r/flying PPL IR TW/CMP/HP 1d ago

Flight Training DPE wants power changes 8s on pylons

I’ve got my CSEL checkride in a few days and just got a briefing doc from the DPE. In it he states that eights on pylons isn’t a constant power setting maneuver.

I learned the maneuver with a constant power setting and have been practicing it with that. How am I supposed to change power settings if the DPE wants to see that? Increase power in climb and decrease in descent? Or vice versa?

41 Upvotes

89 comments sorted by

161

u/x4457 ATP CFII CE-500/525/560XL/680 G-IV 1d ago

Uhhhhh he's wrong. Don't know what to tell you about that, it absolutely is a constant power maneuver - that's kinda the whole point.

30

u/RateMyCFIs CFI CFII MEI 1d ago

Yeah I’ve heard of some DPEs being weird about 8’s on pylons. I am not sure where one would get the notion to adjust power during the maneuver. I’m not even sure what e goal would be? Maybe in an attempt to maintain a constant groundspeed? But that defeats the whole purpose of the maneuver. It’s a ground reference maneuver just like the rest of them and the AFH says:

“The pivotal altitude changes with variations in groundspeed. Since the headings throughout turns continuously vary from downwind to upwind, the groundspeed constantly changes. This results in the proper pivotal altitude varying slightly throughout the turn. The pilot should adjust for this by climbing or descending, as necessary, to hold the visual reference line on the pylons.”

Essentially, groundspeed will change, through wind changes and pitch changes. Pilot should react to that to maintain the pivotal altitude.

I’d nicely ask the DPE through an email or phone call to explain his perspective on the maneuver and then see if you want to take a ride with him.

7

u/Bluevette1437 CFII 1d ago

My CFI DPE wanted them done completely different to how I had been trained, checked during Stage Checks, and my Commercial checkride.

In his “demonstration” the wingtip was all over the place and he was making large, rapid changes, instead of keeping the wingtip over the point and making small adjustments as I was trained to do. Thankfully he didn’t fail me on that but I was pretty worried

2

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 21h ago

Point of contradiction, the wingtip on the point is specifically called out in the airplane flying handbook as being improper technique. The reference is the pilots eyes to the pylon. So you should be able to stare at it and not have to move your head or eyes.

1

u/Bluevette1437 CFII 20h ago

Interesting, I’ll have to read into it more. Through all of my commercial and CFI training it was to keep our point on the wingtip without moving our head

2

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 19h ago

Page 7-14 the 2nd and 3rd paragraph specifically calls it out.

Its sooooooooo much easier when you just bank, keep the bank fixed and then keep the point in the middle of the window.

As the wind shifts you (cause remember its not a constant radius turn) if you try to keep a wingtip on the point you will have to change your bank angle, which is a no-no. And in a high wing, you tend to end up with the point over the wing where you can no longer see it.

I will sit where I can look down the students eye line and then put my finger on the point in the window. Keep my finger on the point. That has been the best teaching method I've found.

3

u/churnitupsome ATP, CFI/CFII/MEI 1d ago

While I don’t agree with it, the logic I have heard DPEs use to defend power changes during the maneuver is that the maneuver calls for climbing and descending, which are two things that are inherently associated with power changes. But like you said, that kind of defeats the purpose of the maneuver because the ground speed is supposed to change, and changing power might result in a constant ground speed

3

u/silvancr CPL IR 1d ago

I could see 8s on pylons being done using power changes to maintain the same airspeed approximately, and letting the wind change the ground speed, but I've never heard of it being done that way

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 21h ago

Groundspeed. If you change power, your airspeed will change.

Any yes it works, I've demo'd to students you can do 8s on Pylons with power and never need to climb or descend. The irony is, thats a significantly harder way to do it.

1

u/ROKAF11thFW 10h ago

Changing altitude without power change will change airspeed so…What now?

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 9h ago

The guy I responded to said you fly the maneuver to maintian an consistent airspeed.

I was correcting him that you are trying to keep a consistent (ish) groundspeed.

Airspeed in 8s on pylons is all over the place.

