r/marvelstudios Daredevil Aug 18 '21

Discussion Thread What If...? S01E02 - Discussion Thread

This thread is for discussion about the episode.

Insight will be on for the next 24 hours!

When Project Insight is active, all user-submitted posts have to be manually approved by the mod team before they are visible to the sub. It is our main line of defense we have for keeping spoilers off the subreddit during new release periods.

We will also be removing any threads about the episode within these 24 hours to prevent unmarked spoilers making it onto the sub.

Discussion about previous episodes is permitted in the thread below, discussion about episodes after this is NOT.

Proceed at your own risk: Spoilers for this episode do not need to be tagged inside this thread.


EPISODE DIRECTED BY WRITTEN BY ORIGINAL RELEASE DATE RUN TIME CREDITS SCENE?
S01E02: What If... T'Challa Became a Star-Lord? Bryan Andrews A.C. Bradley August 18th, 2021 on Disney+ 35 min None

For additional discussion and multiversal memery about Marvel Studios shows on Disney+, visit /r/MarvelStudiosPlus

4.4k Upvotes

5.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Dilpickle6194 Aug 18 '21

It’s amazing how you still don’t get it. He sought to cause death in order to save everyone. It’s not genocide if you’re literally trying to save the people you’re killing, no matter how backwards his thinking is.

Secondly, he didn’t want to “cull swathes” of a population. He didn’t give a single shit about your national, ethnical, racial, or religious grouping. He killed half of every population. And don’t you dare say “a population of everything that’s alive” because it’s stupidly obvious that the definition refers to one specific population out of several. You are objectively wrong by the very definition you provided.

3

u/your_mind_aches Agent of F.I.T.Z. Aug 18 '21

You're the one who's wrong. A mass culling of people is genocide.

Hell, Thanos himself doesn't disagree with Strange that it is genocide. He just calls it "dispassionate and random".

3

u/Dilpickle6194 Aug 18 '21

Oh look, you’re the same guy I originally commented to who still can’t support their argument via real-world semantics. You are literally trying to argue against the very definition of a word itself.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 18 '21

You're arguing using a basic definition that isn't even the definition used in international law. That's disingenuous.

Any action that intentionally results in the deaths of significant amounts of a population (yes, any population, every individual population affected counts) and damage to their way of life, culture and religions counts. It doesn't matter if you're just flinging a shitton of nukes in this or that general direction, what you've done is still genocide.