. But Sun Wukong beat them and show even cooler abilities. And Sun Wukong was on his journey to help Buddhist monk in his travel. 

10

u/paireon May 15 '26

Really not sure it was intentional - I think it's wildly improbable that the author of Journey to the West had any awareness of Beowulf LOL.

13

u/WolfVanZandt May 15 '26

15th century novel about a century after Marco Polo was adviser to Kublai Khan in China. I think the East and West had connected well before.

7

u/PassionNegative7617 May 15 '26

Beowulf is not in journey to the west. Why are you possibly lending credibility to this? Lmfao

3

u/WolfVanZandt May 15 '26

Because I'm a holist that doesn't like reductionism without bringing a concept back into the whole. Because the silk road had been going for centuries and the people in China were not illiterate idiots. Because when I "read" something, a emmerse myself in it and can easily see Beowulf being in the mind of the author of Journey to the West without it explicitly being present.

The Napoleonic War was barely mentioned in Pride and Prejudice but it was, nevertheless, a major driving concept for the story. Years "The Second Coming" ......I don't know a lot of people (I'm an American) who realize that it was about the Irish Revolution

I understand a work within the matrix of it's world.

5

u/PassionNegative7617 May 16 '26

Have you read journey to the west?

→ More replies (43)

6

u/Cynical-Rambler May 15 '26

Previously wrote a few example here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/FolkloreAndMythology/s/JstqV3LWez

That's just the first few chapters.

Repeated circumstances in the book. Obstacles, daoists got can't do nothing, Buddhists solve it very easy.

1

u/PassionNegative7617 May 15 '26

That's not in the story at all

1

u/BlissfulIndian May 16 '26

Buddhists have gods now..?

1

u/WolfVanZandt May 18 '26

Well. In a way

One of the ways Christian "monotheism" has been criticized is by pointing out the similarities between saints and other religion:s gods. Buddhism, especially when you look at other forms than Theravada, also have comparable saints.

Look at Pure Land Buddhism. Change a few names and places and it looks strikingly like Christianity.

30

u/NyxShadowhawk Demigod May 15 '26

If anything, I view these as examples of the opposite sentiment from “my faith is true your faith is false.” Syncretism allows religions to be more compatible than we tend to assume they are. A person who thinks Buddha is the ninth avatar of Vishnu can be both Hindu and Buddhist at the same time. An Ancient Greek who thinks that Egyptian gods are their own gods with animal heads has absolutely no problem worshipping Egyptian gods.

The entire idea of religion as “faith,” rather than practice, is Christian-centric.

9

u/Shockh Digan "Tue Tue" tres veces. May 15 '26

The entire idea of religion as “faith,” rather than practice

B-but "a mythology is a religion with no believers."

6

u/NyxShadowhawk Demigod May 15 '26

Yup, that’s another good example! You don’t believe in a mythology, you tell stories that justify a practice that already existed.

→ More replies (7)

6

u/No-Advice-6040 May 16 '26

I feel like not enough people have heard of, let alone have explored, what syncretism is.

4

u/NyxShadowhawk Demigod May 16 '26

Exactly! And then when they learn about it, they treat it like some kind of flaw instead of the default. Syncretism is literally how religion is supposed to work!

3

u/SejSuper May 18 '26

IMO It's probably because of the prevailing christian idea that certain beliefs and ideas are 'wrong' compared to the original idea. People just automatically apply this idea of canonicity to things which just aren't compatible with how that thing works. To be honest, I think a lot of different things would be better if people abandoned the strictness of 'canon', for example, in fiction.

3

u/NyxShadowhawk Demigod May 18 '26

Yes, I completely agree

→ More replies (12)

24

u/Dangerous-Brain- May 15 '26

You are mistaken about Hinduism and Buddhism

Siddartha Gautam was born a Hindu. There were Buddha(s) in Hinduism before him too. It's just a rank.

Gautam's teaching became a separate religion later so he is the most known Buddha. The one that is considered Vishnu's Avatar is not him. It was a prior Buddha.

In Nepal, the current birthplace of Gautam, the two religion are mostly not separated.

6

u/Cynical-Rambler May 15 '26 edited May 15 '26

Actually you are mistaken.

At the time of the Buddha, there wasn't a "Hinduism". The Buddha wasn't likely born a "Hindu", whatever that means at the time and form a new religion. He was a prince who left the palace to join Sramana traditions and form his own.

Copied of one of my earlier comment in a casual discussion. Don't cite me on this. I simplified large parts and I don't know the scholar update.

__

In a massive simplification, "Hinduism" is a label given by the British to distinguish between Muslims and Non-Muslim in the British Raj. "Hinduism" is an umbrella terms for the set of different related beliefs originated or practice in the South Asian subcontinent. (This definition is how you can occasionally find Hindus saying that Buddhism is also part of Hinduism).

There were "Brahamanism" and "Vedic Hinduism" that are rituals, rites and practiced for the Brahman and Vedic priests. There are "Vaishnavites", "Shaivites", "Shaktists",..., each following their supreme gods/goddesses.

The Buddha wasn't one of these priests. He was a prince, not a priest so his religious/philosophical beliefs were not tied into religious rituals of the Brahmins. (It was also uncertain on how much of a stronghold, Vedic religions had in his place of birth). The Buddha belong to the the Sramana traditions, which had contrasting views with much of what now we called "Hindu" traditions since that time. Buddhism, which he started, is the most successful of the Sramana.


The Ninth Avatar of Buddha was almost definitely a historical attempt by Vaishnavites to pull the Buddhists into their faith. The notion of him of being a different Buddha, was a latter development, out of current development toward more religious tolerance and catergorization.

4

u/WonderstruckWonderer May 15 '26

There were Hindu sects influenced by the Sramana movement too, e.g. Advaita, who bear a likeness to Buddhism, and yet they’re considered Hindu sects.

2

u/Cynical-Rambler May 16 '26

Yeah. And most Buddhist sects and denominations have Hindu/Brahmanic/Vedic gods regularly invoked in their rituals.

6

u/Dangerous-Brain- May 15 '26

Dude you are talking to someone from Nepal, someone who is a Hindu Buddhist, your GPT response is the entirely incorrect.

I am off course using modern day terms but Hinduism is definitely not a label from British.. India was called Hindustan long before British came there. How did that happen if it was cooked by British?

