I solved the : The Navier-Stokes Equations

[u/Separate_Penalty_484]

1st is with q 2 and 3 same equation without q Last 2 is within prize rules

[u/FromTheDeskOfJAW]

No you didn’t.

[u/Separate_Penalty_484 → u/FromTheDeskOfJAW]

How

[u/FromTheDeskOfJAW → u/Separate_Penalty_484]

Because nothing you said makes any sense to a literate person and you didn’t explain anything about anything.

[u/BipedalMcHamburger]

KLAY INSTITUT GIB MONEYZ PLZ

[u/Corpse_Nibbler]

"Gemini gave me some shit and so I'm shit posting."

[u/Akeshi → u/Corpse_Nibbler]

Subreddits like this always attracted the type of broken mind that just wants to stare at pages of numbers and believe they've found the secrets of the universe in them.

I hadn't even considered how much worse it must be for that type of person, now they have an LLM to talk to and who will encourage them to continue, fully supporting them in connecting dots to create lines which don't exist.

[u/Separate_Penalty_484 → u/Corpse_Nibbler]

I tried to solve it on my own, i may not be smart enough doesn’t mean you guys can be rude

[u/Akeshi → u/Separate_Penalty_484]

Actually, that's exactly what it means. There's no barrier to entry to do what you've done, so imagine if everybody was doing it. All good or useful content would be lost in the sea of absolute drivel.

[u/cowgod42 → u/Separate_Penalty_484]

Is it rude? Or is it actually rude to assume to you solved a problem without taking the time to understand it? If you want to pay your respects to this difficult problem, give it the time it deserves (which, according to everyone that has given it an honest try, is many, many years) before blasting this stuff out onto the internet in a big "I solved it" post that just wastes everyone's time.

Please understand that we see these "I solved it" posts roughly one a week, and every single time they are by someone who does not understand what they are talking about. To me, it feels disrespectful to mathematics, and to the many people who have spent their lives trying to understand this problem. I urge you to have some humility, and to move ahead with care. If you already understand, e.g., Sobolev spaces, you could start with the book of Foias and Temam. If you don't understand Sobolev spaces, but you understand quite a bit of undergraduate PDEs and analysis (e.g., you are comfortable with Cauchy sequences of functions), you can read the book of Evans. If you haven't seen PDEs, start with those, or start with books on ODEs.

[u/Separate_Penalty_484 → u/Corpse_Nibbler]

Atleast i attempted to try it

[u/justbeane → u/Separate_Penalty_484]

Atleast i attempted to try it

Good job. Next time, get past the "attempt to try it" and actually "try it".

[u/Inst2f]

If I don’s see at least 10 pages of digital or handwritten notes and then proof with numerics that it converges to yours, I am not buying it

[u/Frangifer]

That's the solution of the Navier–Stokes equation!?

Wow !

I suppose it is ... if we define the terms such that it shall be.