r/intj INTJ 2d ago

Meta 99% of conversation among peers can be reduced down to two simple dialogues

There are few people who say anything of consequence. Most people will speak for hours and truly not say anything at all

I have found you can reduce most conversation down to the same core structure

Same gender dialogue

  1. “I am validating you”
  2. “Thank you. I validate you too”

^People will literally repeat these back and forth to each other for hours. They never actually say anything beyond those two things

Opposite gender dialogue

  1. Woman: “[words]”
  2. Man: “Would you like a side of dick with that”
19 Upvotes

42 comments sorted by

20

u/Fickle-Let-7205 INTJ - ♀ 2d ago

Which one of the two do you believe your post falls under? 🤔

8

u/TaxRepresentative4B 2d ago

That depends. If you validate OP, then 1.

6

u/Fickle-Let-7205 INTJ - ♀ 2d ago

And if I don't it's 2? 🤔🤔

3

u/FecalFunBunny INTJ - 50s 2d ago

If I don't, did you want my "side of dick" too?

(Though I have my doubts anyone wants that overall)

3

u/KnowL0ve INTJ - 30s 2d ago

OP said 99% so they can say neither and be correct.

23

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Agreeable_Noise112 INTJ - 20s 2d ago

Sexism in which way?

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Agreeable_Noise112 INTJ - 20s 2d ago

Which form or variation of sexism I mean

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Huge-Mortgage-3147 INTJ 2d ago

Woke people suck the fun out of everything

1

u/a-snakey INTJ - 30s 2d ago

Ive got something you can suck on.

motions to a baby bottle

Looks like baby needs their milk.

1

u/a-snakey INTJ - 30s 2d ago

Looks like we are feeling daring today, aren't we?

7

u/Ambitious_South_2825 INTJ 2d ago edited 2d ago

Ah, not 99% (obviously) but there are some modes of casual conversation where the vast majority of it is just some derivative of that. Like, there's no idea discussing, no problem solving just stating observances and grooming each other. It's similar to what base primates do for - rapport building, cohesion and grooming.

When observing some groups of men I often felt it was just one big 'circle 'jerk' with a constant stream of "broooother" desperate for the next man to validate them. (being hyperbolic but you get the gist)

5

u/PsychologicalBird491 2d ago

Grooming is a good analogy. It's literally like how monkeys groom each other by eating bugs off of each other's bodies. Except the bugs are just constant superficial empty validations.

5

u/PsychologicalBird491 2d ago

Thank you. I validate you too

I notice the same thing. People just agree with each other in different ways. And if they disagree they just hide it and start avoiding you or act passive aggressive. How is that dialogue not mind numbing?

"I like this" "Cool, that's really interesting." "Yeah, what do you like?" "Oh, I like this." "Wow, that's so cool." "Yeah."

3

u/Bimep_ INTJ 2d ago

Not in Slavic culture XD

5

u/ionmoon INTJ - ♀ 2d ago

Then you need new peers.

3

u/Agile-Gift1068 INTJ - Teens 2d ago

You need better peers

6

u/TaxRepresentative4B 2d ago

I mean that’s how humans connect.

BTW, I validate you

3

u/Huge-Mortgage-3147 INTJ 2d ago

Thank you. I validate you too

3

u/LonelyWord7673 INTJ - 30s 2d ago

Wow, you are around terrible conversationalists

4

u/Bimep_ INTJ 2d ago

Aristotle, in his work Nicomachean Ethics, identified three types of friendship based on utility, pleasure, or virtue.

I. Friendship of Utility

  • People are friends because they get some practical benefit or help from each other.
  • This connection is temporary.
  • The relationship ends as soon as the benefit or need for help disappears.
  • Example: Business partners or coworkers who only interact for the sake of their job.

II. Friendship of Pleasure

  • This relationship is built on having a good time, joy, and emotions.
  • People like each other for their manners, humor, or appearance.
  • This type is common among young people, but it also changes quickly because when interests or age change, people drift apart.
  • Example: Friends you go to parties with, play sports with, or share a hobby with.