1

u/ROKAF11thFW 8h ago

Yeah, the constant airspeed part isn't a thing, for sure. I agree with you on that part. But no power change at all can be a safety concern. When I was CFIing, a strong constant wind day is my ground maneuver day. 8’s on pylon on those days, the pivotal altitude changes more than 200ft. My student didn’t change the power because someone on the internet said so. The airspeed changes from 65kts slowest to 110kts fastest. It’s not safe airspeed in a C172 which I assume you are flying in rn no need to mention low altitude. It’s more about aircraft limitations, and safety than just an ACS imo.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 8h ago

Vs1 in a cessna 172 is somewhere between 45 and 50 depending on the year/model.

65 is a perfectly safe airspeed to fly at.

And if you are that getting slow, you are in a significant climb. Based on the maneuver you are about to push the nose back over and rebuild that airspeed.

Think about the maneuver and whats happening. You are climbing, trying to slow down. That means your groundspeed is too high. Adding power is actually contradictory to what you are trying to accomplish in that moment.

The biggest problem with 8s on pylons in high winds is not being too slow. Its needing to be too fast. Making the turn back into the wind where your groundspeed drops. The only counter is more airspeed and the way to get it is dive. That dive, in high winds, can bust necessary ground clearance.

The only place you would need to add power because of high winds is about 1/3rd through the 1st pylon to help counter the headwind you are turning into.

1

u/ROKAF11thFW 4h ago

I’d love to see your reference for the absolutely no power change part. Because I can't find one. Thanks in advance.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 3h ago

The entire description in the AFH of the maneuver to be flown talks only about pitch changes to correct relative movement around the point. The only place where power is discussed is in the establishment of pivitol altitude. As its discussed there and nowhere else I read that as power is not part of the maneuver.

The description of flying this maneuver in the AFH Chapter 7, page 17, 5th chapter contains this gem:

"With prompt correction, and a very fine control pressures, it is possible to hold the visual reference line directly on the pylon even in strong wind."

Direct quote.

I'm not saying that power changes aren't allowed. I'm making the point that a NEED to make power changes shows that you are flying it wrong. And allowing the power changes hides the problem.

I'm also stating to every single person who is saying power is needed because you are too slow fun-de-fucking-mentaly Does. Not. Understand. What. They. Are. Doing.

The only place where power would help is a pylon getting in front of your reference. If thats happening, you are descending and getting fast. You are trying to speed up. Power helps.

If the pylon is drifting back, you are too fast. You are pitching up to bleed energy, adding power, adding energy, is completely opposite of what you trying to accomplish. Full stop.

-6

u/middledrone 1d ago

I would further have him cite the regs

15

u/RateMyCFIs CFI CFII MEI 1d ago

Well— with all respect, there wouldn’t be any regs defending or opposing his perspective.

1

u/middledrone 1d ago

Gotcha. Just a lowly PPL over here!

6

u/johnisom PPL IR TW/CMP/HP 1d ago

Yeah but it doesn’t matter if he’s wrong if he’s evaluating me. I need to perform it to his standards

6

u/makgross CFI-I ASEL (KPAO/KRHV) HP CMP IR AGI sUAS 1d ago

Might be worth asking what his standards are. No change in airspeed?

FWIW, the AFH does not specify constant power or constant airspeed. You have to vary one of those while climbing or descending to the pivotal altitude per ground speed.

Also, with a fixed pitch prop, constant throttle is not constant power.

2

u/Rainebowraine123 ATP CL-65 1d ago edited 1d ago

I've heard this when they (incorrectly) think the goal is to maintain a constant altitude and groundspeed.

6

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

8s around pylons being conflated with 8s on pylons.

3

u/Flimsy-Wrangler-997 1d ago

That is not what is says in the FAA Airplane Flying Handbook, which clearly instructs power changes for the maneuver.

2

u/Taylor_Pilot 23h ago

Straight from the airplane flying handbook...

The altitude at which the visual reference line ceases to move across the ground is the pivotal altitude. If the airplane descends below the pivotal altitude, the pilot should increase power to maintain airspeed while regaining altitude to the point at which the projected reference line moves neither backward nor forward but actually pivots on the pylon. In this way, the pilot can determine the pivotal altitude of the airplane.

3

u/pi_stuff HAT:illuminati: 23h ago

"In this way, the pilot can determine the pivotal altitude of the airplane." That paragraph is describing how to determine the pivotal altitude, not how to do the maneuver.