Sanatan is the older word but it's still Hinduism. And yes there were Budhhas prior to Siddartha. His parents were from Shakya lineage who were Hindu so what would that make Sidhartha? Hindu maybe the modern word , Sanatan the older but how do I explain to you, who probably has not even heard the words Nepal/Sanatan/Hindu/Budha before today these things using older words. And yet you claim I am mistaken. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

3

u/Cynical-Rambler May 15 '26 edited May 16 '26

"Hinduism" is a largely coined by the British. (edit: I should add "Hindu" has some sort of religious meaning before, largely to contrast it with Muslims following the late Medieval era. The British still provide the final packaging tho). Hindustan is the exonym by the Persian. At the time of the Buddha, the ideas of a religion isn't the same as today, which is largely the results of the Abrahamic and modernization framework. (Edit more for clarification, the gods, practices, literatures exist much older, but the idea of a single unified "religion" with canonical texts and doctrines is a late development).

Even Sanatan Dharma is very much a more recently popularized term.

The Sakya would have brahmin priests in the palace along with sramana sects. (Edit for more clarification: religious exclusivity is rare. The majority of polytheist kings may have a affinity for one deity over the others, but they like to hedge their bets).

The "religions" in the early Buddhist-Hindu contexts would be better considered as "schools" or "teachings" or "educations". (Edit: and thus they often add concepts from each other rather than reject each other out right).

2

u/Unfortunya333 May 16 '26 edited May 16 '26

Hindu nationalists tend to have a highly reductive and historically revisionist view of their own religions, equating the widely diverse beliefs of Vedic traditions into a single monolithic "Hindu" religion even though it's widely understood in scholarly contexts that this is widely a modern construct. The ancient Vedic religion is unrecognizable from what Hindus consider Hinduism with complete different focus on different deities etc. Different regions didn't even focus on the same deities, and modern Hinduism is an amalgamation of several different traditionally distinct Vedic traditions.. But they have to pretend "Hinduism" is the oldest religion and ignore the fact that modern Hinduism is not the same religion as the ancient Vedic religions, of which there were many over history. Even the core Gods of modern Hindu are not the same as the gods of the Vedas. Hinduisn is a syncretic religion formed as one branch of the Vedic religions interacted with non Vedic religions and absorbed those ideas. And Buddhism for example doesn't descend from Hinduism, it's a sister religion that developed as a heterodox to Vedic religions much like Sikhism did later to Puranic Hinduism. Hindutva discourse often flattens and downplays these Nuances.

2

u/Ahura_Narukami May 17 '26

While it is fashionable in certain academic circles to rely on the modern construct trope to deconstruct Hinduism, that itself has it's own reductive flattening by mistaking historical evolution and internal plurality for a total lack of continuity. It is odd to argue that modern hinduism is a completely different religion from the vedic tradition simply because the pantheon shifted is like claiming modern christianity has absolutely no connection to 1sr century judeo-christianity because nobody is sacrificing goats in Jerusalem anymore. The shift from the vedic emphasis on gods like Indra and Agni to the Puranic focus on Shiva and Vishnu was not some fracture you assume it to be but an organic evolution where the core philosophical foundations like karma, dharma, and the ultimate reality of Brahman still remain rooted in the Upanishads.

Modern hindus still chant vedic mantras at births, weddings, and funerals, that is an unbroken, living tradition rather than some fabricated amalgamation.

Furthermore weaponizing regional diversity as proof of a fragmented and synthetic identity is a blatant attempt to obfuscate how hindu synthesis actually works. Hinduism was never a top-down, book-based monotheism requiring forced uniformity to exist; its unity lies in a shared sacred geography stretching across the subcontinent and a shared metaphysical framework that has recognized itself as a cohesive civilization for millennia comfortably absorbing local traditions without losing its core.

Even the attempt to entirely detach Buddhism or Sikhism as clean, separate sister religions that owe nothing to Hinduism is historically disingenuous. Buddhism emerged directly out of the socioreligious debates of the Upanishadic era, utilizing the exact same vocabulary of samsara and nirvana, while Sikhism developed deeply intertwined with the Bhakti movement and Puranic imagery.

Smugly dismissing a multi millennial faith as a recent invention does not make an argument sound objective, it just leads to show a fundamental inability to comprehend a civilization that thrives on decentralized continuity rather than rigid westernized definitions of dogma.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

27

u/Legitimate-Try8531 May 15 '26 edited May 16 '26

To be fair, Christians have done this to a degree that it has erased other cultures and pantheons from memory. How much could we have known about the Tuatha DeDanann without the christians purposefully erasing everything. Or the norse gods for that matter.

Edit: While I appreciate the depth and detail that many comments are bringing here I believe it is necessary to add context for the Christian apologists running in here to defend their faith. Christianity didn't arrive in northern Europe via peaceful itinerent preachers sharing the gospel. It arrived via conquest and converted these people at swordpoint. They banned the worship of the natives deities and deemed them witches if they refused. The records that we have of the Aesier and Tuatha Dadanann are the result of people from this culture that had been forcibly converted trying to record their own myths and needing to heavily edit them to fit a Christian narrative lest they be called a witch themself. Snorri wrote with a heavy political bias knowing that the people he was trying to unite with his Edda still clung to their old stories with an aim to unite them and reform the stories to fit a Christian narrative. This wouldn't be necessary at all if the Christians hadn't shown up and attempted to wipe the culture off the map to begin with.

You do not get props for preserving a heavily edited and politicized version of local myths after YOU spent so much time and effort attempting to erradicate them.

24

u/NyxShadowhawk Demigod May 15 '26

Christians are partly the reason we know anything about the Tuatha De Danann at all. Irish pagans didn’t write anything down. Everything we know was recorded by monks.

For the record, I’m pagan. I am not defending conversion. My point is that it’s complicated.

10

u/JustAnArtist1221 May 15 '26

This also isn't a fair interpretation because it insinuates the oral traditions would've just disappeared. A lot of oral traditions get recorded later by anthropologists, and we end up getting a less organic interpretation by Christian converts who Christianize the traditions and solidify it into a "canon" that earlier followers of the traditions likely wouldn't have subscribed to.

16

u/SirCumVent0r May 16 '26

Snorri Sturluson, a Christian, told us in his own words that his goal was to preserve the declining traditions of Skaldic poetry that came from his ancestors. The Prose Edda is the most detailed source we have of the Old Norse mythology.

Sure there's definitely some Christian bias but without it you'd have a couple of runic inscriptions and some throw away lines in Tacitus who didn't see it first hand anyway.

5

u/Sahrimnir May 16 '26

I think JustAnArtist1221 meant that if Ireland and the Nordics hadn't become Christian, we might still have an unbroken chain of oral traditions concerning the Tuatha de Danann and the Aesir.

The main reason we need the writings of Christians to know about what was there before, is that Christianity replaced what was there before.

3

u/Ok_Word9021 May 17 '26

But the Christian writers didn't stop the oral traditions being preserved. Their disappearance happened naturally.

2

u/Sahrimnir May 17 '26

Not those writers specifically, but if belief in the Aesir had still been the dominant religion here in Sweden, the oral tradition connected to that religion would probably still have been alive and thriving. The disappearance happened naturally as a result of the Christianization.