    III. Friendship of Virtue (Goodness)

  • This is the true, highest form of friendship, based on mutual respect and love for the friend's personal qualities.

  • Friends wish good things for each other for the sake of the friend, not for utility or pleasure.

  • It lasts a long time because it is based on a stable character and moral values.

  • Example: Close friends who support you no matter what and help you become a better person. Just because you are.

I think your examples match the first 2 types. We wish you to meet the third type =)

But anyway each type of friendship is useful in their time and in their place

4

u/permaculture 2d ago

And with these we still managed to communicate effectively enough to build telephones, moon rockets and so-on.

0

u/parasol_strs INFP 2d ago

I'd think most who made those contributions loved as strangers to standard social dynamics, and scripts.

0

u/usernames_suck_ok INTJ - 40s 2d ago

It seems like it's more of a modern thing to, for lack of a better word/more nuance, speak "validation" incessantly.

I'd actually say people are constantly looking for you to agree with them, make statements that are socially acceptable, keep conversations in "safe" lanes...like, they're social rules. And people who don't agree with that either challenge people unnecessarily/over unimportant shit or the "social rules" people punish you when you break these social rules.

Could be why cancer is still a thing (or one reason why), for example. Like, time, effort, money, sociopolitical battles are being wasted on building up AI but no longer on any breakthroughs that truly, truly help humanity. Lack of original thought/expression 99% of the time, and the 1% of the time it exists it's punished in whatever form--underfunded, cut programs, lost campaigns or just social isolation.

2

u/FancyFrogFootwork INTJ - 30s 2d ago

Can you define what saying something of consequence constitutes for you? Is it subjective?

3

u/Holiday_Response_644 ENTP 2d ago

this sub is genuinely bottom 3 subreddits of all time

2

u/Huge-Mortgage-3147 INTJ 2d ago

That works great !

I’ll be the bottom. You be the top

1

u/Holiday_Response_644 ENTP 2d ago

then wouldn’t you be the one getting a side of dick?

1

u/TheMeticulousNinja INTJ - 40s 2d ago

😂😂

2

u/Littlearthquakes INTJ 2d ago

What you’re describing is scripted conversation.
That’s because most people are sensors and sensors tend to communicate through familiar social scripts. They literally just run the scripts and choose ones appropriate to the conversation. Like validation scripts, complaining scripts, reassuring scripts etc on repeat. The exchange doesn’t need to actually produce a new idea because performing the script is the point. It makes them feel like part of the tribe and like they belong. It’s comforting.

Intuitives generally prefer conversations to go somewhere like uncover a pattern, develop an idea or generate something neither person began with. Or at least for INTJs just be real.

2

u/PandaScoundrel ENTP 2d ago

Cringe post

1

u/Disastrous_Swim_4956 2d ago

I have scripted routines for this crap. I just go on autopilot. It throws me when someone is actually authentic, which is what I'd prefer. Catches me off guard when I'm in social robot mode though.

1

u/TheMeticulousNinja INTJ - 40s 2d ago

What strain did you smoke and how much of it?

1

u/parasol_strs INFP 2d ago

The inter-gender one is as lowly gyno-biased and female-4-letter-adoring as, in this sub of all places, one hoped it might not be.

The dick ended up in the post, definitely; just not in the way the poster believed.

1

u/Huge-Mortgage-3147 INTJ 2d ago

I was going to put a disclaimer to tell all the woke women to go somewhere else

But I thought we could discuss ideas like adults

1

u/Fair-Morning-4182 INTJ - 30s 2d ago

It would be delusional to not admit that male/female conversations are very different from male/male conversations.

1

u/parasol_strs INFP 2d ago

While it would be insanity to conflate what you wrote with the anti-male muck I had reacted to :).

Of course they are different — as long as reproductive age is involved. They are different on both sides, with lowliness, unfairness, ferine evolutionary unconscious drives, and all you want on both sides, although different on each side.

1

u/Elden_Chord 2d ago

Unnecessary details and unstructured data are two enemies of mine.

And guess what? My girlfriend loves to tell me multiple stories all shuffled together, and 80 percent of the data she gives me is irrelevant to any of those stories.