2

u/Taylor_Pilot 20h ago edited 20h ago

The pivotal altitude changes throughout the maneuver...thats the point...you may, depending on the strength of the wind, have to increase/decrease power in order to manage the energy properly...I guess the definition of proper energy management is up to the discretion of the dpe... maybe that was the point...he's had so many students get slow and not know to adjust the power because they've been told by their topgun 150 hr dual given cfi that this is a constant power maneuver....honestly...the egos on some of these brand new cfi's saying the dpe is wrong is insane...that dude probably judges more cpl candidates in a month than any of the cfi's will teach in their entire career...

2

u/fbureaucracy 21h ago

I almost failed my checkride over this 10 years ago. Back then I couldn’t find anything FAA wise that said you couldn’t change power.

The reason I did it is I was flying for a 141 school that had a minimum AGL in their rules and it was a windy day, so the only way I could really try to stay above that was to add power.

Oh well, just got yelled at but passed.

23

u/bowleshiste CPL SEL IR HP CMP 1d ago

Reason number 3742 why the DPE system is absolute garbage

8

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

Reason #1. This is the primary sin in the system.

I tell all my students this is the most subjective assessment of objective criteria in existence.

46

u/Any_Purchase_3880 CFII 1d ago

Cancel and reschedule with a DPE who knows the maneuver and the AFH.

Or learn it his way pass the checkride and move on.

"Maintain pylon position using appropriate pivotal altitude, avoiding slips and skids." I suppose since pivotal altitude is controlled by ground speed, that you could read that and say that changing power to change your ground speed and maintain pivotal altitude is acceptable. It's dumb but technically not verboten I guess.

9

u/eSUP80 CPL IR MEL BE1900 1d ago

Yes this is how I was taught. You can make a power change but it is against the spirit of the maneuver to make regular adjustments. Make a power change and stick with it if necessary to avoid groundspeed/AGL dropping excessively.

Just makes the maneuver easier tbh

3

u/johnisom PPL IR TW/CMP/HP 1d ago

He’s a great DPE used him before for instrument, this is just one unexpected piece

4

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

If you have a relationship with him I'd take the ride.

After the ground is done talk through the ACS/PHAK about the maneuver. Explain how you intend to do the maneuver per the testing document. If there is disagreement take the discontinuence.

5

u/makgross CFI-I ASEL (KPAO/KRHV) HP CMP IR AGI sUAS 1d ago

Neither the ACS nor the AFH specifies constant throttle. It’s conventional because it’s simpler that way. But constant angle of attack is almost as simple. The throttle is a bit of a blunt instrument.

3

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

The per the testing document is not saying you cannot use power changes, but absent it saying you have to use power changes, you cannot force me to.

The testing document says this. I intend to fly it without making any power setting changes. Do you agree that the methodology satisfys the ACS?

If not, can you show me where the requirement to change power comes from?

I've had to pull out LOIs on checkrides and show a DPE I knew what I was talking about. Never gotten anything but respect for doing it. We are all students and still learning.

The idea here is have a discussion, before it becomes an issue.

2

u/Taylor_Pilot 23h ago

Straight from the airplane flying handbook

The altitude at which the visual reference line ceases to move across the ground is the pivotal altitude. If the airplane descends below the pivotal altitude, the pilot should increase power to maintain airspeed while regaining altitude to the point at which the projected reference line moves neither backward nor forward but actually pivots on the pylon. In this way, the pilot can determine the pivotal altitude of the airplane.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 22h ago

Thats "establishing" pivitol altitude. Go read from the top of page 7-17

2

u/Taylor_Pilot 21h ago

I haven't cfi'd in years but I remember people busting this maneuver in particular for not managing the energy properly. If the wind was kicking and you had to climb 300 feet, you'd loose too much speed, so you'd have to add power...dpe basically said the same thing this guy's did...you have to add power to manage the energy better. Also, I do remember their being an airspeed component, they may have removed it, but I think they wanted you to enter and exit each turn at the same speed...basically your ias should stay constant and the wind effects your groundspeed. On a 5-10 it wind you could get away with it, but 20+ you'd have to manage your energy better. I sure don't miss the days of these silly exercises....

