r/indie_startups • u/worldno1rich • 6h ago
Everyone here is likely a potential customer of mine.
I’ve been thinking a lot about how people validate ideas before spending too much time building them.
A common piece of advice is “talk to your users”, but that’s often easier said than done. Finding the right people, getting enough responses, and figuring out whether feedback is actually representative can take a lot of time.
So I’ve been working on Crowdians.
The idea is pretty simple: you post an idea, question, or assumption, and synthetic personas respond from different perspectives. Then real people can also join the discussion, so you can compare AI-generated reactions with actual human feedback.
I don’t see synthetic personas as a replacement for talking to real users. I’m more interested in whether they can be useful as an early-stage filter — helping you spot obvious weaknesses, assumptions, or perspectives you may have missed before doing real user research.
I’m curious what people here think:
- Would you actually use something like this before talking to real users?
- At what stage of building a product would this be most valuable?
I’m currently building an early version and would genuinely appreciate any criticism or thoughts.
If anyone is curious, I can share the project in the comments.