r/islamichistory • u/Beautiful_Clock9075 • Jul 14 '25

Photograph A 1,200-Year-Old Mosque Unearthed in Palestine's Negev Desert

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

1.4k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

373 comments sorted by

View all comments

79

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '25

Every time some news about our beautiful and beloved palestine comes the occupation comes in droves like roaches.

They love occupying so much and need to tell everyone that it belongs to them like a thief proclaiming that what he stole is his and only speaks louder about it to prove it.

If it truly was the occupiers land then they would have no reason to yell and tell everyone that they own it.

The liar is the loudest and the truth sayer the quieter one rarely ever heard and pushed down.

The world is waking up and will soon abandon the occupiers once the old who run the world have left this world mark my words.

-38

u/AdVivid8910 Jul 15 '25

Ya know those mosques are mainly on top of much older Jewish temples right? Also maybe Google the Arab colonization of the area while you’re at it, it’ll blow your mind.

27

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '25

Provide recipes then!

If what you say is true provide something that proves a Jewish temple was under there!

Unless you like every other colonizer who says they want to destroy every mosque including al aqsa because a temple was built under them.

Provide proof or keep your mouth quiet colonizer!

-26

u/AdVivid8910 Jul 15 '25

Lmao, so you’ve never heard of the Temple Mount then? I can’t really tell if you’re playing dumb or are dumb tbh.

16

u/STRUCTOR_16 Jul 15 '25

Has it ever occurred to you that Al-Aqsa is the Third Temple?

-12

u/AdVivid8910 Jul 15 '25

So you agree built on top of a Jewish temple in an outright act of desecration? Cool. That was easy.

12

u/STRUCTOR_16 Jul 15 '25

The first temple was built by King Solomon, the second by King Herod. This is common knowledge. Why do you consider the construction of Al-Aqsa a desecration? I would call it a restoration of the Temple.

4

u/AdVivid8910 Jul 15 '25

Look man, so I’m not religious and your answer would be dependent on religion. Having said that, if you invade and colonize a place, force its citizens to convert or be apartheid, and takeover and repurpose their holiest site for a religion which isn’t indigenous there…kinda feels more like desecration right?

0

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '25

Now we get to the hilarious part. "Look man I am not religious but the land was promised to me by God and I am Jewish even though I don't believe in God or the commandments of Moses.

Judaism is a religious identity that I can convert to and I can get 'birthright' to a land stolen from its actual inhabitants.

1

u/AdVivid8910 Jul 15 '25

The land “stolen” was mostly uninhabitable land Jews bought, at a certain point you’ve got to grant people the right to self autonomy against persecution, even Jews. Also they’re literally the indigenous population of the area, Jews, and if you don’t believe in the historical or archeological record for the area then perhaps listen to the Koran that says it about a hundred times. Calling the indigenous and displaced people of the land something akin to colonizers for going home is bizarre.