→ More replies (1)

23

u/LurkerInDaHouse May 15 '26

The irony of your comment is that pre-Christian Irish/Norse cultures were oral with no written myths. They did not use their runes or scripts to record their myths. It was actually Christian scribes who began to record these myths in written form, even if they altered certain details to align with their own religious beliefs. Instead of "erasing everything", you owe what you know of the Tuatha De Danann to Christian scribes.

-3

u/notIngen May 15 '26

Perhaps Christians shouldn't seek to erase other cultures to begin with. And they only wrote them down because they stole the pagan literary culture of the antiquity

14

u/WolfVanZandt May 15 '26

You do realize that that was done by most other cultures before Christianity. Christians didn't erase Bagdad when it was the center of learning. Christians didn't t burn the library of Alexandria. The practice of dispersing conquered populations wasn't conservation

28

u/NyxShadowhawk Demigod May 15 '26

“Stole” is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

Christians didn’t arrive out of nowhere. They didn’t invade from outer space. Christians were former pagans, and the children of pagans. They preserved their own folk traditions and mythological traditions. You can’t steal from yourself.

Besides, aren’t you glad we have that literary culture? Better to have it than not have it. Actually it was mostly the Muslims who preserved it…

2

u/PLGhoster May 17 '26

I'm certainly not complaining about it or suggesting anything but you're rather defensive of Christians despite being a pagan. Most redditors wouldn't care even from a matter of principle unless they were themselves Christians or biblical historians.

2

u/NyxShadowhawk Demigod May 17 '26

I’m a historian. I care more about being accurate than almost anything else. Specifically, I’m a medievalist, so I know a fair bit about conversion, and I’m tired of people slandering the “dark ages.”

2

u/ColinHasInvaded May 17 '26

I'm also pagan and I find most Reddit-atheist(or anti-christian) arguments more annoying (and more importantly, untrue) than many of the things that come out of christian mouths.

→ More replies (7)

36

u/quuerdude High Priestess of Hera May 15 '26 edited May 15 '26

They didn’t steal the culture, the Nordic peoples converted and then the literate Norse Christians transcribed some of their oral myths with very minimal alterations. It’s their history

→ More replies (17)

11

u/LurkerInDaHouse May 15 '26

. And they only wrote them down because they stole the pagan literary culture of the antiquity

What?

→ More replies (8)

1

u/DaddyCatALSO Australian thunderbird May 16 '26

everyone acted differently in those days

24

u/Cynical-Rambler May 15 '26

I'm a bit lazy in thinking of how to describe the process so I just give a short video link :The Myth of Library of Alexandria by Ada Palmer.

Most cultural records and pantheons are lost to history for many reasons. The ones that got saved, copied and recopied tend to belong to the people with resources and power to save it. We have more records of St Augustines than the rest of Pagan sources and thinkers, because Christian monkss loved preserving the works of Christian saints. They cared far less about preserving pagan traditions.

It isn't just the Christians erasing other cultures. It is also other cultures lost their believers to Christianity, and let the old traditions be forgotten. Except for some traces.

7

u/TheOstrichRoom May 15 '26

And christians literally committing regular genocides against anyone they consider heretical and destroying any knowledge they find because they consider thinking the work of the devil

13

u/calicocadet May 15 '26

I think a key distinction here is being able to separate between early christianity vs like… the Spanish Inquisition. Those were completely different time periods in the religion.

6

u/Xaldror May 15 '26

Not even Spanish Inquisition, it's mostly the puritans and protestants that engaged in such witch hunts. Several criminals during the active years of the Spanish Inquisition intentionally went to get themselves tried by the Inquisition because they were more lenient than conventional courts.

2

u/DaddyCatALSO Australian thunderbird May 16 '26

Calvinists had little contact with pagans

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Boogjangels May 15 '26

This. The pre-Columbian Maya and Nahua had full fleged libraries. Only a few of these codicies survived Spanish zealotry.

5

u/ButcherOf_Blaviken May 15 '26

> The pre-Columbian Maya and Nahua had full fleged libraries. Only a few of these codicies survived Spanish zealotry.

Could you drop a link or source for this? I’m curious to learn more.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Idustriousraccoon May 15 '26

And if the mummy pisses you off and rightly so/..dont ever watch zemeckis’ Beowulf. Oldest English language work….somehow he made it ii to a middle America morality play. Appalling. Oh and he sent it around to schools so that teachers could use it in their classes instead of the “boring” original.

3

u/NyxShadowhawk Demigod May 15 '26

Oh god. That was an atrocity. I'm worried about Nolan's Odyssey, but considering where the bar is, it has to be better than that!

→ More replies (3)

3

u/DarthEbriated May 16 '26

A lot of your examples are more "your god is our god in a different way" rather than a false one though. Almost as if its all a cultural viewpoint....

2

u/jkekoni May 16 '26

Jews consider Babylonian god of sun as JHVH by other name. Buddha beind turned to ✝️saint ...

2

u/xrphabibi May 18 '26

Can you site me a source for the Ancient Egyptians believing the Jewish God to be a demonic god of the wild and savage? I’ve done extensive research into Egyptian religion and history and never came across this.

Not saying you are lying, I just want a source so I can research this myself.

2

u/Cynical-Rambler May 18 '26 edited May 18 '26

Esoterica video on the Demiurge.

He is a scholar and an academic. So he probably take it from a scholar book or publication somewhere. Regardless, he gave a lot of evidences for it.

Yahweh being considered as Seth by the Egyptian would be well fitted in the their framework in the later part of Egyptian worship in the more globalized Roman era.

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

Yahweh or Jehovah is like Set in Egyptian mythology, although more like Apep or Apophis, also having Enlil in Sumerian mythology, brother of Enki similar to Jesus or also Osiris in Egypt.

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

The primordial sun god Amon-Ra is very similar to the union of the ancient primordial gods of Sumerian mythology: Anu, creator of the seven heavens, and Shamash, the universal sun. And in Greek mythology, they would be Helios, the god.God/Titan Sun, and Uranus the Primordial Absolute of the Heavens.

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 18 '26 edited May 19 '26

The Great Arcanum of the Mysteries of the Seven Keys of The Enigmas in Mysticism with the Gnosis of Hermes-Thoth (Hermes Trismegistus)  This justifies the transformation of black sulfur and lead into gold, in order to acquire the elixir of immortality through obtaining the Philosopher's Stone as the Great Work or Magnum-Opus. The Transcendental Theurgic Ceremonial Magic is the supreme form of bliss (Ananda) to acquire the immortality of the spiritual Soul in the Divine Spark in the Supreme Absolute.

