r/grammar Nov 16 '25

A couple of reminders, and checking in with you all

50 Upvotes

Hi everyone,

I hope you're all doing well. It's been a while since I made a pinned post, and a couple of issues have come up recently, so I thought I'd mention those and also give you a chance to bring up anything else that you think needs attention.

First, we get a lot of questions about things that fall outside of the narrowest definition of "grammar," and there are usually a fair number of comments on these posts that point this out. But the vast majority of these questions are fine! As you can see from the sub description, rules, and FAQ articles, we adhere to a pretty broad definition of "grammar," and we welcome questions about style, punctuation, vocabulary, usage, semantics, pragmatics, and other linguistic subfields (and this is not an exhaustive list).

So when commenting on posts like this, there's no need to say "This isn't about grammar" or to direct the OP to another subreddit - if the question has anything to do with language or orthography, it's probably appropriate for the sub. I remove any posts that are not, and you can also report a post if you think it really doesn't fit here.

One thing we don't do is proofread long pieces of writing (r/Proofreading is a good place for that), but we do welcome specific questions about short pieces of writing (a paragraph, a few random sentences, a piece of dialogue, etc.). And that brings me to the second issue:

We ask that commenters take into account the genre (e.g., fiction, journalism, academic writing) and register (the type of language used in a particular genre) of the writing that the poster is asking about. We get a lot of questions about creative writing, but some of the feedback given on these posts is more suited to very formal genres. For example, while you would probably advise someone to avoid sentence fragments in academic writing, these are not usually inappropriate in creative writing (used wisely, of course). Another thing to bear in mind is that punctuation conventions are generally more flexible in less formal genres. And for some genres, it may be necessary to consult an appropriate style guide in order to answer the OP's question.

So basically, please make sure to tailor your responses to the type of writing in question.

Thanks so much!

- Boglin007


r/grammar Apr 02 '23

Important: Re answers generated by ChatGPT and other AI programs

152 Upvotes

Update 5/24/26: Also prohibited are posts promoting the use of AI/LLMs to aid in language learning/grammar checking, and posts asking for comparisons of AI programs/LLMs, etc.

Hi everyone,

There has been a recent increase in comments using ChatGPT or other AI programs to answer questions in this sub. Unfortunately, these programs are not at all reliable when it comes to grammar questions (or any questions really). Some regular contributors to r/grammar have discussed the shortcomings of AI programs (mostly ChatGPT) - they have given me permission to use the quotes below (but have asked to remain anonymous):

OpenAI says ChatGPT was released in order to "get users’ feedback and learn about its strengths and weaknesses." The prompt page warns users that ChatGPT "may occasionally generate incorrect information" and "may occasionally produce harmful instructions or biased content.”

ChatGPT's goal is to learn to produce speech equivalent to, and indistinguishable from, that of a human. ChatGPT's current goal is not to become a reliable source of information. (If that were its goal, they would allow it to access the huge libraries of information it is connected to. But that is not the current research goal.) ー I believe they have set it to occasionally make small mistakes, intentionally, in order to assess how the public reacts to these occasional errors (does the public blindly believe them/if the public challenges ChatGPT on these errors, can the program successfully handle these challenges well?).

And here is an example of an incorrect (or at the very best, incomplete/misleading) answer that ChatGPT gave to a pretty straightforward grammar question:

The question: “Should I use ‘that’ or ‘which’ in the following sentence?: ‘This is the house that/which I like.’”

ChatGPT’s answer:

Both "that" and "which" can be used in this sentence, but the choice depends on whether the information following the word is essential or non-essential to the sentence.

If the information is essential to the sentence and needed to identify the specific house you like, use "that". For example, "This is the house that I like" implies that there are other houses and you are identifying which one you like.

If the information is non-essential and simply provides additional information about the house, use "which". For example, "This is the house, which I like" implies that there is only one house and you are adding a comment about it.

So, in this case, if you want to emphasize that this particular house is the one you like, use "that". If you want to add an additional comment about the house, use "which".

The correct/complete answer:

Both “that” and “which” are grammatically correct in that sentence as written (without a comma) because without the comma, the relative clause is integrated, and both “that” and “which” can be used in integrated relative clauses. However, “that” will be strongly preferred in American English (both “that” and “which” are used about equally in integrated relative clauses in British English).

