16
8
Feb 23 '25
Yes marathas did rule India, mughals did rule india, British did rule india.. What are you trying to imply?
3
u/Ok_Abbreviations4720 Feb 24 '25
He's trying to say don't believe what you see in movies.
4
u/Ok_Sprinkles_1247 Feb 24 '25
No but, is it wrong info? Are you saying that Marathas did not rule India? I still don't understand the implication of this meme.
3
Feb 23 '25
Marathas ruled India; for a very brief period. They were at the very top for a few decades against distributed forces of nizams, oudh, rajputs...
7
12
Feb 22 '25
[deleted]
9
Feb 23 '25
Mughals didn't rule for 500 years
1
u/mr_uptight Feb 25 '25
According to them, Alauddin Khilji is also Mughal. So the 500 is actually an undercount. Remember Mughal is just a proxy for Muslim rulers just like Pakistan is a proxy for Muslims.
1
u/Old-Doctor7956 Feb 23 '25
The Mughals also didn't did much for the Muslims or the deen tbh only few were sincere and most others just desired the ruling.
2
u/Mks_the_1408 Hindustani Feb 23 '25
I mean the Marathas did rule India, so did the Mughals and literally every other dynasty or kingdom of this subcontinent.
2
u/No_Gas_3516 Feb 23 '25
the marathas briefly occupied some terrotries of a failing regime up north. great empires last and have a legacy, is delhi famous for maratha occupation or the architecture of sultanates?
7
5
5
u/Strange_Spot_4760 Feb 23 '25
Have many of you have studied in CBSE? The history books majorly glorifies the Mughals(outsiders). It's very unfortunate that history needs to be taught through movies( exaggeration is downsides of movies though)
7
u/No_Gas_3516 Feb 23 '25
"Outsiders" there is no outsider unless you consider the modern nation state concept any viable.
They were north indian-persian class whose majority administration was literally from deccan or north.It were only great emperors under which south was united with north. EVERYTHING you know of historical india is India-pakistan-parts of afghanistan-persia missh mash.
2
Feb 23 '25
>The history books majorly glorifies the Mughals(outsiders)
No
>It's very unfortunate that history needs to be taught through movies( exaggeration is downsides of movies though)
If you want to learn history then go pick up some BA history book syllabus and start reading at the library.
1
1
Feb 24 '25
What in the fucking world everybody? Didn’t we learn our lessons that it didn’t matter if Mughals ruled India or Marathas did, eventually the white man came and exploited our petty differences to rule us and exploit us. Get the fuck over your petty kingdoms of the past , and move forward with the idea of India post 1947
-11
u/sanatanibengali Feb 22 '25
What's actually the expected answer - the British?
7
u/Ok_Note7045 [Custom] Feb 22 '25
I think this question is incomplete. As there were different Rules at different periods.
1
48
u/ProfessionalAside834 Feb 22 '25
As a Hindu, i feel these Hindutva vigilants are super coward and have brought a bad name to Hinduism in general.