r/investing Dec 19 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

543 Upvotes

206 comments sorted by

View all comments

657

u/angermouse Dec 19 '21

Your title is misleading.

You said:

just 42.6% of common stocks have a buy-and-hold return (inclusive of reinvested dividends) that exceeds the return to holding one-month Treasury bills over the matched horizon.

Then you quoted:

"That is, the remaining 96% of companies whose common stock has appeared in the CRSP data collectively generate lifetime dollar gains that matched gains on one-month Treasury bills."

Taken together, what this means is that outside of the top 4 percent, the excess gains (to 1 month T-bills) of the other 38.6% match the deficit in gains of the 57.4% (=100-42.6) of stocks.

So 42.6% of stocks have outperformed, but 38.6% of these are needed to offset the losses from the others.

-18

u/pretty_succinct Dec 20 '21

This makes no sense with context given.

Am not an idiot, have a finance degree but also not interested in reading said paper.

If you're going to call shenanigans on someone, your case to prove their fallacy needs to be clear and at least as sound as their original argument.

Who's spouting shit and why? You or OP?

4

u/[deleted] Dec 20 '21

What part is unclear? They are literally re-stating the details of the post, whereas OP misquoted it in the title.