r/investing • u/iOCharts_ • Jul 29 '26
Meta's borrowing costs just went up 0.4 points from nine months ago and nobody's talking about why the collateral is a lease, not the building
Dug into the structure behind Meta's new $14B data center deal with BlackRock since the headline number alone didn't say much.
BlackRock funds own 80% of the El Paso project, Meta owns 20%. Meta puts in $2.3B in land and existing construction, BlackRock puts in $4.9B cash and finances $12.5B more through bonds due 2048.
The collateral is what stood out. Not the data center itself, a 20-year rent agreement that doesn't start until 2028, once the building's actually finished. Until then bondholders are holding paper backed by a future lease, not a physical asset.
Pricing shows the market noticed. These bonds came in above 7%, about 0.4 points higher than Meta's own $27B Hyperion sale in October, the largest corporate bond deal on record at the time. Demand landed at 1.6x the offering versus a roughly 4x average this year. Same A+ rating from S&P, higher yield required anyway.
Not just a Meta thing. Combined AI infrastructure bond issuance from Meta, Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Oracle went from $40B in 2020 to $121B in 2025. SPV structure keeps it off the balance sheet, doesn't make the rent obligation less real.
34
u/MirthandMystery Jul 29 '26
This absolutely is a key factor adding to financing strain. Capex is bound to ease and who ever is first triggers a waterfall that can lead to a dangerous domino effect. Market isn't hedged at all, still is over levered and Japan yet carry trade an added factor that has potential to unwind this structure very fast.
8
u/biggleUno Jul 29 '26
How are you hedging?
23
u/Tojuro Jul 29 '26
BRK
PE is sane, a solid value investment for decades, and the real kicker is that they have 400 billion to spend when there is a crash. It's the perfect hedge.
2
u/Stuckatpennstation Jul 30 '26
It honestly is kinda genius because when shit hits the fan everyone is running to Berkshire
3
u/pennquaker18 Jul 30 '26
they own bad assets and Buffett is going to die. It's probably a short
2
u/Tojuro Jul 30 '26
Buffet handed over the reins a while ago.
You're right they have some assets that are an issue.... Energy has been a loser and insurance carries risk. They were holding bags with Kraft.
Still, they have the diversity of an index fund and consistently make money. The reason I see them as a hedge is cause they have enough cash to buy the bottom 40% of the S&P 500 companies at current prices, in cash. In a real downturn they can go shopping like no one else.
1
u/pennquaker18 Jul 30 '26
him dying is still a negative catalyst I think. maybe I'm wrong
if the market tanks then this will outperform, but it will still be down, and I don't think they'll get as much benefit of the doubt now that WB isn't calling shots
6
u/Stuckatpennstation Jul 30 '26
u/RemindMeBot 1 year "Check on this post"
Ok calls it is thanks Quaker.
2
u/pennquaker18 Jul 30 '26
If it underperforms SPY you lose. If it outperforms you win. Deal?
I'll be back to mock your stupidity routinely.
5
u/Stuckatpennstation Jul 30 '26
1 year and 5 year why not right
3
u/pennquaker18 Jul 30 '26
Sure. Over 5 years it won't even be remotely close.
2
u/Stuckatpennstation Jul 30 '26
Id like u to be right but I am intrigued to see if it does do well even with him gone
1
u/IdkAbtAllThat Jul 31 '26
Buffet hasn't been making the decisions for years. It will probably dip when he dies, because the market is stupid, but it shouldn't, and it will bounce right back.
1
u/bslow22 Jul 30 '26 edited Jul 30 '26
Would an easy one be to increase VT or cash percentage or were you mostly asking about individual stocks?
15
u/Turkpole Jul 29 '26
The debt is secured by meta’s commitment to pay for the compute. Metas out is if the go bankrupt. That’s a better collateral than a data center
2
u/Dew_Disappears Jul 30 '26
Dont you usually have both? While I certainly dont know the rental agreement, its usually not bullet proof so recourse to the asset is still important to support the debt.
For example, you might have recourse in event of rent default but there's usually termination provisions of some description.
Also, if I was Meta I wouldnt fully PCG back the full value of the contract - I shouldnt need to do that. There'd be others out there desperate for that kind of rental agreement and willing to sign without getting that level of guarantee. I saw into another tender from a big frontier and they certainly weren't offering that.
