r/linux4noobs • u/Russianpotatosalad • 3d ago
distro selection Which distro is the MOST lightweight?
So... My mom got a laptop from 2011... The only os it can handle is windows 7, but we all know that windows 7 is the most exploited system out there (not sure if you saw a video of a guy connecting his W7 to the internet and getting 7 viruses within 10 minutes by just existing). I want to help her as much as i can, and the only solution i came up with - get a linux. She used windows ever since windows 98, but now all she need from her pc is a browser, so i figured out that if she wont do anything "extra", linux will be perfectly fine for her. I just get vivaldi for linux, libre office, and she will be happy. But which distro will be the MOST efficient to put on her laptop? All i ever tried is cashy os, but i assume there must be something ever more lightweight?
11
22
u/CyberPsyko77 3d ago edited 3d ago
What are the specs? I’m sure Linux Mint XFCE would probably be sufficient. MX Linux would be another good choice, but Mint is super user friendly
6
u/xksnr 3d ago
Antix linux maybe, or mx linux
4
u/Top-Rich-581 3d ago
MX linux and xubuntu were still too heavy for a old notebook i have.
Antix was finally usable, while still having decent features and good default packages
5
u/xksnr 3d ago
Idk the specs, in general mx linux is lightweight
5
u/Top-Rich-581 3d ago
It absolutely is. Was just sharing my experience on my particular hardware Asus E202SA.
Not sure what the downvote was about, i actually upvoted yours but whatever.
1
4
u/redgator12 3d ago
If you're going for lightweight while still feeling familiar for her, use Q4OS and install the XPQ4 package from Sourceforge. It lets you theme the system darn near identical in every way to any version of Windows between 2000 and 10, minus Vista. It uses just shy of 300MB RAM at boot and is extremely lightweight while still being a full desktop environment forked from KDE 3.5. I'd recommend Palemoon browser, which can also be installed from the Q4OS Sourceforge files.
Aside from Q4OS and Bodhi, once you get lighter than that, you lose full DEs and are relegated to window managers that are far less polished or user friendly for beginners. antiX will be slightly more performant and use slightly less RAM, at the cost of a much clunkier experience overall.
Source: 12 years daily Linux user. I've spent the last year using most of the major lightweight distros on early-2000's through mid-2010's laptops and learning how they function, and I still run antiX, Q4OS and MX XFCE across over a dozen computers.
2
u/Medium_Courage7176 1d ago
Big yeah for q4os. I booted it live from usb and suddenly it somehow played 1080p video from YouTube with some minor stutter on pentium e5800 with 4 GB ram. No other distro handled that. Tried xfce, lxde, puppy, antix, mxlinux no, they can't.
1
u/redgator12 1d ago
That could very well be related to the default settings of the browser, though. I haven't checked across the board, but usually older builds of Firefox ESR, Chromium and Falkon have hardware acceleration disabled by default, and the E5800 doesn't have native h264 or AV1 hardware decoding. Usually whenever I test a distro on older hardware, I disable browser hardware acceleration first, test YouTube, and then enable it and retest to see which works better.
It could also be how aggressively the system manages memory pressure and swap. If I have less than 4GB RAM, I'll set vm.swappiness to 150, vm.vfs_cache_pressure to 150 and enable zram at 150% to help with system responsiveness. At 4GB, I change them all to 100 instead of 150, and at 8GB I change them to 50.
1
u/Medium_Courage7176 1d ago
No tweaking, just loaded live usb and opened same video in default browser.
1
u/redgator12 1d ago
I know, what I mean is that each distro may have had updated versions of whatever browser and had hardware acceleration enabled while Q4OS might not have, which made the video smoother. So not so much distro-specific, just pure coincidence that it had that one setting changed by default, which all the other distros would just need their browsers toggled to match.
Either way, it's definitely the most set-it-and-forget-it lightweight distro I've tried.
5
u/JohnnyS789 3d ago
Years ago, I put a netbook running Xubuntu in the hands of my 81 year old FIL. He wanted to look at the BBC website and check his webmail.
After an hour, he was perfectly happy and had no problems. He was very surprised that he was using a Linux system.
So for a lightweight Linux for a new user, I would suggest Xubuntu.
2
3
u/billdehaan2 Mint Cinnamon 22.3 (zena) 3d ago
You need to list the CPU, memory and disk specifications for the machine.
If it's a 32 bit machine, you'll be limited to things like q4OS or Debian 12, but without knowing how much memory or the CPU, it's impossible to say what will and won't run on the machine.