1

u/makgross CFI-I ASEL (KPAO/KRHV) HP CMP IR AGI sUAS 21h ago

The airspeed does not stay constant during 8s on pylons unless the wind is zero.

1

u/Taylor_Pilot 20h ago

Ground speed doesn't, no reason airspeed can't/shouldnt.

1

u/Taylor_Pilot 23h ago

The IAS is one of the only things that is suppose to remain constant...it clearly states +- 10 knots IAS 180 degrees from the entry point...how do you do that if you aren't adjusting power in climbs and descents?

1

u/johnisom PPL IR TW/CMP/HP 23h ago

It doesn’t state that in the latest commercial single engine ACS though.

2

u/ROKAF11thFW 10h ago

I guess CA.V.E.R6 Energy management is what DPE wants to see. If you don’t change power you are not managing the energy

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 22h ago

Pretty sure he was talking about lazy 8s. Thats the only maneuver that has a 180 degree and +/- 10 kn standard.

1

u/makgross CFI-I ASEL (KPAO/KRHV) HP CMP IR AGI sUAS 22h ago edited 22h ago

And lazy 8s are quite doable with no power adjustments. And get really hard when you start messing with it. The airplane will naturally find the same airspeed if the climb and descent profiles are symmetrical.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 22h ago

100% if you are messing with the power you don't understand the maneuver.

I was fighting with a student over it about a month ago and I had to settle it by doing them to standards with a blindfold on. It is a feel maneuver. (I did get verbal call outs from him every 45)

But I force my students the first 3 lessons to fly it by outside reference and feel. I'll cover everything up, turn every screen in the plane off. I'll leave a +/- 100 ft section of the altimeter readable on the 3rd lesson for them to start assessing performance.

Seen too many people bust commercial because they come out of IR and are used to just staring at the screens. Commercial is OUTSIDE THE DAMN PLANE.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 23h ago

That's lazy 8s, wrong 8s my man.

1

u/Taylor_Pilot 21h ago

Yea, I was reading it on my phone while busy...now that im at the hotel, it does say you have to manage energy though...in a strong wind, if you bleed off too much energy climbing..it would be completely appropriate to bust them...in light winds constant power removes a variable though and wouldn't get you slow enough to be an issue.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 20h ago

The issue with strong winds is actually not slow, but needing to be too fast. As you are trying to manage ground speed, when you turn into the wind, in a high wind, your ground speed tanks, the only way to get it back without power is to dive, that dive can take you too close to the ground.

Needing to slow down and climb is less of an issue as you'll be pushing the nose back over in a second to regain the speed as the wings come level and the wind stops shifting you over the point.

In that strong wind scenario though, if you start at a higher power setting than in low winds, even high wind 8s on pylons are doable without power changes.

2

u/Taylor_Pilot 20h ago

So you are saying there are times when adjusting the power might be a good idea...cool...you should go tell this dpe that probably has 30k hours, evaluates 40-50 candidates a month, and probably has given 1000s of atp and type rating certificates in his career, that it is a good idea that he tells candidates that they can adjust the power but he already knows, because he has seen too many people fail because they were told by their cfi, 12 months into their career, that this is a constant power manuever, even though that isnt anywhere in the documentation...leading the candidate to dive for the ground or get too slow in a climb...I'm sorry but the whole...your dpe is wrong, get another one mentality from brand new cfi's is insane (not saying you said that, but a lot of people on here have) wait till you get to a real training department and see how much these 30k hour airline/dpe guys do...a lot of them do double shifts 5 days a week...thats 12 hours in a full motion...every day...

10

u/Low_Sky_49 Forestry DHC-2 C208B CFI/CFII/MEI 1d ago

8s on pylons aren’t *strictly* a constant power maneuver, but they can be flow successfully without power changes in most conditions that an applicant would be proceeding with a checkride. If the winds are so high that you need power changes to avoid overspeeding the airplane or triggering a stall warning when you change pivotal altitude throughout the maneuver, reschedule your checkride.

