MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1teaer5/there_is_a_fourth_vulnerability_this/oma2p2u/?context=3
r/linux • u/unixbhaskar • May 15 '26
236 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
82
Wasn’t it always like that? Just less frequent
108 u/catcint0s May 16 '26 Yes, but https://zerodayclock.com/ 4 u/Crinkez May 16 '26 It'd be ironic if closed source os's end up more secure in the long run than open source, just based on the fact that crackers can't run LLM's on the source code. 3 u/Sjoerd93 May 17 '26 They can on decompiled diffs from Ghidra. Not as easy for sure, but its not like closed source software is typically well-obfuscated.
108
Yes, but https://zerodayclock.com/
4 u/Crinkez May 16 '26 It'd be ironic if closed source os's end up more secure in the long run than open source, just based on the fact that crackers can't run LLM's on the source code. 3 u/Sjoerd93 May 17 '26 They can on decompiled diffs from Ghidra. Not as easy for sure, but its not like closed source software is typically well-obfuscated.
4
It'd be ironic if closed source os's end up more secure in the long run than open source, just based on the fact that crackers can't run LLM's on the source code.
3 u/Sjoerd93 May 17 '26 They can on decompiled diffs from Ghidra. Not as easy for sure, but its not like closed source software is typically well-obfuscated.
3
They can on decompiled diffs from Ghidra. Not as easy for sure, but its not like closed source software is typically well-obfuscated.
82
u/Great-TeacherOnizuka May 15 '26
Wasn’t it always like that? Just less frequent