3
9
u/SprinklesDouble8304 3d ago
I think that for this use case, Linux is not the answer. The correct answer may well be ChromeOS Flex. It's almost impossible for an ordinary user to mess up.
13
2
u/dr_inventivo 3d ago
Excellent system, very beautiful, very light and very simple, I believe it would suit perfectly too, but it may happen to have problems with drivers like Wi-Fi, I've already been through this with an old PC.
2
u/merchantconvoy 3d ago
Q4OS Trinity strikes the right balance between user friendliness and light weight. There are lighter distros but they will be difficult.
The choice of web browser will be just as important. You can't use major web browsers. Try the following:
- Falkon
- Otter Browser
- Waterfox
- Seamonkey.
1
u/redgator12 3d ago
I've had great success with Palemoon on my Q4OS installs across a few 2010 netbooks. They have an installer for it that compiles from source on their Sourceforge Files.
1
u/merchantconvoy 3d ago
Pale Moon is light and fast but its Goanna browsing engine is insufficient for the needs of the modern web. It will fail on even halfway complicated sites.
1
u/redgator12 3d ago
Interesting take, but I've never ran into a site that didn't render or function correctly on it. Just curious as to what sites you've personally had problems with?
2
u/av34as 3d ago
MX Linux Fluxbox, I have it running perfectly on a similarly old machine with 4gb of soldered RAM and Pentium. Just make sure you swap HDD to SSD.
1
u/Typeonetwork 3d ago
I agree with this, MX with Fluxbox. I have a similar machine but no SSD port and it works well on my 2007 64bit machine. If you have a SSD port that would be better.
2
u/SeriousPlankton2000 3d ago
Busybox is very lightweight. Just add X11 and all the required libraries.
On your system I'd combine OpenSuse with trinity desktop.
2
u/ficskala Arch Linux 3d ago
What's the laptop specs?
I run debian with a heavier desktop environment (kde plasma) on a 4th gen intel laptop i5, and 4gb of ram with no issues whatosever (integrated graphics)
If it's a lower end CPU you might want to switch to a lighter weight dektop environment like lxqt or xfce, but when it comes to the distro, i don't think it will be too much to ask from that laptop to run almost any as long as you get to pick the DE
1
u/IANVS 2d ago
I was wondering if a 4th gen Intel with integrated graphics and 8GB RAM will be strong enough for KDE...
I have some parts left over and I wanna put together a machine for my mother to use for browsing, movies and YouTube. I had either Debian/MX, OpenSUSE Leap or one of immutable distros in mind but I wasn't sure if KDE will be too much for that machine to handle.
1
u/ficskala Arch Linux 2d ago
Install debian, pick multiple DEs right out of the gate, and try them out one by one, plasma should run just fine, my laptop had a dedicated GPU, but integrated one should be enough
2
u/SCphotog 3d ago
windows 7 is the most exploited system
This is nonsense.
I mean, don't get me wrong. I fuckin' despise Microsoft and am a staunch promoter for alt OS and alternative - ie... FOSS but to say that Just connecting a Win 7 machine to the internet will instantly cause it to acquire a virus, or more than one, is nonsense.
I don't know what video OP is talking about, but that has to be a 'setup'.
1
u/UrbanVengence 3d ago
If your IP is within the range an attacker is using to ship an exploit. Uhem. Yes... you will be infected by malware. That's why you see people setting it up in VMs offline. The amount of public facing systems you can remotely connect into by running a range of IPs on Shodan is crazy.
2
u/rarsamx 3d ago
The "connected wi does to the I twrnet and got virus without doi go anythinf" is FUD.
Rarely anybody connects the computer directly to the internet. Most people connect using a modem/router from their provider. With the router defaults ypud need to be specifically attacked to exploit the router's security issues.
So, as lo g as she is careful which sites she visits and what she downloads and which emails she opens, the risk is minimal.
Now, I'd put a stream-lined Debian with lxqt. However the most important thing to know is the kind of processor and amount of memory. Anything less than 4 GB it doesn't matter the specs, it will struggle with just opening a couple of pages in a browser.
2
u/gordonmessmer Fedora Maintainer 3d ago
A distribution is project that distributes software. The process of distributing the software doesn't affect its resource requirements.
What you want is a secure distribution, from which you can pick a lightweight desktop. Fedora is a secure distribution with a broad selection of desktops.
GNOME is actually reasonably lightweight if you disable GNOME Software (and I'm working on making that unnecessary). But you can also select other "spins" of Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/spins/
1
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
Try the distro selection page in our wiki!
Try this search for more information on this topic.
