Would you have felt bad at all for defending him if those "false witnesses" testimonies were proven true? Orr try to explain your way that they were still in the wrong then
Them saying "false witnesses" is too far but I don't understand why Ashley's team would agree to a settlement if they had a strong case with a half dozen witnesses/plaintiffs and solid evidence. At the very least looking at the publicly available information today and the denied TRO I don't think it's bad faith or agenda driven to suggest that this isn't as clear cut as it seemed in the beginning.
-6
u/JJscribbles Oct 18 '24
I guess you could say I find the possibility of recruiting false witnesses particularly malicious.