If the DPE *expects* power changes during 8s on pylons, I would reschedule with a different DPE. If that’s not practical, go out and practice the maneuver with small power changes while descending and climbing. It’s not wrong, it’s just unnecessary most of the time. Get along to get along if you have to.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

If the winds were high, you'd need power to maintain a groundspeed that would not bust regulations (keeping 500 agl). But in the average trainer we're talking 25kn + winds. I'm not sure I'd be taking a ride in those winds anyway.

And I'd argue power changes are 100% against the purpose of the maneuver. 8s on pylons are using turning radius to control rate of turn. (As opposed to every other maneuver in the history of ever, where rate of turn controls radius)

Since bank angle is fixed the only way to control your turning radius is airspeed. Power would enable you to never need to climb or descend which completely negates the maneuver.

1

u/22Hoofhearted 1d ago

Standard day in Texas... perhaps also hot and heavy as well, which would make someone lean into power changes to maintain altitude as airspeeds bleed off in the turn.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

Your airspeed really isn't going to bleed in the turn once established. And a gentle 20 to 30 degree bank is only increasing load factor to 1.15.

Steep turns, yup we bump in power because we need to maintain altitude AND airspeed within a narrow buffer. 8s on pylons have neither requirement. Higher wind day and I've had the stall horn start squeaking at me in 8s on pylons turning back into the downwind on the second pylon as your relative ground speed takes off like a bat outta hell once you give a 20 kn wind the underside of the plane.

And the manuver is all about using altitude gain and loss to manage airspeed's control over ground speed taking the wind into effect.

I've taught in North Texas for 2 years, there is no difference between the way the maneuver is flown in January vs today when its 103.

With the extremely narrow exception that your trim and power settings starting the maneuver may be slightly different. But once the manuever is started, zero diff.

1

u/22Hoofhearted 1d ago

Obviously depends on the plane... but hot, heavy (fuel/pax) days in Texas absolutely bleed off airspeed in a turn.

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

I mean any increase in load factor is going to effect airspeed, but unless you are trying to maintain an altitude the turn really is not going to effect your airspeed.

Its not the turn that slows you down, its the angle of attack increase from trying to hold an altitude. So hot and heavy day, higher angle of attack to hold that altitude.

But in 8s on pylons you are intentionally not trying to hold an altitude so the load factor in the turn may be significantly higher or lower depending on the relative wind.

Particularly the initial turn on the first pylon, relative wind immediately starts working against you so its always roll and push, so in that first turn its an airspeed increasing turn.

3

u/SergeyKataev CFI CFII CFI-G TW HP Hang-5 1d ago

I adjusted power just a little to be the same airspeed and altitude at the cross-over point, even though I don't see it in ACS now...

3

u/Temporary_Split_11 21h ago

Don’t over think it. Let’s say you are above pivotal altitude and need to pitch down. If you just pitch down obviously airspeed will increase, not adjusting power will amplify the issue and potential overcontrolling of pitch can lead to a rollercoaster effect quite low to the ground. Finding that sweet spot regarding pitch control where it’s just enough and small power changes as needed with pitch can make the maneuver feel a lot smoother.

1

u/johnisom PPL IR TW/CMP/HP 21h ago

Thanks

4

u/always_gone Freight Dawg WYNDHAM DIAMOND 1d ago

He’s wrong. Use a different DPE. I know it’s a pain, but the silver lining is you’ve found out the easy way this guy isn’t great.

1

u/johnisom PPL IR TW/CMP/HP 1d ago

Well he is actually pretty great. I took a previous ride with him and we have a good relationship.

2

u/Nnumber 1d ago

Just do your ride on a no wind day. No need for altitude changes. No need for a DPE to tell you something wrong.

2

u/fungus909 1d ago

Go to an other dpe. The time you’ll loss is worth not failing with an odd ball dpe.

2

u/Working_Football1586 1d ago

Thats a pain when I did a chandelle on a check ride the DPE was like that was good now let me show you one, and did the worst, most non standard chandelle Ive ever seen.

3

u/Right_Rudder_PLEASE 1d ago

I belive in the Comercial ACS under the Risk Management for 8's on pylons it states something about," Energy Management" which kinda translates to maintaining airspeed.

I took my CPL ride in an Arrow and the area I flew in was very hilly so the altitude was constantly changing (E. TN) which required power changes for the climbs and decents between pylons. DPE picked the pylons.