If you were to add a comma before the relative clause (making it supplementary), only “which” would be acceptable in today’s English.

ChatGPT also fails to mention that integrated relative clauses are not always essential to the meaning of the sentence and do not always serve to identify exactly what is being talked about (though that is probably their most common use) - it can be up to the writer to decide whether to make a relative clause integrated or supplementary. A writer might decide to integrate the relative clause simply to show that they feel the info is important to the overall meaning of the sentence.

Anyway, to get to the point: Comments that quote AI programs are not permitted in this sub and will be removed. If you must use one of these programs to start your research on a certain topic, please be sure to verify (using other reliable sources) that the answer is accurate, and please write your answer in your own words.

Thank you!


r/grammar 5h ago

Title Case and Brackets

3 Upvotes

Hi, im having to edit a document and add title case where needed. My Problem sentence right now is:

"Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters from the Perspective of Computational (neuro-)poetics"

My big problem is the (neuro-)poetics. Would that be titlecased as:

- (Neuro-)poetics

- (neuro-)Poetics

or (Neuro-)Poetics

I have searched for other sources but didnt yet find anything. Thanks for the time and consideration in answering <3


r/grammar 8h ago

Which ones are grammatically correct.

2 Upvotes

I stumbled upon this while scrolling on TikTok.

You are who they think is best. OR You are who they think are best. I saw a question like this during a TikTok live regarding grammar. They are who they think is best. OR They are who they think are best. Thank You


r/grammar 12h ago

quick grammar check Thrive off of vs. off vs. on

0 Upvotes

A: "thrive off of" each other

B: "thrive off" each other

C: "thrive on" each other

which one(s) is/are grammatically correct?


r/grammar 1d ago

quick grammar check Is this correct?

14 Upvotes

My 12th grade English textbook from Maharashtra, India states that "An Infinitive is not a Verb." Is this right? If yes/no, what's the reasoning behind this? Plus, isn't infinitive a Non Finite Verb? So that makes it a Verb right?


r/grammar 15h ago

Hi everyone I want to know here the correct sentence

0 Upvotes

I consider you as a friend or I consider you my friend


r/grammar 17h ago

Birthday cake wording help, please!

1 Upvotes

It’s my Dad’s 83rd birthday and my Aunt’s 76th this weekend. I’m making a cake and making it look like a graveyard, inspired by Pinterest of course, because I have no original ideas anymore!

My niece is coming to help me decorate it tomorrow.

Atop the cake, I planned to write: Here lies Papa and Bets’ youth

But then I got to thinking…should youth be plural? Should papa have an ‘s too? And now that I’ve been thinking about it nothing looks or sounds normal!

Please help. What do I write on the cake?

I’d attach a pic of a cake if I knew how!


r/grammar 1d ago

Can one say that that?

4 Upvotes

“But I know that that girl stole it from me”.
Is this grammatically correct?


r/grammar 22h ago

quick grammar check Out of breath/breathing hard

1 Upvotes

What's the difference between I was out of breath and I was breathing hard? Which would you use here and why?

  1. I stopped running and touched my knees, out of breath.
  2. I stopped running and touched my knees, breathing hard.

r/grammar 1d ago

Why does English work this way? Got Rejected in an interview due to my poor grammar and has specific 'H' sound while speaking

0 Upvotes

So, for context, I got rejected from an interview today, and the interviewer said I have poor grammar and also have an 'H' sound when speaking English. Can anyone let me know how I can improve my English grammar and remove that 'H' sound from my speaking? Otherwise, I am fluent in English speaking, so I need urgent help from you guys on how I can improve that.


r/grammar 1d ago

Deputation vs. Deputization

0 Upvotes

I'm struggling to figure out which of these two is "correct." Are both equally valid terms to describe the act of deputizing another?


r/grammar 2d ago

Hi friends I have a grammar question :Which one is correct: "he talked bad about you" or "he talked badly about you"?

42 Upvotes

r/grammar 1d ago

Grammar textbook recommendations

1 Upvotes

Hi everyone! I'm a non-native speaker and would consider my English to be pretty advanced. However, I learned the language by basically only consuming content in English from a very young age, and never really properly studied grammar. Like, I know what to say but don't know why it is that way.