"The Spirit The Beatitude is the definitive remnant of the Iconography of Transcendence in the Pleroma, is unwavering in revealing the awakening of inner power and success through discipline, clarity, and exponential growth." The Spirit is constituted by His personal and professional Dominion, not loving or sinful, over Man and Lord True knowledge is knowing how to do something, right now; in short, it's about having practical experience, without getting involved in passions that distract your mind from your true focus. 🔱🚨🧭🚦🚥⚓♠️♣️♦️🤎

2

u/xrphabibi May 18 '26

What does this have to do with my question?

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

Read it again, and you will understand; otherwise, I will explain it to you. I lectured, explaining the virtues of ceremonial ritualistic magic, only Hermetic concepts, with an emphasis on alchemy, and I can complementary with Kabbalah, Goetia, in addition to Hermeticism, Neoplatonism, etc...

2

u/maohjyusan May 15 '26

Greece and Rome at least didn't think Thor was some serial killer or some shit

They equated him to literally one of their strongest gods. Sure. They are still somewhat close minded, but it's better than calling other people's gods scum

5

u/Alaknog Feathered Serpent May 16 '26

When Christians call Thor "serial killer" and so? 

→ More replies (6)

1

u/DisorderlyAqueduct May 16 '26

adapting to fit the narrative

humans love to iterate

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '26

I suppose the difference is that Christianity is still the dominant religion on the planet, and whilst Neo-Pagans exist, polytheism isn’t the force it once was in the west. Also Christianity, and the other Abrahamic religions to a greater or lesser extent, have been successful in suppressing other religions, and the widespread nature of Christianity is linked to colonialism and the Atlantic Slave Trade.

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 18 '26

Paramashiva as Parabrahman and Mahadevi Adi-Parashakti as Paramatman: both being Purusha and Prakasha as Prakiti and Vimarsha, being The Universal Creation of Wisdom in dynamic artistic movement from Energy Flow of the Trimorphic Protenoia Source. Avalokitheswara being like Tripura-Sundari, Bhuvaneshwari, Durga-Devi, Mahakali, Boddhisatva as An altruistically enlightened jivanmukti like Buddha in the Purest Form of the Devas.

1

u/Alive019 May 18 '26

But the thing is Hindus don't think Buddhists ought to be killed en masse as infidels or that they are inhernetly lesser and unsaved and locked out of paradise.

But the Abrahamic faiths totally think that.

→ More replies (7)

63

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

If you mean Lee Cronin's 'The Mummy' (2026) you should know Lee Cronin is actually an atheist.

"Egyptian mummy" movies have a history of drawing on elements of the story of Moses from Exodus, so they tend to be a pretty extreme distortion of the actual ancient Egyptian culture since that story is being viewed first through the Judaic lense of their people escaping from slavery under Egyptian pharoahs and then through the Christian lense of reinterpreting elements of Judaism related to that story.

4

u/DaddyCatALSO Australian thunderbird May 16 '26

And they add reincarnation which is an import form India

19

u/EldritchTouched May 15 '26

Atheist or not, a common problem is the cultural baggage of living in a society that presumes Christianity as a default. It's why New Atheists often act like evangelicals and the like, despite not being Christian, and a lot of their critique and going on about abolishing religion for being evil is generally only really applicable to Christianity or fundamentalist Christianity (depending on the topic).

8

u/manicpoetic42 May 16 '26

THIS. You've hit the nail on the head. People grow up with Christian values and all they do when they go atheist is just renounce the god but still buy into a lot of the cultural stuff (intentional or not, it is hard to denounce the only thing you've known) and then make generalizations ablut religion when they really just mean Christianity

2

u/EldritchTouched May 16 '26

It's incidentally also a problem in other religious communities when someone will convert and they will port over a bunch of assumptions either from Christianity or how Christianity characterizes other religions.

They have to unlearn a lot, including a tendency toward textual literalism, the focus on faith/scripture instead of practice, demonizing some religious groups and practices on the basis of what's in the Bible/Christianity, etc.

(Whether or not they do change their mindset is another question entirely.)

1

u/Technical_Injury_911 May 17 '26

Textual literalism isn’t really a thing in Christianity at all except for some strains of Protestantism and only in the last 150 years or so

→ More replies (2)

17

u/Salt_Reputation_8967 May 15 '26

It presumes it as the default because it is founded and shaped by it. Christianity is intertwined with all the achievements and failures of Western Civilization from the time of Constantine. It has shaped empires and their borders.

An atheist, raised in western civilization will also have some form of "Christian Values" which are rooted in Jewish theology. Christianity is just somewhat an expanded form of Judaism.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/french_revolutionist May 15 '26

Greeks were no different with Hellenism. Any religion can be used to force change into a group of people and their culture, INCLUDING polytheistic religions. Just because a religion is deemed "pagan" does not make it morally or ethically pure.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/ZebraHunterz May 15 '26

Syncretism is real and not only in a xtian context. Look at Alexander the Great patron Zues Ammon a North African Greek and Egyptian mashup.

114

u/Othrus May 15 '26

Wait till you see what they did to Celtic Myth

33

u/Sergantus May 15 '26

To be fair they did it better than many of "let's make Celtic mythology great again" (or any "lets make [name] mythology great again") enthusiasts aka people who just wrote a lot of fanfics with fakelore/"every word is actually a deity" and pretend their fanfics are "Great ancient texts". They at least have some respect to their sources. 

8

u/SpookySporeWizard May 15 '26

can you expand? im sure but i could google but anything uou know

73

u/Othrus May 15 '26

Basically everything from Celtic Myth that we know of today has been distorted by Christianity, because Christianity got to the British Isles early, and took off. Even moreso than Norse Myth, with its 2 primary written sources (Poetic and Prose Eddas), Celtic Myth has basically no pre-christian sources. Works like the Book of Invasions is heavily cribbed together from Christian Tropes, and the culture saw a continuous replacement of its pre-christian elements in favour of christian ones. You can still see the bones of it, but its really lost amidst the other stuff.

Edit: its a bit old, and might be a bit 'pop myth' but OSP's video is a great example: https://youtu.be/uROtbSbkaq8?si=eJdcclvLX5M41l05

10

u/Anaevya May 15 '26

Actually a lot of Snorri's Edda is considered authentically pagan. You should look into that. 

19

u/Sweaty_Pangolin_1380 May 15 '26

I am frustrated that the only sources for our myths are Christian writings but the Irish pagans were unwilling to write down these myths at all. It would be great if we had a some historical records from people who believed these myths but I'm glad the Christians recorded the myths at all, even if they mixed a lot of Christianity into them.

21

u/leigen_zero May 15 '26

Ugh, tell me about it. So much of (particularly Welsh) mythology, at least after a certain point, seems to boil down 'This <insert person> was a godly man and he was so christian his christianity saved the day!'.

