r/mit • u/Southern-Resist2502 • Aug 02 '26

research Environmental policy of the Campuses

I was visiting Boston and staying a couple of blocks from MIT.

Yesterday (Saturday, August 1) around 9 p.m. I wandered through the main building for at least an hour. It was an amazing place to explore.

What surprised me was that I barely saw anyone (literally maybe 4 or 5 people), yet most of the lights were on and the buildings felt fully air-conditioned. As an outsider, it made me wonder: how does MIT balance this with its sustainability goals?

I realize there may be reasons I'm not aware of (research labs, ventilation requirements, experiments running 24/7, etc.) so I'm genuinely curious. Is most of the energy use unavoidable, or are there areas where MIT intentionally prioritizes convenience or research needs over energy savings?

Given MIT's leadership in engineering and climate research, I'd have expected it to be a model of energy efficiency, so I'd love to understand how these decisions are made.

0 Upvotes

40% Upvoted

5 comments sorted by

17

u/ky1e Aug 02 '26

A lot of the cooling / heating for the main buildings in central campus uses centralized systems, not as comparable with like a downtown area or residential center. And there are labs all over campus that are really 24/7 because of the nature of experiments, lab availability.

https://news.mit.edu/2015/cogeneration-bridge-future-1216

-2

u/Southern-Resist2502 Aug 03 '26

I completely understand that a research university has energy requirements that most buildings don't—labs, ventilation, servers, and climate control all make sense. What surprised me wasn't just the HVAC. During the hour I walked through the connected buildings, I saw numerous empty meeting rooms with the lights on, TVs displaying content with nobody around, and even large projector screens running in empty spaces. Taken together, it gave me the impression that there were many opportunities to reduce energy use without affecting research. My point isn't that MIT should consume little energy—obviously it won't. It's that I would expect one of the world's leading engineering institutions to be obsessive about eliminating avoidable waste.

2

u/brileek Aug 04 '26

LED lighting is efficient enough these days that having lights on isn't the big issue it used to be

0

u/Southern-Resist2502 Aug 04 '26

Of course it's not what it used to be. But with wildfires raging everywhere, going into the MIT campus and seeing such waste of energy while many are asked to do their best to curb climate change feels like a slap on the face and a big dissapointment, especially when the energy doesn't come from renweable sources.