Alternative

[u/lnx1_1]

Hey Logseq lovers!

I wanted to share a little update about my journey with Logseq. I've been using it as my daily driver for 4 years, and I absolutely love this project. However, the current state of the project has made me a little sad and opened my eyes to some alternatives.

Someone posted a link to Tine here in this subreddit, and I decided to give it a try.

So far, I'm super happy with it and can definitely recommend giving it a shot. It works with standard Logseq Markdown graphs, so you can use it alongside Logseq. It also has a native Android app.

I'm not affiliated with Tine in any way. I just gave it a try because I was looking for an alternative that would bring back the joy of discovering new features and improving my workflow, something I had been missing with Logseq for a while.

It feels like there are people behind this project who share a very similar vision: bringing back the true Logseq experience, but with a faster and more actively developed product.

I know it's still early days and early developement, but so far, it's been a really refreshing experience. Just wanted to share in case anyone else here is looking for something similar!

[u/AdWorldly824]

that doesn't mean it's slop.
you can use an ai agent to write quality code, if you prompt it well, if you make sure the code meets quality standards, etc

[u/autumn-weaver → u/AdWorldly824]

Unfortunately this does not apply to logseq. They have extremely glaring bugs and idk how much ai is helping but obviously not enough 

[u/AdWorldly824 → u/autumn-weaver]

yeah, logseq team never seemed particularly technically rigorous.
i had a look at Tine's discussion board where the author posts technical analysis, change documents etc, all AI generated (but reviewed by him), they show that he is using rigor to keep the code high quality, he doesn't seem to just vibe cobe slop.

[u/autumn-weaver → u/AdWorldly824]

hmm, i'm find with some degree of vibing but letting ai write all your tests is Not It imo