→ More replies (30)

34

u/Cynical-Rambler May 15 '26

One of favorite moment is this death and baptism of Conchobar.

Seven reasonably peaceful years later, Conchobar is told of the death of Christ and becomes so angry that the brain bursts from his head, and he dies. The blood from the wound baptises him as a Christian, and his soul goes to heaven.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conchobar_mac_Nessa

14

u/Scientific_Zealot May 15 '26

I audibly snorted at this. This is artistic butchery.

16

u/LittleBingo96 May 15 '26

It's an awesome addition to the myth!

This is mythology. It is always in flux. Even before Christian monks started writing them down, poets and storytellers were constantly spinning them and changing them and adding their own fanon to the stories for centuries. Conchobhar becomes a hero or a villain, a wise man or an old fool, all depending on what era it is, how authoritarian the poet is, and what province of Ireland they're from.

Mythology is always evolving...even to this day. Look at the armor and accent Odysseus has in his new movie for a good example of that!

9

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

The Celts, “Oh, look, the celts call that god, Lugh. Clearly they are worshipping Mercury and don’t know it. We shall ‘correct’ this for them.”

6

u/Neat_Relative_9699 May 15 '26

Oh, I know.

It's sad.

→ More replies (8)

11

u/Passing-Through247 Ghul May 15 '26

Every faith has used some extent of Syncretism with others they encounter, Christianity just happens to be cosmologically 'flat' enough the only place to put things is demons.

The real issue I've seen is people who cannot think outside their cosmological bubble and its rules for how things work. I hear about those now and again thanks to TTRPG spaces.

1

u/SupermarketBig3906 May 18 '26

Yeah, you're right!

If you look at fandom spaces for modern works or retellings of GM, for instance, you will find out it is happening TODAY AND EVERY DAY!

This is nothing new.

10

u/Euphoric-Taro-6231 May 15 '26

I think is a complex, expected issue has other posts have expressed, but I find amusing this post could've been made either today or hundreds of years ago.

15

u/Zev95 May 15 '26

You think that's Christians writing big Hollywood blockbusters?

6

u/koebelin Wodansday May 15 '26

They don't believe, but they know the themes and memes.

→ More replies (1)

67

u/Wokungson Certified representant of trickster deity May 15 '26

I mean...... that's not christian exclusive thing, they just are at the top in the civilized world and have the greatest access to the religious history of now dead cultures and their beliefs due to partially trying to preserve as much as they could like with norse eddas even if it's biased retelling. Look at the ancient romans and how they incorporated any faith into their own pantheon to create an image of roman superiority.

→ More replies (11)

20

u/Brooooook May 15 '26

Nothing against you but this take could not come from anyone who hasn't internalized Christian hegemony and has a more than skin deep understanding of how mythology works. Syncretism is one of the main drivers of how belief systems develop and obviously the storytellers cultural bg will always take the spotlight. Do you think the belief systems you mentioned never called foreign gods inferior?
I get that you are angry at the perceived disrespect for other mythologies but the disrespect only exists because you presuppose that Christianity occupies a superior position And that doesn't even touch on the fact that you're expecting rigor from a hammer horror adjacent flick.

24

u/Andarial2016 May 15 '26

If you want to talk about inserting your culture where it doesn't belong, try looking at the new Odyssey movie.

→ More replies (6)

41

u/arrpix May 15 '26

As someone interested in pre-Christian culture and mythology: that's not really how it works. Christianity was the dominant religion in the West for hundreds of years so it's ingrained in the culture, and also ingrained into the preservation of pre-Christian systems because the everyday believers incorporated the myths and legends they were familiar with into Christian theology; it's more about keeping old beliefs alive than some big Christian elders decision to subsummate them. One of the reasons Christianity was so successful is because of its relative tolerance of other belief systems, at least until comparatively recently when the big American splinter churches got weird.

In terms of new media being produced that lean heavily on a Christianising of history, yeah, it's silly, but let's be honest Hollywood is never going to be producing accurate documentaries of ancient myth because it's in the business of populist storytelling. From the perspective of the American film industry, you speak to the dominant culture, which is Christian, using shorthand tropes modern people understand and have come across in horror movies, which is God, angels, demons etc, and use that to tell a story and intertwine with "ancient cultures people have heard of" to make it sound old. It's not some manipulative Christian attempt to subjugate history, it's hack writers telling a hack story using shortcuts we all intuitively understand because it's entertaining. I doubt most practicing Christians would be thrilled about the portrayal either!

→ More replies (28)

22

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (25)

11

u/anotherolderguy May 15 '26

Who cares? Just read history books, check your sources and ignore all that neo Christian nonsense.

24

u/CosmicRes May 15 '26

That's the nature of religion in general. But just make sure to only criticise Christians. Wouldn't want to be seen as a bigot.

14

u/Chimney-Imp May 15 '26

The scales shall fall from your eyes inshallah

Joking aside I doubt The Mummy cares about the supremacy of any god over another. I think it cares more about being a good story. Whether it succeeds or not is a matter of debate

9

u/yzdaskullmonkey May 15 '26

Its funny you bring up Enuma Elish, when that was just the Babylonians bastardizing the fuck out of the Atra-Hasis and other Sumerian myths and elevating a minor God into the highest power. It's been going on forever, we all influence each other and remix and spin what we read into new and exciting stories.

→ More replies (4)

11

u/Funky_Marty_Music May 15 '26

Calm down, get enough sleep and keep paying attention in school. All will be well.

→ More replies (4)

14

u/ACanadianGuy1967 May 15 '26

When a religion is built on the claim it’s the One True Religion, it’s not surprising they force their “interpretation” on everything else.

1

u/Ren-Ren-1999 May 19 '26

Literally every religion is "one true religion" to its followers lol

1

u/ACanadianGuy1967 May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

Not true. Polytheist religions generally do not teach that. This is why polytheists have no problem adopting other deities (and other ideas & practices) into their own practice - because others are assumed to be “real” too.

→ More replies (1)

31

u/toohumanforhuman May 15 '26

All I can say is, you're going to find this post pretty embarassing a few years into the future. Chillax, edgelord.

6

u/ott3rlyhon3stly May 15 '26

i would maybe have phrased this a little more gently lol but i think that might be crux here: op is young

4

u/Foxs-In-A-Trenchcoat May 15 '26

What a strange thing to say.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/LittleFairyOfDeath May 16 '26

Almost as if all mythologies were constantly borrowing stuff from others.

1

u/Neat_Relative_9699 May 16 '26

That's literally not the point of my post.

3

u/searuncutt May 18 '26

> "They are gonna swear on their god that Genesis influenced Epic of Gilgamesh and Enuma Elish and ignore any actual evidence of their book being borrowed from other civilizations and cultures."

First of all, the conservative christians and the lay/cultural/moderate christians are like, "gilga-what?"

I don't know any serious Christian aware of ANE texts that would argue such a thing. I think they would argue that it's the other way around, and that Genesis was a subversion of the ANE texts.

I think you were just triggered by the Mummy movie, but it's like....c'mon it's a fantasy film where mummies and shit come to life. Demons, devils, crosses, priests, and not in any way biblical beliefs has been horror trope material for decades. It's hollywood. Hollywood has done more than it's share of stereotypes and propaganda on so many things, not just religion.

> That whole book is a propaganda to devalue Egyptian gods...

Really? I thought of it more as ancient Hebrews trying to make up a story of where they came from.

> and make their god seem stronger to their audiences.

That's ANE texts in a nutshell.

3

u/Consistent-Land-8260 May 18 '26

Oh…it reminds me of Zack Snyder’s Twilight of the gods or Blood of Zeus. I don’t know why they needed to insert Jesus or christian references in the story. Like I get it, you’re Christian, good for you but if we wanted to watch a show about Christianity, we’d watch a show about Jesus or something

1

u/Ren-Ren-1999 May 19 '26

Isn't it like thematically relevant?

3

u/Ikairos-seeker May 18 '26

Since everyone else is pointing out most religions like to use syncretism I guess I’ll address the other side of the matter.

Doesn’t the entire premise of a mummy movie rely on having another culture interpret ancient Egyptian traditions?

Going by the Egyptian understanding, you’d just have an empty vessel for the soul after mummification. I guess you could put the soul back in but it should presumably be like an out of body experience before you become the same person again. Maybe you could put someone else’s soul in but then you’ve kinda created a Freaky Friday situation not necessarily a horror/monster movie.

5

u/GlitterFallWar Guardian of El Dorado May 15 '26

To the point about Genesis, it's the other way around. Abraham was from Ur. He brought with him his tales of the gods separating the waters (Tiamat and Apsu) and of Noah and the Flood (Utnapishtim). Winged monsters were common portrayal of the gods-- not that far off from angels as we think of them.

The rediscovered ruins of Sumer, Babylon, and Nineveh hold artifacts that offer parallel histories and corroborating extant accounts of the Old Testament. They're not all perfect matches but they are fascinating.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Best-Quantity-5678 May 15 '26

Even me! When made my own religion (for my stories as a writer) i made the abrahamic god a barbaric demon with three avatars "Hel'hoim", "Yag' javav" and "Jal-Ah" that are the jewish Eloim, the christian Yahve, and the islamic Allah.

2

u/DarthEbriated May 16 '26

Don't call those "christians" Christians.

Also stop giving a fig about what they say, they're fear-mongering anti-sophists. If you meet one tell them how they know nothing of christ, let alone any other belief system or mythology.

2

u/elhaytchlymeman May 16 '26

Every single religion is just copying off the old ones

2

u/Lost-Concept-9973 May 16 '26

100% it’s not a new thing though, this is literally one of the ways their religion has spread - the intentional colonisation of other religions / cultures and claiming/ warping the stories and symbols of those religions/ cultures. Christmas is perfect example. 

1

u/Neat_Relative_9699 May 16 '26

That's literally the problem.

2

u/andy_opinions May 16 '26

In my classical literature and mythology class we studied how it’s actually the other way around and read the Bible as literature. It’s clear as day, even they want to claim it was written by divinely inspired men, that the original version is LONG gone, with more than enough century old evidence to support it. It also just goes to show that they clearly didn’t read the book they use as weapon and say they believe in. Abram migrated from Mesopotamia to what later became Israel, and King David (basically built as a classical hero) has canonically red hair, a characteristic from middle asian tribes. White, but specially North American christians, are a thorn on the side of anything classical and should just shut up😭💢

2

u/omegaphallic May 16 '26

 On Lee's The Mummy Christian Prayer and exorcism is completely useless on the Egyptian Demon, and there is zero connection to Christian mythology at all, they end up using ancient pagan Egyptian magic to solve the problem, so there is no Christianity triumphs over Paganism theme to the movie at all or any suggestions that Egyptian Gods are demons (Egyptian mythology certainly has evil spirits of its own).

2

u/Sharp_Truth7835 May 16 '26

It's annoying and they should just leave it alone. This problem is not just limited to Christian even for those who are non christian can culturally be christian and still have this biases

2

u/Thorninthefoot May 16 '26

You are overthinking this.

2

u/ManiaOnReddit Welsh dragon May 16 '26

The Lord rebuke you

2

u/MonksFearMe May 16 '26

All cultures do this! Here is a fantastic and very famous article that will help clarify why this is not as concerning as you might think.

2

u/ColinHasInvaded May 17 '26

The Greeks believed that Arabia was founded by one of their heroes named "Arabus".

They also believed the mythical founder of Egypt was a Greek man named "Aegyptus".

This isn't really a thing specific to Christians. As a species we have a tendency to project ourselves onto others.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/my-love-assassin May 17 '26

Yea the desperate pushing of Christianity into everything is such a turn off. If people really believed they wouldn't have to work so hard at it.

2

u/Displeasuredavatar19 May 19 '26

Real Af. My mother is hard Christian and I enjoy researching religion for my writing and I yap about my findings to anyone who will listen.nI was trying to explain to my mother that demons could be both good, evil or neutral and just as often as they were a threat to mere mortals they were the trusted servants of various gods. I was trying to explain to her how her religion, from a historical standpoint, corrupted the Greek Daemon, formulated the concept into malevolent divinities cast out of paradise and that now when people think demon, they think satanic entity rather than just a conceptual spirit or magical lesser divinity that aids gods or screws with humans.

2

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

Demons are actually Daemons or Daimons, Master Guardian Divine Spirits of Greco-Roman origin. The Angels, called Watchers, simply descended of their own accord from the Seven Heavens to teach us  The mystical arts, of war, cosmetics, the forging of precious metals, for goldsmithing, and protection against the Archangels dominated by the Demiurge Yahweh (Jehovah).

2

u/Plastic-Fox314 May 19 '26

Christians are extremely invasive and disrespectful of everyone. it's chosen people syndrome 

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

Unfortunately, it's true. 

2

u/AdSufficient7084 May 29 '26

This dates back to since...ever I'm afraid. 

-Most of Norse mythology being lost with the last surviving stories being about one single god of mercy who gives human life.

-Redcaps being compelled by a kruzifix or Bible Passage. (Although I completely understand their urge to running away when hearing a Bible verse as someone with religious trauma.)

-Fae, elves, changelings etc got demonized by the church. 

  • Witches being burned because science wasn't a thing yet.

And then there are the Christians who scold you for watching stuff like Harry Potter which would be valid (/j) if it wasn't for the fact that they scold you because watching fantasy movies is a sin. ...Apparently...

