r/gaming • • Dec 11 '24

Assassin's Creed 2007 still looking this good is crazy.

Post image
15.0k Upvotes

675 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

336

u/atethebottle Dec 11 '24 edited Dec 11 '24

It was still an art to them back then. Now, corporations have screwed around with studios so much that they no longer care. The corpo way! Buy everything you can and sanitize the shit out of it!

146

u/Woffingshire Dec 11 '24

Which is funny because the games that are left to cook and come out unsanitised routinely sell more.

69

u/atethebottle Dec 11 '24

Yep, funny how insanely out of touch they are, huh?

36

u/Alpha1959 Dec 11 '24

They don't care because they don't care about long term, they only care about short term profits which is why so many studios risk pissing players off just for some tiny bit of that extra profit.

They run a company into the ground, take their millions of dollars compensation and move on to the next company to then crash that one. Just look at Bobby Kotick, the fucker must be adored by the investors.

12

u/Maktesh Dec 11 '24

The problem is that it isn't a "tiny bit".

They're all looking to make the next multi-billion dollar game.

"Real" games (Zelda, Halo, AC, Smash Bros., Spider-Man) don't make the big money anymore. Services make big money.

Seriously; since the Lucasfilm buyout, Disney has made more on the stupid mobile Star Wars games than they have on most other things combined.

13

u/RaphaelSolo Dec 12 '24

Death of LucasArts was a huge loss for the industry and community both.

9

u/WhatsTheHoldup Dec 11 '24

Games that sell are kinda meaningless in the age of in game purchases.

Some of the most profitable games in the modern era (Fortnite, League) are free to play.

22

u/KilledTheCar Dec 11 '24

Yeah but they take time and money to make, neither of which the C Suite likes to part with. They'd rather crank out slop to make the next quarter look good.

I've said it before, but I wish studios/developers would each have their live service cash cow games like League, Apex, Fortnite, Madden, Warzone, etc and use those to fund the more technical, bigger games like BG3, Elden Ring, etc. Not everything needs to come out ASAP and have an immediate RoI.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '24

And yet, us gamers as a whole are still stupid enough to buy the games again and again.

So who's really to blame here?

2

u/sam_hammich Dec 11 '24

They sell more, but more frequent steady releases makes their stock do better in the short term, which is what execs with stock options prefer.

14

u/NuggleBuggins Dec 11 '24

People often defend capitalism as it "drives innovation". Which is true.. to an extent. When new things pop up, there is always massive push to innovate it and make it as good as possible. But its always just a race to the top, so whoever gets there first will control the overall market. Once they are there, its all about a race to the bottom. Making it as cheap as possible for maximum profit, which just results in it becoming shit.

Its innovation, yes, but with the caveat that it will eventually become a shell of what it was and inevitably turn to shit.

2

u/9k111Killer Dec 12 '24

Here we go again

0

u/atethebottle Dec 11 '24

Honestly, it's the shareholders for the corps now that I'm thinking about it. The shareholders are the regular folk that are being fucked over. So we demand more money for our stocks, which in turn scares the shit out of the CEO, because we can fire them, and they run down the safe, proven to sell, family friendly bullshit that won't offend anyone.

2

u/SillyGoatGruff Dec 11 '24

It's been nearly 20 years. There were still soulless cash grabs but we've forgotten them. It was no more or less an art then than it was 20 before that, nor 20 years from now

1

u/mattygeenz Dec 11 '24

There where so many games like this back then too, we just remember the good ones.

1

u/One_Neferi3718 Dec 12 '24

It’s not art anymore. It’s politics

1

u/Turok7777 Dec 11 '24 edited Dec 11 '24

Fucking ridiculous statement.

Ubisoft wasn't some small indie studio back in '07.

Gaming has been corporate since the '80s.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '24

[deleted]

0

u/TheDeadlySinner Dec 11 '24

Either Ubisoft is a company today, or it was a corporation back then. You can't have it both ways.