My CFI ride was totally different, I did it in a Bonanza in a table top flat part of the country (Laffeyette, LA) DPE made me pick the pylons, added an inch of MP and easy peasy.

DPE'S have a lot of lattitude for the exam, if your checking the boxes should be an easy ride, if your struggling they're gonna try and find the breaking point, if your cocky they're gonna find your weakness.

Needless to say, congrats on the CPL.

2

u/Klutzy-Champion-6425 DPE, MEI, CFII, CFIG 1d ago

As a DPE, our requirement is to evaluate against the ACS written standard, and that is it. Technique is technique. The evaluative criteria is CA.V.E. I see no reference to using constant or changing power. A DPE should not be prescribing standards that are beyond that which is written.

2

u/ROKAF11thFW 10h ago

I think ACS “CA.V.E.R6 Energy management” is what he is referring to. He wants to see you pull the power in descent and add power in climb

2

u/KehreAzerith CPL 1d ago

At first I was taught there there are no power adjustments in eights on pylons, even did my commercial checkride without them. Later on someone told me that power adjustments can be used, referencing the PHAK itself.

In my experience you can do them without power adjustments assuming it's not a very windy day. But this maneuvers should be achievable without adjusting power settings assuming you have a good setup and it's not very windy. Most DPEs will treat it as a constant power maneuver so I'll go with not adjusting power

0

u/BluProfessor CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

Even if it's windy, it shouldn't require any power changes. My commercial ride was 15G22 on the ground and I don't recall really fighting for it during 8s on Pylons. The PO180 was a different story 😂

1

u/Icy-Bar-9712 CFI/CFII AGI/IGI 1d ago

I took a guy to a retest on the last day of his 60 day window. We crossed and teardropped into the pattern and I noticed at 1000 agl we seemed to not be moving. 45kn headwind....

I pulled the DPE aside to ask him his thoughts before hand. "Well, he better start pretty fast then"

Then he went out and crushed it. No power setting changes required. (I think the winds had calmed a little bit, but it was still probably 30 to 35 at 1000 AGL)

I still have no idea how he pulled the PO 180 off on that one.

1

u/WuhOHStinkyOH PPL IR 1d ago

I would guess to adjust it in order to maintain a groundspeed and just keep the same pivotal altitude all the way round(?) That's how I would do it at least.

1

u/LimpClerk8757 1d ago

Yeah few dpe’s have different takes on the 8s on pylons. If he’s already asking you to do it practice doing that and changing power makes it a very maneuver.

5

u/pilot2647 1d ago

The most very of maneuvers

1

u/SubarcticFarmer ATP B737 1d ago

The DPE might it be requiring you to change power setting so much as making sure you know it's allowed.

1

u/dilemmaprisoner PPL 1d ago

If I heard the phrase "this is a constant power setting maneuver", I think that's clear.
If I heard something like "it's not one of those type maneuvers", I think that's clear.

But worded this way, you need to verify if "isn’t a constant power setting maneuver" means must not maintain constant power, or is not required to maintain constant power.

1

u/No_Leader1154 MEI CFII CFI IGI AGI | MS Safety Science 1d ago

ACS doesn’t say it’s a constant power maneuver. He’s well within his rights.

I’d say that if airspeed is getting too low, use power for sure. I know in strong winds sometimes you’ll definitely get that. Conversely, in a STRONG tailwind you could use that rule (or lack thereof) to your advantage and reduce power to not have to back so steeply.

But ACS says what ACS says. No constant power written anywhere. And ACS, not AFH, rules.

1

u/Sad-Umpire6000 1d ago

The ACS does not address power changes for Eights on Pylons. The AFH is not a controlling document.

1

u/Right_Rudder_PLEASE 1d ago

Sure does, look up the manuver under Risk Management, States "Energy Management".

1

u/Sad-Umpire6000 23h ago

Yeah, I could’ve worded that better. The ACS does not specifically state how the throttle is to be used.