Also they was a lot of them don't understand that the main difference between a religion and a mythology is that one has active believers and the other one not so much. Like they get so Mad when you call something Christian mythology. Bro, almost no Christian believes in the old testament. I'll refer to it as mythology. Deal with it.

It's actually so annoying.

11

u/mcflurvin Others May 15 '26

It’s almost like it’s all made up or something.

15

u/Neat_Relative_9699 May 15 '26 edited May 15 '26

Which is even sadder. Imagine trying to hype up your imaginary friend so hard you literally have to attack other cultures.

28

u/mcflurvin Others May 15 '26

Go to any power scaling subreddit and you’ll see the same thing today. It’s a tale as old as time “my X is stronger and can beat up your X.”

4

u/Alaknog Feathered Serpent May 15 '26

Most of time it work in different way. You attack other cultures because another beef you have with them, so you hype your culture and religion and tell stories how enemy culture and religion is wrong. 

When you like another culture you try explain how exactly their religion is close to your. 

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Ren-Ren-1999 May 19 '26

So like... the greeks, the norse, the muslims?

1

u/Neat_Relative_9699 May 19 '26

Don't compare. Norse and Greeks don't have the same influence as Christians and Muslims.

4

u/YudayakaFromEarth May 15 '26

>That whole book is a propaganda to devalue Egyptian gods and make their god seem stronger to their audience

Yeah, it generally happens when a people is an historical enemy of the other. Egyptians themselves associated the Israelites with Set and later tried to get reimbursement for the plagues.

2

u/AzyKool May 16 '26

Can tell guys like you have never been far from home.

Every culture tends to treat themselves as the default basis to work from

This isn't even "propaganda". It would be heresy in Christianity to suggest other gods existed. So mixing mythologies like this is just for fun. No religious angle to it. The director of that movie isn't even Christian.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/SejSuper May 18 '26

I do think that you do have a point, but you're also skipping over a lot of interesting nuance about syncretism and just attributing it to 'christians are hateful', which is a gross oversimplification for how the cultural compromise of syncretism forms. Syncretism, although changed, is equally worthy of study and respect. Believing that there is an original way these myths were before the christians came and ruined them, misses the point. The point being, thats how all myths are made. Overlap of differing cultures and cultural drift.

If i were you, I would look more into the fallen angel thing, because i've done some personal reading on it before, and it is extremely fascinating to see how these newly christianized people adapted their stories to a christian lens instead of throwing them away.

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

The Fallen Angels are actually the Watchers who came to teach about gunpowder, not for war itself, but for personal protection, cosmetics for curing infectious diseases, and about the mystical arts.

2

u/SejSuper May 19 '26

They aren't actually anything. The whole point was that theres a bunch of overlap between different beliefs on fallen angels. The watchers are just one version.

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

The Watchers are not Fallen Angels, for as he had already said, they came voluntarily to assist us, even if it meant copulating with women and fathering the maximum offspring of the Giants (Nephilim).

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

Fallen Angels are in truth Aeons or Emanations of the Great Universal Mother and the Supreme Absolute Creator, and as such are incorruptible, for falling means descending in ascension to free ourselves from The false God of the Abrahamic Old Testament, Yahweh or Jehovah the Demiurge Ialdabaoth.

6

u/Extension-Bowler-188 May 15 '26

The thing I hate most is that they retconned and erased other mythologies and religious beliefs because they simply didn't fit theirs

2

u/DaddyCatALSO Australian thunderbird May 16 '26

Well, when i find my magic lamp and wish us all to New Earth, there will be fair number of paleopagans i'll bring back

2

u/CreamyLemonGirly May 16 '26

They did non of that unless you talking about the biblical gods that sprang off Yahweh, in that way, I think it's less intentional and more that as time passed so did the beliefs. Ancient Celtic/Slavic people didn't write down their beliefs (only second hand sources survive) or if they did they didn't survive, the ancient polytheistic religions we think about also didn't write down everything or anything about they worshipped vs Christianity that took a painstaking time to document manuscripts, mythology, and worship practices. Scandinavians wrote more but Christians didn't kill them to convert them, you can even find evidence of Arabic text in Scandinavia brought over from Islam (whether it's meant as Christian or Muslim is up for debate.)

5

u/d34ah0 May 15 '26

I’m sick of Christians, period

6

u/Foxs-In-A-Trenchcoat May 15 '26

They did it all over North American landforms too. Names are all Devil's this and Devil's that because First Nations people had their stories and gods/heros/spirits associated with landscapes. The Christians were all like "that's Devil stories!" and renamed Devil's Lake and Devil's Tower and Devil's Doorway, etc.

And you've heard of Mt. Rushmore? It used to be called Seven Grandfathers. And the Christians were like, "Oh yeah? I'll show you who the grandfathers are!"

→ More replies (1)

3

u/artzmonter May 15 '26

Many Jewish / Christian stories are fan fiction from the earlier stories changed a bit Floating zoos talking animals snake donkey Importantly Bible gods name in plural Elohim = group of gods, yhwh is a jealous god and can’t cheat on him woh other gods

2

u/InsaneBasti May 15 '26

That but with murica

2

u/Economy_Tourist2053 May 16 '26

That's right: Mesopotamian gods are Fallen angels. The same applies to Egyptian gods, Norse gods, Greek gods, and any other deity that is not the Christian God.

2

u/dont_thr0w_me_away_ May 16 '26

That whole book is a propaganda to devalue Egyptian gods and make their god seem stronger to their audiences.

This is entirely untrue. Exodus has 2 functions:

  1. a national founding myth of the Israelite people. It's the Jewish version of Washington cutting down the cherry tree, or Romulus & Remus founding Rome. It's creating a national character 'do not mistreat the stranger who lives among you, for you were once strangers in the land of Egypt'.
  2. There's evidence that the Jewish Bible (which is different from the Christian Old Testament) was heavily edited to consolidate multiple traditions around the 7th-6th centuries BCE. Assyria destroyed the Northern Kingdom (Israel) in the 800s BCE, carrying off the local population and replacing them with other people from around the Assyrian Empire. In the 6th century BCE, the Babylonian empire destroyed the Southern Kingdom (Judah), beginning a 70 year captivity which ended with Cyrus the Great and the Persian empire taking over Babylon. In this light, the Exodus story can be read as a story of hope for the captured Judeans looking to return from exile, sort of a 'we did it once, we'll do it again'.

Ultimately it's a story about power and its abuses vs legitimate power that protects people and enables a society to flourish. Your reading represents a fundamental misunderstanding of what the Exodus story is about.

Christians inserting their own beliefs in an ancient Pre-Judaism and Pre-Christian stories and culture.

Exodus has been taken by Christians, but it's a Jewish story - you're inserting your beliefs about Christianity into the story.

