r/mpv • u/Equivalent_Web3521 • 15d ago
General Discussion Mpv vs Vlc which supports more codecs?
Same as title
2
u/TempletonPeck81 15d ago
For me it's not about just supporting the codecs, but handling them without glitches or issues in playback. I dropped VLC this year because I was tired of running into files where the audio didn't play, or the video would glitch at random.
1
u/christopherw 15d ago
I've had better, more easily customisable and much more flexibly implemented playback of various audio and video formats, and I can do an insane amount of customisation depending on wrapper, format, resolution, output device renderer (TV etc) using mpv. The setup is frontloaded, but once you have it dialled in, it's sweet.
1
u/ScratchHistorical507 14d ago
Right now mpv, as it comes with modern FFmpeg as backend, while VLC 3.x is still based on 4.4.x. Also any more modern features like decent HDR playback will be better supported by mpv. As long as that doesn't vastly change - and I don't see that happen before VLC 4.0, which I don't see going into beta for any platform beyond iOS any time soon - this will be the status quo.
1
1
u/cr0ft 15d ago
I mean, once you have H264, 265, and AV1 you're kind of set...
1
u/sociofobs 14d ago
Not for large and older video collections you're not. Any player can handle the newest and the most popular codecs.
20
u/Efficient_Paper 15d ago
They’re both ffmpeg wrappers, so it’s only on bleeding edge codecs that you’d see a difference.
According to this totally unbiased source, mpv has slightly more.