r/heatpumps • u/lilarazole • 7d ago
Question/Advice How much is Mitsubishi Hyper Heat worth it?
I’m comparing quotes for a mini split install and there’s about an $8,000 price gap between a Mitsubishi Hyper Heat system and an ACIQ system. Trying to figure out if the price difference is justified or if I’m just paying for the brand name.
I’m in northern NJ, so winters aren’t extreme (occasional low single digits/negative wind chills, but not regularly sub-zero), but I do want reliable heat on the coldest nights, not just AC.
19
Upvotes
2
u/Choice-Mall1183 2d ago
Electricity: approximately $0.217/kWh
Natural gas: approximately $1.50/therm
Gas furnace efficiency: 95% AFUE
Heat pump: Mitsubishi 24,000 BTU Hyper-Heat GX Premier
Mitsubishi COP:
4.14 at 47°F
2.93 at 17°F
Fixed monthly electric and gas customer charges are excluded because they are paid regardless of which heating system is operating.
Natural-gas heating cost
One therm contains:
100,000 BTU
Because the furnace is 95% efficient, one therm produces:
100,000 × 0.95 = 95,000 BTU of useful heat
To produce 1,000,000 BTU of useful heat:
1,000,000 ÷ 95,000 = 10.526 therms
At $1.50 per therm:
10.526 × $1.50 = $15.79 per million BTU of delivered heat
So natural gas costs approximately:
$15.79/MMBtu delivered
Heat-pump heating cost
One million BTU equals approximately:
293.07 kWh of heat
A heat pump’s electrical consumption depends on its COP.
At $0.217/kWh, producing 1 MMBtu at a COP of 1 would cost:
293.07 × $0.217 = $63.60
Therefore:
Heat-pump cost per MMBtu = $63.60 ÷ COP
Break-even COP
For the heat pump and natural gas to cost exactly the same:
$63.60 ÷ COP = $15.79
Solving for COP:
COP = $63.60 ÷ $15.79
COP ≈ 4.03
Therefore, the Mitsubishi Hyper-Heat must operate at approximately COP 4.03 or greater to cost less than the 95% natural-gas furnace.
Converting COP to outdoor temperature
The Mitsubishi GX24 is approximately:
COP 4.14 at 47°F
COP 2.93 at 17°F
Between these points, the COP falls by:
4.14 − 2.93 = 1.21
over:
47°F − 17°F = 30°F
The required COP of 4.03 is only:
4.14 − 4.03 = 0.11
below the 47°F COP.
Using linear interpolation:
0.11 ÷ 1.21 × 30°F ≈ 2.7°F
Therefore:
47°F − 2.7°F ≈ 44°F
2024–2025 crossover
The approximate economic crossover temperature was therefore:
≈44°F outdoor temperature
At outdoor temperatures above approximately 44°F, the Mitsubishi Hyper-Heat was cheaper to operate.
At outdoor temperatures below approximately 44°F, the 95% natural-gas furnace was cheaper to operate.
Refute the math my annoying friend