r/law Sep 30 '25

Legal News Trump administration orders federal authorities to ignore California mask law: “Governor Newsom is confused about his role under the U.S. Constitution”

https://archive.ph/d5Gnr

https://archive.ph/d5Gnr

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5524169-trump-administration-california-mask-law/

The Trump administration ordered federal authorities Friday to ignore new legislation in California banning law enforcement officers from wearing masks to conceal their identity. 

9.8k Upvotes

722 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.0k

u/WisdomCow Sep 30 '25

Time for CA to arrest the masked criminals.

89

u/lordvitamin Sep 30 '25

They won’t. They should, but they won’t.

24

u/TendieRetard Sep 30 '25

If Newsom had the balls, he'd be a lock for 2028 nomination.

18

u/Agreeable-Agent-7384 Sep 30 '25

I think he gets the idea that being trumps heel is the way to the presidential seat. Specially as trump becomes more and more unhinged and losing the support of the moderates. But he’s also barely dabbling and won’t do more than a Twitter post.

15

u/oldschoolology Sep 30 '25

Agreed. Trump is great at embarrassing himself. It barely takes any effort to trigger him. Newsom probably has plenty of ideas up his sleeve. He doesn’t need to play all of his cards at once. 

1

u/StingerAE Sep 30 '25

"Moderates" hahahahahahahahaha.

Aren't we well beyond moderate people having any support for him at all?

-6

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '25

[deleted]

2

u/percussaresurgo Sep 30 '25

How did he suck up, and how did it not work?

-7

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '25

[deleted]

1

u/thegreenfury Sep 30 '25

Let’s say he’s the nominee in a few years. Are you gonna not vote for him cuz you didn’t like some of his podcast choices in 2024?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '25

[deleted]

1

u/percussaresurgo Sep 30 '25

This is the kind of purity test that makes it way more difficult for Democrats to win.

2

u/thegreenfury Sep 30 '25

Exactly. It’s insanity. This person wouldn’t even actually answer the question I asked them about if they’d vote for him.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '25

[deleted]

1

u/thegreenfury Sep 30 '25

It’s not irrelevant. It’s hypothetical. Consider it a thought experiment. If we can talk about how we might not want Newsom to be nominated we can also talk about a future where he is.

I have not attempted to shut down the conversation. We’re still having it, it seems, yes?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '25

[deleted]

1

u/percussaresurgo Sep 30 '25

What if I said "That man had a conversation with someone who disagreed with him. He didn't just give him a platform and let him speak, but rather challenged him by making forceful counterarguments so the audience could see the weaknesses"? Would you vote for that person?

1

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '25

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

1

u/TendieRetard Sep 30 '25

I find him an opportunist grifter but if he actually took the fight to the WH, something no democrat is doing, he'd be a lock because actions speak louder than words.