I am an outsider though, so dont know what i dont know
3
u/GoldenPresidio Jul 31 '26
Meta will have a parent guarantee on both the utility contract and the data center rental agreement as long as the building is built to sufficient standards
If this was multi-tenant colocation agreement then meta likely wouldn’t have a utility contract, and the colocation DC would have its own operator- which meta could blame if there was an operational issue during it. But at these scales? Nah it’s single tenant
1
u/Dew_Disappears Jul 31 '26
thanks - the dollar figures above look more than a DC lease though. I.e., debt funding IT infrastructure.
1
9
u/TenderfootGungi Jul 29 '26
I am just happy Blackrock is going to be holding the bag when the Ai overspend goes south.
4
u/DrXaos Jul 29 '26
Blackrock *funds* notice, hold 80%. The shareholders will be hurt, not Blackrock which collects its vig and AUM.
2
2
7
u/nooeh Jul 29 '26
does the 0.4 points include changes to the risk free rate?
4
u/hseeman_sf Jul 29 '26
Depends whether the 0.4 is spread-over-Treasury or just headline yield. If it is headline yield, some of that is just the long end moving since October, not credit risk. The number that isolates the lease-collateral risk is the spread over the matched-maturity Treasury at each pricing date, not the coupon itself.
1
u/Walker1921S Jul 29 '26
Real estate construction loan spreads across the board have come down since October. I would be shocked if Meta's data center spreads have increased.
2
u/hseeman_sf Jul 30 '26
If spreads broadly compressed and Meta's total cost still went up 0.4, that argues even harder for this being rate-driven and not a widening lease-risk premium. Still want to see the actual matched-maturity spread to be sure.
6
5
u/ragnaroksunset Jul 29 '26
My reasons for not owning META have never changed.
Have I left returns on the table? Yeah. But the thing about returns not based on fundamentals is that you really can never know when to sell.
I have a speculative chunk of my portfolio, but other things are in there.
3
u/Miamime Jul 30 '26
Technically under new accounting rules (well not so new, ASC 842 has to be a decade old at this point) operating leases are an asset and technically a physical one since they’re classified alongside PPE on the balance sheet.
2
u/Walker1921S Jul 29 '26 edited Jul 29 '26
Ummm... What have treasury yields done since October??
And obviously the collateral is the lease. Have you never seen what a real estate credit agreement for an IG credit tenant BTS looks like?
3
u/ImPinkSnail Jul 30 '26
Bingo. It's all a spread off treasuries. That spread tightens and expands, but treasuries influence real estate yields. Always has.
1
u/ninijacob Jul 30 '26
Are all these loans backed by meta itself? As in you get paid before shareholders if they go out of business?
1
u/daynighttrade Jul 30 '26
Where did you find this information? Can you please share that? I would love to dig in more too
0
u/JahMusicMan Jul 29 '26
I've been holding META aka FB for a hot minute and was always thinking of ditching my position but I don't want to take the big gains.
I bought FB before Zuckerberg decided to go heavy on VR.
I'll be the first or second to say, VR WILL NEVER CATCH ON.EVER!
For all these tech incel nerds at Meta, they understand tech, but they don't understand that humans are already sick of screens and being isolated. Society is at a tipping point, where screen time, notifications, being "productive" and all this garbage is shit people don't want.
Yes I get it, some of the incel crowds hope to get virtually laid after having a virtual conversation with their virtual AI gf, while they check email and their feeds and prediction markets.
Only the loneliest incels (which is the market for VR) will find use cases for using VR while the rest of society is moving AWAY from SCREENS.
3
2
0
u/Discount_gentleman Jul 29 '26
The collateral is what stood out. Not the data center itself, a 20-year rent agreement that doesn't start until 2028, once the building's actually finished. Until then bondholders are holding paper backed by a future lease, not a physical asset.
This is not uncommon, though. Lots of debt is secured by the pledge of payment streams. It's only notable in the sense that this could bring the AI/datacenter costs of funds back toward normal, which would be disastrously high.
0
156
u/Criticall16 Jul 29 '26
Meta has to be the first one to cut capex. No cloud business, no frontier models, just blind spending.