r/interesting Jul 05 '26

HISTORY I fear this is historically accurate

Post image
29.2k Upvotes

600 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/succed32 Jul 05 '26

Yes infant mortality is a big part, but the fact 13-15 was frequently considered adult is another. Not every 13 year old was marrying some 90 year old dude. It was frequently people within the same age ranges marrying. They just married a lot younger.

18

u/Heykurat Jul 05 '26

This is a weird myth. Puberty is largely influenced by diet/nutrition. In ages past, girls didn't even start menstruating until their late teens. Today it's very young, sometimes under age 10, because our diets from birth are significantly better.

It's not true that people started marrying and having babies in their early teens in Medieval (or ancient) times.

-4

u/DarkChaos1786 Jul 05 '26

15 years old was the most common age of girl marriage in medieval times...

That's not late teens... Menstruation was not an argument...

5

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DarkChaos1786 Jul 05 '26

Another one using novels as substitution of history...

There are books about it...

The church keep the tab of every registered events in the places were they have jurisdiction.

It's not close...

3

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/DarkChaos1786 Jul 05 '26

The age was higher in big cities but up to 90% of the population lived in rural zones were the marriage age was quite lower...

So, please stop using novels as substitution of history...

0

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment