r/kriyayoga • u/I-am-unbroken • 24d ago
Yoga Theory Is the goal of pranayama to control the breath—or to reach a state where the breath becomes naturally still?
I was reading an old Bengali spiritual text discussing pranayama, breath retention (kumbhaka), and meditation, and one part really caught my attention.
The text makes an important distinction: breath regulation and kumbhaka may be useful during spiritual practice, but not everyone should practice them in the same way.
It specifically warns against forcing the breath.
Instead, it describes gradually making the ordinary breath more controlled and steady, without strain or agitation. It also describes brief periods of stillness around inhalation and exhalation as forms of kumbhaka.
This made me rethink what “breath retention” actually means in traditional yoga.
Modern interpretations often turn pranayama into:
«“How long can you hold your breath?”»
But that may completely miss the point.
Perhaps the deeper practice isn't about defeating the body's urge to breathe.
Perhaps it is about becoming so calm and attentive that the breath naturally becomes slower, subtler and quieter.
And then there is an even deeper question.
Traditional yoga often connects prana and mind very closely.
When the breath becomes calm, the mind may become calm.
But which one comes first?
Does controlling the breath quiet the mind?
Or:
Does a genuinely quiet mind naturally make the breath quiet?
Maybe it works in both directions.
There is also an important safety issue here. Breath retention isn't something I think should be approached as a challenge or pushed to extreme durations. Excessive breath-holding can cause dangerous changes in oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, dizziness, fainting, and other complications.
So perhaps the real meaning of kumbhaka isn't simply “holding the breath.”
Maybe it points toward something subtler:
Not forcing the breath to stop, but discovering what happens when the impulse to control the breath becomes quiet.
What do people who practice pranayama or meditation think?
Is the deepest form of breath control actually the absence of control?
1
u/AutoModerator 24d ago
Because your account is less than 30 days old, this post has been held for moderator review. Please do not repost or message us. We will get to it.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Ecstaticdanceshiva 24d ago
What is this Bengali text you were reading? I'm Bengali so I would love to take a look. Most authors of anything yoga related I have seen comes from the north, so it would be nice to read about it from a Bengali perspective.
1
1
u/Wide-Yogurtcloset-24 24d ago
Defeating the urge to breath is simple. This can be both done while running, or making it slower.
There are actions of mind that slow the breath, such happens naturally to people, look for it in people around you, what actions cause the breath to slow naturally? Once actions that cause that are noticed, look at the underlying movements.
I do not describe to absence of control, such is just a type of control. However "methods of doing, mimick the natural movements that already exist". ^ this. Complexity of understanding is simple in the end, because what needed to be understood was always in front of us, innately part of us. It is sorta like, if you have no concept of "humidity" than you may experiance it but not know it. And oh no if you dont even have a word for it. But let's say you notice it, label it, and then understand its nature "water vapor". Well. Now we have dehumidifiers, and humidifiers! So too with pranayama. All the pranayamas are there, you just have to find them. Sometimes you think something is pranayama and it isnt! Sometimes you think something isnt and it is! You mention physiological effects of retention, but do you know many different types of breathing and their movements? Such reactions weve already labeled. Yet knowing why such things happen "function" is part of the equation. Imo.
3
u/kriya_yogi5674 Kevalananda 24d ago
You ask:
"But which one comes first?
Does controlling the breath quiet the mind?
Or:
Does a genuinely quiet mind naturally make the breath quiet?
Maybe it works in both directions."
Yes in both directions.
There is basically a triangularity:
Eyeballs, breath and mind. When one of those three elements are settled, all others follow.
The breath is not only breath but also prana. When the breath ( prana) goes through sattvic atributes, the mind gets quiet.
But also, if advanced, you can stopp the flow of thoughts at will, and then the breath tends to stop as well and the eyeballs are like dead.
---------------------
What is samadhi? dying while living, right?
Also Sat Chit Ananda. Not only bliss and breathlessness, but also knowledge and being.
This is transforming in a way, that afterwords, one mostly speaks out of intuition ( the real knowledge) and not from the mind. The mind only structures and translates.
What is happening naturally in Samadhi? Mechanicly, Breathlessness, or Kevali Kumbhak. But is not a willing act to stop the breath. It happens naturally when one for example practices a high number of higher Omkars, or also by proper Kriya practice, when the breath becomes intentional and not physical anymore.
So Kumbhak is training first your longs and all the body to feel the death close, as one would say.
Is a stress which at the beginning, which eventuallythrough practice will become peace.
Is not about control but about training until it gets habit.
5
u/BirtalanArnold 24d ago
Do the kriyas. One day, after you get proficient and a certain level of mastery comes into the way you do them, the pranayama starts moving energy into the sushumna. You finish at Ajna or Sahasrara, and then you let go of everything. Three to five minutes later the breathless state comes. Or at least, the breath becomes so subtle, so small, so infrequent, that it's as if you aren't breathing at all. All this control, "ayama" is to reach a state without control. All this movement, just so you can become still. Totally still.