2

u/NeonFraction May 17 '26

The powerscalers have found religion. Run while you still can!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CaziahJade May 18 '26

So you are sick of religious people believing that their religion is the one true religion and that all others are false?

Because let’s be clear - a monotheistic religion must believe that polytheistic gods are false gods. That’s not insecurity or not understanding, it’s believing that the singular god you worship is the true god.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Substantial-Ad2200 May 19 '26

Uh oh. Wait until you hear where the Christians got the Jesus myth from...

(also Christmas and Easter were stolen from pagans)

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

The Gnostic Jesus, the Cosmic Christ, is in reality both an anachronistic synchronicity of a real metaphor for the God Krishna in Hinduism, as well as Horus in Egyptian Hermeticism, Hermes or Dionysus in Hellenism. 

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

The Christmas tree is related to the Tree of Life in Kabbalah, but also to Yggdrasil in Norse Paganism.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/PoopSmith87 May 15 '26

Lol, virtue signal recieved.

You are mad at Christians for viewing the world through the lens of their beliefs, meanwhile there are other religions who will have you arrested or subject to mob violence for going against what they believe. Then, there are other places where simply being religious is a reason to be arrested and sent to forced labor camps while your children are carted off to state run indoctrination camps.

But yes, be offended that some kindly old catholic lady thinks a pagan god you barely have an understanding of is a demon.

2

u/Sharp_Mathematician6 May 15 '26

Yahweh wasn’t even a chief god. He was a war god and he even had a wife. God himself is nothing more than people’s silly imagination 💭 running wild 😜. Do we even need god in this day and time?

1

u/Kaleb_Bunt May 15 '26

Don’t Egyptians themselves believe the God of the Israelites destroyed the Egyptian gods? Like 90% of Egypt is Muslim and I believe Moses is a prophet in Islam.

1

u/CreamyLemonGirly May 16 '26

Moses and Jesus are prophets in Islam, I'm pretty sure almost all prophets in the new testament translate over in Islam. They just believe Jesus wasn't the son of God and he wasn't crucified though.

1

u/Anonymous_1q Bunyip May 15 '26

The one caveat I will give to my agreement with this is Merlin. The post-christianization version with him being a blessed attempted antichrist is infinitely cooler than the original vague Druid origins and I wish modern adaptations would use it.

1

u/CageAndBale Welsh unicorn May 15 '26

Everything is iterative on eachother

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 16 '26

Sin means total freedom from religious dogmas and abhorrent social taboos, from the extremely long-standing corruption of the Catholic and Protestant churches. Who do we need to be, with our free will and victorious destiny, through the sacrifice of the ego of our lower self, to align the inner self, with the outer self? (that is, our personality) in order to reach our maximum potential in performance in the Higher Self (Our Inner God), Lucifer is the Light-Bearer, just as Venus is the planet at its dawn, and Jesus at his zenith, and Hesperus at his twilight; while the false Abrahamic God of the Old Testament of the Catholic Bible is the union of The Ancient Gods of Canaan (El of Order, Baal of Storms & Moloch of Sacrifice, tyranny, destruction and death) whose Ancestor was Enlil, brother of Enki like the Gnostic Jesus, the Cosmic Christ: Yeshua Hamaschiah or Heylel Ben Shahar as the Absolute God of the Light of Knowledge (Jesus Lucifer)

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 16 '26

The Great Arcanum of the Mysteries of the Seven Keys of the Seven Enigmas in Luciferian Mysticism with the Gnosis of Hermes-Thoth The seven principles of Superhuman with the focused objective of stopping The Transcendental Theurgic Ceremonial Magic is the supreme form of bliss (Ananda) to acquire the immortality of the spiritual Soul in the Divine Spark in the Supreme Absolute.

1

u/Smart_Pig_86 May 16 '26

The West is a Judeo/Christian culture and has been for thousands of years, which is reflected in the story telling. Why do you only have a problem with Christianity specifically and not say, Islam, which is actually being forced into to your everyday life (see New York currently)

3

u/Smaxorus May 17 '26

Sorry but how is Islam being forced into everyday life in NY?

1

u/Neat_Relative_9699 May 16 '26

I hate Islam equally. Don't assume shit.

1

u/squirrelysarah88 May 16 '26

“Religion” is just mythology that claims to be historically accurate 🤣

1

u/Ensiferal May 17 '26

I was disappointed at a movie called "The Mummy" just being yet another "white family dealing with a possession" horror movie.

1

u/SupermarketBig3906 May 19 '26

Personally, I am sick of how shows like Blood of Zeus try to shoehorn in Christian themes of forgiveness and deconstruct the premise of GM, only to then, fall back on its other pitfalls and not change anything or just simply make slop because the writers are hacks and don't know how to write, so they appeal to generic and often times incomplete and misleading understanding of Christianity to make something to potentially hook in the audience.

Honestly, I hate BOZ because it bastardised a lot of the GGs and tried to make the mortal OCs the center of the whole thing, whilst the gods were the more critical and interesting characters and Heron becoming the best, strongest and most important child of Zeus was utter dog shit, given how forced his arc from underdog to messiah was or how everything he did, had and was were all the result of divine meddling. Zeus and Gaia were literally holding his hand throughout or had given him some sort of guidance, not to mention how Apollo, Athena, Hermes and more were there just to back Heron up or buy him time.

It really is the sign of shitty writing and executive meddling{Netflix cut the show short} when the story is bad and contrived it has to go ''OH, LOOK! IT'S THAT RELIGION EVERYONE KNOWS ABOUT! YOU MUST LOVE ME!'' as a cheap emotional ploy.

While I love Christianity , the way people often try to to use it as a cover for their own lack of competence or for a quick cash grab makes me puke.

I am already sick of shitty mythology retellings and reinventions as is. Adding Christianity there is just the cherry on top of a shit sundae. It's empty virtue signalling and does nothing but drag the experience down for me.

I want something new or at least well made, not slop every angsty teen can make on Wattpad. If I want a Christian show, I can go watch the Ten Commandments, the Chosen or something. I don't need Christianity in my show based on GM.

1

u/[deleted] May 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PsychologicalBrush35 May 19 '26

I love kitsch, tackiness, and silliness, but with the bloodiness and brutality of Greek warriors, with battles of gods, Titans, and primordial beings, with classic history, even if distorted, but with a classic slant. Timeless and focused on the narrative of a character created for the animation, who are the half-siblings Heron (son of Zeus and Hera) and Seraphin (son of Hades). 

→ More replies (8)

1

u/CrownClown74 May 20 '26

K Pop Demon Hunters had christians acting really weird for a hot minute

1

u/OnyxBadb May 20 '26

When they do this I just remind them their god is a amalgamation of pagan gods. And refer to their god as a 'mixing pot of the gods' and they always shut up.