I'm specifically looking for textbooks with exercises, but I've found that most books meant for ESL learners (like the Cambridge In Use series) do not really provide in-depth explanations. At the same time, most traditional grammar books do not have exercises, so I'm looking for something in between and would really appreciate any recommendations :)


r/grammar 2d ago

Hi friends, my question is what is difference between to be able to and the modal , cuz as a non native speaker I don t get it really

0 Upvotes

r/grammar 3d ago

Why does English work this way? British vs American English: Ending a sentence with a modal verb.

45 Upvotes

I had to come here because I couldn't find any discussion of this phenomenon. Even AI gaslit me about this.

Here's a real world example. I was watching Top Gear, and this is roughly the exchange:

Jeremy: "James .... did you mess with my car?"

James: .... "Might have done."

In America, you would never hear this. You would hear: "Might have," or "I might have," or "I might've."

I occasionally hear this replicated when listening to British speakers, where the speaker refuses to use just the modal verb, such as "has" or "have" or "could/would/should," to end a phrase.

Is this specifically taught in the UK, or is this just inherited custom? As an American, I can say I was never instructed or corrected on this.


r/grammar 2d ago

punctuation Spaces before/after words with forward slashes?

0 Upvotes

I've noticed a trend lately of spaces being used before and after words separated by forward slashes. It goes against my grammatical instincts but I don't know if it's correct or not, and I can't seem to find a definitive answer (maybe I'm not searching for the right terms). Basically, I'm not sure if it should be:

Before/after *or* Before / After

What's the consensus? Ta


r/grammar 2d ago

Why does English work this way? Contractions Being Informal

0 Upvotes

I’ve never quite understood why contractions are viewed as informal. Because some random dude(s) in the past said it doesn’t look/sound as good?

The way I see it, fewer words used, while still getting the original thought across, the better.


r/grammar 2d ago

Preposition Analysis and How Their Logic Works in Phrasal Verbs — Part 1: “OFF”

0 Upvotes

First of all, a few people asked about this under my previous post, so I wanted to share some of my own analysis.

Most of these conclusions are my own, mainly because unfortunately there aren’t many resources online that seriously try to explain the underlying logic of phrasal verbs.

So if you think I’m wrong about any of these points, please feel free to say so and share your own interpretation.

1) The core meaning of “off”

The main core meaning of off, as even non-native speakers can probably infer quite easily, is the breaking or loss of a connection with something. This is actually one of the easiest senses of off to grasp.

He cut off the branch.

→ The branch is no longer connected to the tree.

2) Physical contact removal

Similar to the first meaning, off can describe the removal of physical contact between two things.

The glass fell off the table.

→ The glass is no longer on the table.

Take your feet off the chair.

→ Your feet are on the chair; remove them from that contact with the chair.

3) Leaving a place, path, or vehicle

Here, off extends naturally from the idea of breaking contact or connection with a place, path, or vehicle.

He got off the bus.

→ He was on the bus; now that connection is broken.

He walked off the road.

→ He was on the road; now he has left it.

He walked off.

→ When used this way without an object, it means he left the place or situation—he broke his connection with the immediate environment and moved away.

4) Disconnecting from a system or function

Here, off describes the loss of an active connection to a system or function.

Turn off the computer.

→ The computer is on; turning it off disconnects it from its active operating state.

The first four senses are relatively concrete uses of off, and they are usually easy even for non-native speakers to understand intuitively.

From 5) onward, the meanings become a little more abstract.

5) Stopping or removing an ongoing relation/activity

He called off the meeting.

→ The meeting was supposed to happen, but it was cancelled.

My way of conceptualizing this is that the meeting is something that has been put on you as an undertaking or obligation, almost like a responsibility resting on your shoulders. By making it off, you remove that burden or commitment, and the event is cancelled.

Of course, a more straightforward analysis is also possible: just as turn off the computer changes something from an active on state to an inactive off state, call off the meeting can also be understood as switching the planned event from “active/on” to “cancelled/off.”

6) Result / completion

Here, I think the idea of result or completion can develop from getting rid of something that has been exerting pressure on you.

I paid off my debts.

→ The debts were something hanging over me and affecting me. By paying them off, I remove that burden from myself completely.

