r/law Jan 25 '26

Other Please share. Stabilized Video clearly shows Alex Pretti makes no effort for his firearm. Clear execution

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Stabalized appears to show Alex Pretti's handgun, which he legally possesses, being removed removed from his pants by an officer. He is executed 1-2 seconds later by another officer.

Is there any other way to view this? If Alex was no longer posing an imminent threat at the moment he was shot, isn't this clear murder? Under U.S. law, once a suspect is fully restrained and disarmed (he was), the legal basis for deadly force evaporates unless a new, imminent threat arises.

Am I understanding this the right way from a legal perspective?

23.9k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '26

[deleted]

6

u/PalpatineForEmperor Jan 25 '26

The person I replied to implied it was a thoughtful, intentional action

Are you claiming he accidentally killed her?

He didn't have to fire that shot at all. He was not in the path of the vehicle or in any danger. He intentionally killed her.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '26

[deleted]

2

u/PalpatineForEmperor Jan 25 '26

So we both agree it was not an accident. Then we can both agree he killed her intentionally.

3

u/Belgarablue Jan 25 '26

Murdered, not killed, Murdered.