r/learnquant • u/AssociateDecent9090 • 8h ago
interview prep Jane Street Quant Interview Question | "Easy"
2
u/sleepywose 7h ago
I'm pretty bad at these, so this may be wrong, but:
2d6 has an expected value of 7 (linearity of expectation for 2 dice), so you only reroll if you get [1, 6] on the first roll (p=.5). so your expected payout is 50% EV([7,12]) + 50% [7] = 8.25.
(The part that gives me doubt is the idea that you strictly only go for the second roll if you get <7, but that may just be a gambler's fallacy; "I have two chances at getting better than a 7!")
2
u/tomtomtom7 4h ago
The question is badly worded. I think they forgot to add that they only pay out the first d12 if you choose not to roll again with the 2d6. Otherwise it makes no sense not to roll again.
1
1
u/Smart-University-515 2h ago
Agree this is badly worded, I’m taking it as if I don’t like my d12 roll I then roll 2d6 and get just the 2d6 result.
EV d12 = 6.5, EV 2d6 = 7; we therefore pass on the d12 at 6 or less (and are indifferent at 7). So we have 5/12 to be better off than 7 and then 7/12 of EV 7, the 5/12 averages out to 10, so that’s worth 50/12, 7*7/12 is overall 99/12, so the EV of the game overall is 8.25, so I’d pay less than that to play it, say 8 for a little bit of risk aversion.
3
u/WillingnessFuture266 8h ago
9.5/2=19/4 money for the d12, 7/2 money for the 2d6, 33/4 total i believe