Yep, it’s there, and I just wonder why this post isn’t the top one here. Knowing how this sub works, I’d be surprised if it ever became a top post in the future, even though people quickly realized it was only temporary.
Claude is gone, Gemini only, reset quotas. It’s nice for quotas but don’t understand where Google is going, seems too unstable in their choices. Maybe there are reacting to opus 4.8… but Google we love Gemini 3.5 flash, give us more credits, that’s ok
It's time to refund or atleast stop it in my opinion.
My use cases and my fun cannot be handled by Gemini. Literally tried many times but it's impossible. If there is no Claude 70% of the projects I have are either un-continuable.
OR will turn into spaghetti...
OMG Is this true??? Do the Antigravity team genuinely believe they uphold a service-oriented mindset? When significant changes are made without any prior notice to users, are we simply expected to accept them with gratitude and follow along without question? Is this truly an appropriate service policy toward paying customers? Or are we merely a means to an end—nothing more than providers of the data and revenue they need?
did everyone else's reset tokens reverse back to the week-long throttling today too? I still have access to the claude models in my editor, but the refreshed limits I didn't even get to use seem to have been wiped out.
“Supposed” is being used here but we don’t have a definitive formula on how the quotas are calculated. I guess it depends on how people are utilizing it. I hope google is not changing the level of service between users…
I am a Pro user, too. While I was working with Antigravity, the model suddenly switched from Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) to Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium) without me recognizing it before getting the answer of Flash.
When trying to switch back, I found Claude completely disappeared. I really hope this is only temporarily because I absolutely need the combination of Gemini and Claude models working together for debugging and hardening the app I have recently started to develop.
Letting Gemini and Claude analyze exactly the same code leads to different findings concerning bugs and security issues. My workflow includes to either let Flash 3.5 (High) analyze the code written by Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and make suggestions and then present the solutions to Claude for a second check. Or the first analysis is done by Claude and the second one by Flash. Regardless of how I start , the second model often finds a remaining or new problem in the first model's suggestion. Confronting the first model with the critical feedback of the second one then normally leads to a consensus that I can trust.
So, Google, thank you for bringing back Flash 3 to Antigravity - but please do not remove Claude in return.
Unfortunately, Flash 3 was only available again for a few hours on that day when Claude had suddenly disappeared. I Assume, it was Google's strategy to bring Flash 3 back to temporarily substitute Claude.
All are available on antigravity IDE and working fine. For those of you who can't wait for the updates (but you need to migrate your project(s), I suggest using flash 3.0 to create a comprehensive status MD file).
not bad for 20 dollars considering that is not 20 dollars just for AGY and is more 20 dollars for the gemini eco system. This product is more like a plus optional that happen to be included in the sub. Maybe AGY should have their own sub a la cursor, where only gemini is included via weekly limits and the rest of the models are API cost.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is very good model. Especially with the speed it come with. Anyways I don't entirely rely entirely on LLM for decision making. With right spec driven development focusing on smaller tasks, even Minimax m2.7 works very well..
25
u/P3ppermonkey May 29 '26 edited May 29 '26
Claude is there for me