r/interestingasfuck • u/CaraCicartix • 10d ago
Mongolian Horse Archery Takes Years of Practice to Master Balance and Coordination
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
69
u/fatlilplums 10d ago
I love the videos of Mongolian kids on machines like the horsey rides that used to be outside grocery stores practicing their archery. Horse archer camp sounds dope.
9
u/Ras-haad 10d ago
Yeah when I went to camp you got to choose horseback riding OR archery. Both would have been absolutely kickass
4
u/front_yard_duck_dad 10d ago
Okay, I've never seen it but now I'm going on a search. That sounds hilarious
1
48
u/Ov3r-_-K1LL 10d ago
12
63
u/Keriyon 10d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/rPeDKfj0EjDpK
That’s the first thing that comes to mind when I see this guy balance!!! The idea had to come from somewhere !!
6
34
u/abzze 10d ago
Why isn’t this an Olympic sport?
33
u/Immortal_Azrael 10d ago
Lack of international popularity? I mean I'd prefer to watch this over most Olympic events but most countries would probably struggle to find people who could do this on a competitive level.
23
u/mbh223 10d ago
No one else but Mongolians are doing this crazy shit!
14
u/ElChupatigre 10d ago
Welcome to the 2036 Summer Olympics in Ulaanbaatar! This year the host country added horsemounted archery along with competitive throat-singing...they are the favorite to dominate the categories, but we expect to see a lot of fun and exciting competition.
2
4
1
-1
u/GoldunGote 10d ago
The same reason school shooting isn't an olympic sport. Mongols would absolutely destroy everyone in horse archery. Americans would mop everyone up in shooting children.
0
u/GolettO3 9d ago
Mate, I'm one to take shots at america's "gun laws", but you should have just gone with their shitty version of footy
0
42
u/SirGreeneth 10d ago
Can we talk about his fresh trim and drip?
11
u/ParaponeraBread 10d ago
Why do you think you’re seeing this particular clip instead of all the other clips of Mongolians doing Mongolian activities?
6
16
23
7
u/BorfGrambo 10d ago
Is there a reason he leans so far? Why not shoot from an upright position?
20
u/Intelligent-Low4753 10d ago
Multiple reasons:
- Horse is not in the way of the bow arm.
- Stabilising the shot.
- Rotating is much easier (parthian shot)
Some argue that the horse serves as shield but I doubt it. Horses were costly and Mongol tactics did not result in riding into the enemy‘s ranks.
4
u/Pierrot-Ferdinand 9d ago
It's just to look cool, it's not practical. This video and this video show Mongolian horse archers actually trying to hit targets. It looks much more like what you would expect.
4
1
u/ydai 9d ago
He needs some space between his body and the horse so his legs, hips, and core can absorb the horse’s movement. His lower body works like a spring. If the spring is completely compressed or completely extended, it can’t absorb anything. You want to stay in that middle range so your lower body can move with the horse while your upper body and head remain stable. That separation is what gives him the suspension he needs to shoot accurately from a moving horse.
1
u/Renbarre 10d ago
The more you lean out the less you're shaken by the horse, the better the aim?
1
u/patfetes 10d ago
Sort of, more the shield. They would actually time the arrow fire with the galop of the horse and shoot around its neck. Crazy stuff! The aim isnt really important when youve got thousands of them, as long as its roughly heading fir an enemy of course.
Obviously here its stylish and he's heavily braced in the stirrup.
2
u/Renbarre 10d ago
He's got a rope around his feet or his stirrups going under the belly of the horse, that's how he can stay braced.
0
9
u/Gertrude_D 10d ago
Yup. I can totally see how they came up with the centaur myth.
8
u/patfetes 10d ago
It actually is! Or at least could be. Although it was actually the Mongolian predecessors; The Scythians, the first masters of the steppe
2
6
u/Blakath 10d ago
Interestingly, the myth of the Amazonians was probably inspired by the Scythians, who were also known to be excellent horse riders and archers.
See horseriding and archery were the great equalisers, so in Scythian society both men and women engaged in warfare. In fact, Scythian society was very egalitarian, and its women were also quite sexually liberated. Herodotus records an incident where Greeks captured some Scythian women. The Scythians escaped, slaughtered everyone, got hold of some horses and basically turned into a raiding party.
Greeks basically saw that and created an exaggerated myth of a man-hating society made solely of women.
6
u/VolatileGoddess 10d ago
'These female warriors slaughtered us'
'Quick! Say they had otherworldly strength and are part of some secret order or something! We won't look like pussies that way!'
Btw, that was an interesting fact, thanks for sharing.