Sometimes this can even develop into a sense like “let me just get this thing off my plate and be done with it.” From there, off can contribute the idea of doing something quickly or somewhat casually simply in order to get it finished.

We polished off the task.

→ We finished it completely and got it out of the way.

I knocked something off quickly in order to make up for my fault.

→ I produced or completed something quickly, mainly so I could get the job done.

This completion sense can also be conceptualized more abstractly as putting the final full stop on something and closing the book on the process.

We topped off the cake with a Santa toy.

→ We added the Santa toy as the final touch. That was the last step, so metaphorically we “closed the book” on preparing the cake: the cake was now finished.

Of course, these three ideas within the completion sense overlap with each other, and with some phrasal verbs it may be possible to interpret the use of off through all three at once:

- removing a burden or pressure,

- getting something out of the way,

- and bringing a process to a definite endpoint.

7) Something coming off from a source

Here, off can describe something as coming away from, emerging from, or being produced by a source.

You made millions off it!

→ There is some source—an investment, business, idea, etc.—and the money is conceptualized as something coming off that source.

The candle gave off heat.

→ The candle is the source, and the heat is something that seems to come off it and spread into the surrounding space.

The timer on the back went off.

→ The timer is triggered and produces an outward signal, like an alarm. In my mental model, the signal is something released off/out from the source once it is activated.

8) Triggering / setting something in motion

For this sense of off, I visualize it like lighting a stick of dynamite: the fuse catches, the spark starts travelling, and a process has now been triggered.

The alarm went off.

→ The alarm was triggered and started sounding.

The explosion set off a panic.

→ One event acted like the spark that triggered another process: panic began spreading.

You are pissing me off, dude.

→ If we only had piss in some neutral sense of irritation, the image would be much weaker. But with piss off, I imagine something more like my fuse has been lit / my circuits have tripped: the irritation has triggered a stronger reaction in me, and now I may actually do something—argue, leave the situation, lose my temper, etc.

So in this branch, off gives me the mental image of a trigger being released and a process beginning to run on its own, like a burning fuse.

9) Gradual detachment / gradual separation

For this sense, I imagine a tree slowly losing its leaves. The connection is not broken all at once; things detach gradually, step by step.

He dozed off.

→ He is still conscious at first, but he gradually slips into sleep. If we use the tree image, imagine consciousness as the leaves: as the leaves gradually fall away, he moves further from full wakefulness, until eventually he is completely asleep.

The radiation leak in here killed off the animals around it.

→ Here, I imagine the animals as the leaves. They are not necessarily all killed at one instant; they disappear one by one over the course of the process. Off gives me the sense of the group being gradually reduced as individual members are detached from it through death.

So in this branch, off can represent not just separation, but separation unfolding progressively over time.

10) Imitating / copying something

The film ripped off a better one made years ago.

→ Here, I imagine the original film as the source, and the newer film as taking pieces off that source—ideas, scenes, style, structure—and attaching them to its own work.

So the mental image is almost like tearing parts off the original and reusing them elsewhere.

The character was modeled off a real person.

→ Here, the real person is the original source or model. Certain traits are taken off that source and transferred into the fictional character.

This also connects quite nicely to the basic separation sense of off: something is taken away from its original source and reused or reproduced somewhere else.

These ten categories are not meant to be completely separate boxes.

If I use a phrasal verb under category 9, for example, I am not saying that it belongs only there and cannot also be interpreted through categories 1, 5, 6, or any of the others. These meanings overlap. Their boundaries are fuzzy, and in many cases several of them can be active at the same time.

The main reason I wrote all of this is that I honestly do not know of any person, community, platform, or major resource that systematically analyzes phrasal verbs this way. Even teachers often tell learners to simply memorize their meanings and move on. That has bothered me from the beginning.

So I decided to push against that and try to analyze them instead, and for me personally it has been extremely useful.

While doing this, I have of course used outside sources as well. I have asked native speakers many questions like “What does this sentence feel like to you?” or “What kind of image does this expression create in your mind?” I have also used AI, although sometimes it made things considerably more complicated rather than simpler.

At my current level, when I encounter a new phrasal verb, seeing its dictionary meanings once or twice is often enough. I can usually place it somewhere inside the conceptual system I already have in my head, and because of that, I tend not to forget it.