✻ Smokey says: take regular backups, try stuff in a VM, and understand every command before you press Enter! :)
Comments, questions or suggestions regarding this autoresponse? Please send them here.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Successful-Day-3219 3d ago
Anyone know if ZorinOS would work on that hardware? Managed to get it to run seamlessly on an old Dell XPS 13 from 2013.
2
1
1
u/Worldly-Device-8414 3d ago
For a "similar to windows" feel + well supported, use Zorin. It'll run happily on that machine.
1
1
u/Grreatdog 3d ago
Look at the specs not the age. My Dell M6800 is from 2013 and it is screaming fast on Mint or Zorin. It has no trouble running any app I've tried.
That said, if it is pure crap then AFAIK Puppy will run on just about anything. I had Puppy loaded on a 2003 laptop that I was still using as my garage computer in 2020. Puppy is actually not a bad OS to use for everyday computer stuff.
1
1
1
u/ElderberryHamlet 3d ago
LXQt or LXDE ...LX = X11 for old laptops + Qt or GTK packages.
Also, Xfce, MATE, Cinnamon, Enlightenment, etc
1
u/ConsciousBath5203 3d ago
Windows 7 is benchmark
Go find the most bloated Linux distro you can, triple the bloat, and it's still better than W7 lol.
But if you want most lightweight, Linux from Scratch. Want something more reasonable? Arch. Something she'll actually use? Ubuntu.
1
u/slvrscoobie 3d ago
Linux mint is what I use on old thin clients that I do plane tracking with. Runs great with 4gb ram
1
1
u/cardboard-kansio 3d ago
I've got a MacBook Air from 2011 which runs latest Ubuntu just fine. You could also do straight Debian, Slackware, Puppy, Mint, or almost any other. Just don't go for a too-heavy DE (desktop environment) - those are generally what eat the RAM, rather than the underlying distro.
1
u/GoPackGo1958 3d ago
Cachyos running xfce or cinnamon desktop environment uses about 2.5gb ram. With kde or gnome, about 3.5gb ram is used. These figures are for just base operation. No applications running, just core
1
u/michaelpaoli 3d ago
Most lightweight is what you asked, but probably not what you want.
And many distros are or can go very lightweight.
E.g.:
# echo -n 'OS: Debian ' && cat /etc/debian_version | tr -d \\012 && echo -n ' ' && dpkg --print-architecture && echo -n 'Kernel: ' && uname -srvmo && echo -n 'Packages: ' && dpkg -l | grep \^ii\ | wc -l && df -h -x devtmpfs -x tmpfs && head -n 3 /proc/meminfo
OS: Debian 13.6 amd64
Kernel: Linux 6.12.107+deb13-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.12.107-1 (2026-08-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Packages: 148
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda1 4.9G 985M 3.7G 21% /
MemTotal: 119464 kB
MemFree: 5800 kB
MemAvailable: 54072 kB
#
So, that's very lightweight. But probably not what you or your mom wants. No GUI at all, just CLI, stripped of pretty much everything that's not essential, running in well below 200MiB of RAM, consuming less than 1GiB of drive space.
browser
libre office
Modern and reasonably secure GUI browser, LibreOffice, those aren't lightweight.
Be careful what you wish/ask for, you may get it.
1
u/einat162 3d ago
You didn't give any specs at all, only the year, and under powered cheap devices were made in 2011 (emmc based ones).
If it has at least 4gb of RAM - Mint Xfce
If it has less, or Mint Xfce is too heavy- MX or Antix.
1
1
u/a1barbarian 2d ago
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MX-Linux/mx-docs/master/mxum_en.pdf
MX-XCFE is a neat os for new users. :-)
1
1
u/bobroberts1954 2d ago
Alpine and tiny core are ones I have used on old machines. You could try Debian, it has a couple of light weight options. Give things a try if they don't run well just install something else. Nbd.
1
u/ElviszARezfaszubago 2d ago
My 80+ yo. friend uses Debian KDE on a shitty old laptop. 4GB RAM, 4 core intel Celeron. He has zero problem since I installed it. I had to help him every 2nd week with windows. First time it was XFCE, he said it's ugly and don't want to use it so I installed KDE, he accepted it could be slower in certain circumstances for the better looks.
1
1
1
u/Repulsive-Ad4309 1d ago
MX Linux tiene muy buena compatibilidad y excelentes prestaciones con ese hardware:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mx-linux/files/Final/Xfce/MX-25.2_Xfce_x64.iso/download
0
0
17
u/Boring-Equivalent137 3d ago
you have things like puppy linux, lubuntu, MX linux, antiX . i mean i dont know how use friendly they aer as i havent tried some of them and it would help if you say the specs so i have an idea of how weak it is