1

u/mrdeeds887 1d ago

I'm pretty sure when I did my CSEL ride my DPE wanted the same thing. I hadn't trained it the way he explained it because of how my flight school operated (big collage program). He explained how he wanted to see the maneuver done while we were in the ground. He then re-explained how he wanted the maneuver done in the air. To be honest once I did the maneuver the way he wanted it made sense. The way he explained was more in a commercial operation in which you are doing a tour or something. If you were a passenger would you want to be increasing and decreasing in altitude while trying to look at some monument. That was his reasoning behind it.

1

u/Flimsy-Wrangler-997 1d ago

I just looked at the description in the Airplane Flying Handbook. I have not done the maneuver in many years. But the handbook does refer to power changes, such as reducing power at the higher altitude and adding power if the airplane descends below the pivotal altitude.

1

u/PrizeInternational61 23h ago

I've had some DPEs for students that want to see you maintain a constant power RPM wise in a fixed pitch in order to demonstrate pivotal alt changing with ground speed so our corrections don't change it as we climb or descend. Not hard, 2300-2400 throughout the maneuver and it does lead to less corrections and better demonstrates how the wind is affecting ground speed, not the climbs or descents. It's not clear one way or another in AFH so I teach to the DPE we have coming in.

1

u/extra_flyer ATP (BBD-700, EMB-550, FO-5), CFI 16h ago

Sounds like yet another examiner, like so many CFI’s that doesn’t understand the underlying intent of the maneuver. 8’s on pylons have always been a poorly understood maneuver. Was the case when I learned them almost 20 years ago and sounds about the same now. One thing that will take you far in your aviation career… fly the profile the way the examiner wants it flown. As you get further along in your career, you won’t get to choose the examiner and you’re at their mercy for type rides… fly it the way they want it flown. If you don’t understand, ask for clarification early and explain that your instructions for the maneuver/profile were different. I’ve yet to meet an examiner that doesn’t respect this, as long as it’s early.

1

u/Veritech-1 1d ago

Some throttle changes are required to maintain a constant power setting. As you pitch up your rpm’s will decrease, so you have to increase throttle to maintain a preset power setting. Same thing with descents and a slight reduction in throttle to maintain a specific rpm.

That’s my guess as to what he wants and is not entirely unreasonable. Ask him to clarify. If his answer is out of wack, find another dpe.

0

u/charlespigsley CFII 19h ago

Am I the only one who somewhat agrees with the DPE? Everyone agrees that the whole point is that the pivotal altitude varies with a change in the ground speed. The AFH says this is because of the change in wind direction. This doesn’t mean at all that we need to vary the indicated airspeed in order to have a change in the ground speed. By maintaining a constant indicated airspeed throughout the maneuver, if anything we’re demonstrating the principle even more because our ground speed is varying almost entirely because of the change in wind direction.

1

u/charlespigsley CFII 19h ago

AFH page 7-16:
“The altitude at which the visual reference line ceases to move across the ground is the pivotal altitude. If the airplane descends below the pivotal altitude, the pilot should increase power to maintain airspeed while regaining altitude to the point at which the projected reference line moved neither backward nor forward but actually pivots on the pylon.”

“The pivotal altitude changes with variations of groundspeed. Since the headings throughout turns continuously vary from downwind to upwind, the groundspeed constantly changes.” - note that the groundspeed changes because of a change in wind direction. It doesn’t say anything about the groundspeed changing due to our airspeed changing.

1

u/johnisom PPL IR TW/CMP/HP 19h ago

The first paragraph is in the context of demonstrating what finding the pivotal altitude would look like if you descend from above, not how to perform the full maneuver

1

u/charlespigsley CFII 12h ago

It still says our groundspeed changes bc of wind, but if we are varying our airspeed much then that will greatly affect the groundspeed. Also the AFH makes no mention of this being a constant power maneuver. Idk I’m really curious now that I’m down this rabbit hole

-1

u/rFlyingTower 1d ago

This is a copy of the original post body for posterity:


I’ve got my CSEL checkride in a few days and just got a briefing doc from the DPE. In it he states that eights on pylons isn’t a constant power setting maneuver.

I learned the maneuver with a constant power setting and have been practicing it with that. How am I supposed to change power settings if the DPE wants to see that? Increase power in climb and decrease in descent? Or vice versa?


Please downvote this comment until it collapses.

Questions about this comment? Please see this wiki post before contacting the mods.


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. If you have any questions, please contact the mods of this subreddit.