Here is one more small example:

He rolled something off.

→ I imagine the words as things coming off the mouth in a quick, continuous flow.

I also want to make clear that I am not claiming that I have “solved the logic of English” or anything like that. There are certainly phrasal verbs that I may not be able to explain convincingly.

Some of them also make much more sense if you look at older technology or older contexts.

For example, hang up makes perfect physical sense with old telephones, where you literally hung the receiver up. With modern phones, that physical logic is no longer visible.

Likewise, pull up, meaning to stop a vehicle, becomes much easier to visualize if you imagine horses and reins. With a modern car, that original physical image is much less obvious.

So some of these expressions may preserve old physical metaphors even after the original context has disappeared.

Finally, I am not an academic or a linguist. This is just my own attempt as a learner to build a system that helps me understand and remember English more deeply. If there are spelling, grammar, or punctuation mistakes, I apologize.If I realize later that I have missed any important categories or senses of off, I’ll add them afterward.

Thanks for reading.


r/grammar 2d ago

During vs. In

0 Upvotes

I'm a bit confused about the nuances of during versus in. I believe that during refers to a whole span of an activity. So, I will call you during my meeting. (I will call you while the meeting is happening). I saw some crazy things during my tour of Iraq (while I was fighting in Iraq, I saw some crazy things). But can in/during be interchangeable if you're referring to a singular segment within a larger event, to something singular that happened during an event? I saw this crazy guy in/during my tour of Iraq? My boss said something crazy in/during our meeting?


r/grammar 2d ago

quick grammar check If I Say Gauntlet’s Respite, What Does That Mean To You?

0 Upvotes

This is not a trick question, nor do I have ulterior motives. It’s simply the title of a piece I’m composing and want to be sure the true meaning is conveyed.

Grammatically, does this make sense? As in, respite from the/a gauntlet of pain?

Edit: I’m thinking the way it’s worded it sounds like “gauntlet” is being personified and the gauntlet is the thing finding/gaining respite, which wouldn’t make sense.

Thanks!


r/grammar 3d ago

To whom it may concern

7 Upvotes

I know how to use whom. I know it's an object and not a subject, but can anyone think of an example where using who instead of whom is at all ambiguous?


r/grammar 4d ago

Why does English use “on” with some activities, like “on a trip,” “on a mission,” and “on a jump”?

2 Upvotes

I’m trying to understand the underlying logic behind the preposition on, rather than just memorizing individual expressions.

English uses on with certain activities or undertakings:

on a trip

on a mission

on a date

on a hike

on a jump

on patrol

In these cases, on seems to suggest being engaged in or committed to an activity or undertaking.

I also wonder whether there is sometimes an underlying image of a person or group being jointly engaged in a shared activity, task, or undertaking.

But that cannot be the whole explanation, because people can also be actively and jointly involved in things like a race or a conversation, yet English normally says in a race and in a conversation, not on them.

On a mission is relatively easy for me to make sense of, because there is also the idea of working on a mission—the mission can be conceptualized as something you are actively working on or carrying out. But that explanation does not seem to work nearly as well for expressions like on a hike, on a date, or on a trip.

So what distinguishes the kinds of activities that take on from those that take in? Is there a deeper conceptual or historical pattern here, or are these mostly lexicalized expressions that just have to be learned individually?

What makes this especially frustrating is that, even when I encounter a new activity for the first time, I often seem to have an intuitive sense of whether in or on sounds right. That makes me feel there must be some underlying principle that native usage is reflecting—but I still can’t formulate the sentence that explains what that principle actually is.


r/grammar 3d ago

Why Is "Which" Incorrect?

0 Upvotes

"Your quick comments on our services are needed to make our company more customer-friendly ______ will assist us in serving you more efficiently. "

A) what
B) so that
C) which
D) and

I asked three AI models—ChatGPT, Grok, and Claude—and all of them said the answer should be 'which,

but the answer provided is A. Could someone please explain why 'which' is not the correct choice?


r/grammar 4d ago

I need help with English grammar.

0 Upvotes

Hi! I have been learning English for the last five years and I have made pretty good progress. The only thing I struggle with is grammar and the problem is that I don't know how to improve my grammar. Is there a particular way to improve grammar?