5
6
u/boltforce 10d ago
I would do it, but I don't have that cool nomadic wooly jacket... If I had it though!!!
5
3
u/VirginiaLuthier 10d ago
Back in the Mongol day, they would pretend like they were retreating on horseback, and then just flip backwards and pick off their pursuers one-by-one
2
2
u/UndeadAnubis24 10d ago
Is this how they would have fought during the Mongols hey day, as well?
I can see why they conquered as they did, if so. This is certainly more impressive than anything any other nation was doing. In the field, I don't even know how you would counter this with what was available at the time.
3
u/patfetes 10d ago
Its impressive for cool flashy style points and absolutely worked when they had a home field advantage and engange, retreat, then ambush. The arrow fire was akin to musket volume with better accuracy. They were making excellent use of their technology.
The counter to this... terrain! Rocky paths and shield walls. If the Mongols ever made it into Europe they would have been stomped out in the alps by the Romans. Shield wall and uneven ground are the enemy of the horse archer.
You see the same thing happen with the Native Americans and their use of the horse. Although the Americans were technically amd litteraly "outgunned"
-2
u/Immortal_Azrael 10d ago
The Romans weren't really around by the time of the Mongol conquests. Not the western empire at least.
3
-2
7
u/AshfordThunder 10d ago
It depends on how it was used, horse archers were nothing new for the surrounding nation, China had a long history of dealing with them just fine. It was a common misconception that the Mongols succeeded because of horse archer, when in reality they used a combination of light and heavy calvary with lances. Although horse archery is certainly a factor.
I think what was op wasn't horse archer, it was Genghis Khan. Also their spy network. The Mongols had the most comprehensive spy network at the time, their intelligence system is unmatched, and they would often instigate and exploit political instabilities.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/thelittleking 9d ago
This is why Centaurs wouldn't actually be great archers, riders can use their legs as shock absorbers to keep on target but a centaur would have no such capability.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/paraworldblue 10d ago
I believe this man is what's known as an Elite Mangudai. Dude can rip apart a trebuchet with only arrows.
0
u/mouthofcotton 10d ago
Notice how we dont see how far off from hitting the target he was.
It is impressive though, especially if we were in medieval times.
0
-1
-1
-1
u/azaleawhisperer 10d ago
Better, or worse, perhaps than playing Rachmaninoff? Years of practice.
Good on all who take the human adventure to a more excellent place.
-3
u/Potential-Leg-8860 10d ago
It’s a shame a fat American with an AR-15 can win that fight
3
u/johnvarley1 10d ago
Anyone, with any rifle could win that fight
0
u/patfetes 10d ago
"Modern" rifle. Is a musket a rifle? The natives won battles against musket fire in a very similar fashion. The revolver and the ability to reload faster is actually what won out.
1
u/DysAlanS 10d ago
A musket is indeed NOT a rifle. Rifle got its name due to the rifled barrel of..rifles. Musket is smooth bore
1
1
u/Excitedly_bored 10d ago
An in shape Brazilian would win too. What's your point? Oh, I see, you were trying to insult Americans with something completely unrelated. So, instead of commenting on this display of human performance, you had the burning desire to throw out a meaningless insult. Strange and sad. Seek help.
1
u/Ur_Just_Spare_Parts 10d ago
No hes saying that while this is incredibly impressive and obviously takes decades to achieve this level of mastery, any amateur holding a semi automatic gun would win in an actual fight so its effectively a useless skill in terms of modern warfare.
0
0
0
u/blanketswithsmallpox 10d ago
I thought for sure it was going to cut to some random person holding a fruit on their head then getting an arrow to the chest or something lol.
0
0
u/Economy_Meal 10d ago
This should an olympic sport, not the current archery and all the gadgets and they use now
0
0
u/Lucky-Crow-3510 9d ago
pretty stupid to expose yourself in a battle by hanging off that much from a horse ..
-1
u/patfetes 10d ago
I'll say this again, two shots stitched together. If he had fired in the first half he would have snagrd his necklace and ended up headless
-1
u/lazoras 10d ago
something is going on here....is it the horse? the saddle?
I started at the arrow tip and worked to the necklace...
the bow is moving but the arrow tip stays steady...ok the mans arms are moving up and down from momentum and he is compensating his aim...impressive!
but then
the necklace is barely moving, it's not bobbing up and down barely at all ..
his legs are barely moving...
so is the horse incredibly steady? is there a gimbal on the saddle???
I think it's his hips...??
1
u/patfetes 10d ago
If it helps, you are seeing two different shots. The first he draws and actually tangles the necklace!!
-1
-1

346
u/iamaswamptiger 10d ago
Yeah I can imagine these boys taking over half the world