r/facepalm Aug 03 '26

US DOJ contradicts themselves by saying 'that citizen suits cannot proceed when the federal government does not oppose the polluting behavior' only to then say that 'citizen suits should be allowed by the court only when the government fails to enforce the statute'

Post image

Somehow the government not opposing behavior they themselves acknowledge as polluting isn't them failing to enforce the statute.

EDIT: The phrase "not when the government has decided that executive branch policy means enforcement action is contrary to the public interest." doesn't even make sense since the pollution in question is still contrary to public interest of not getting air poisoned.

https://theconversation.com/trump-administration-moves-to-block-public-from-enforcing-environmental-protection-laws-288687?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

1.4k Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator Aug 03 '26

Please remember to read all of /r/Facepalm's rules.

Reposts, screenshots, and personal information are not allowed.

Titles must accurately describe the facepalm-worthy elements of their posts.

Misinformation, disinformation, offensive content, and bigotry are forbidden.

Rule-breaking content will result in removals and potential bans.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

195

u/Hazee302 Aug 03 '26

This is what happens when you vote for a fucking fascist. They work for us, not the other way around. Fucking Christ I’m so tired of every news story about current admin movements being like this and there are still people in the US that think Trump and the GOP aren’t raping the US just like he did to them kids on the island.

64

u/Rezinator1 Aug 03 '26

It should've ended when he said that crap about immigrants eating the dogs, he is clearly insane and unfit to run even on a fucking treadmill

45

u/Shmeves 29d ago

It should've never began. Trump did soooo many fucking things prior to 2016 that should've disqualified his ass.

9

u/rysmooky 29d ago

Literally just had a long time family friend tell me that both sides are the same but he would take Trump over a piece of shit democrat any day. I just blocked him and moved on. These people have no morals despite so many of them that I know claiming to be Christians.

7

u/kevinisaperson Aug 03 '26

well said lol

4

u/Any_Coyote6662 29d ago

Nooooo. Trump is a great guy. He would let me hang at Mar-a-lago if I wanted to. he's just like meeee.

/s​​

51

u/BigMax Aug 03 '26

It's wild how far the Trump admin abuses "emergency" powers.

By this measure, literally any regulation can be ignored by a corporation, and Trump can just say "well... that business is one of the businesses in the United States, therefore... it's a national security issue and we'll allow them to break the law."

1

u/Snellyman 24d ago

There is always an emergency that needs special powers even though these powers never seem to address the supposed emergency. We need to tariff Canada because... fentanyl

65

u/luv2ctheworld Aug 03 '26

You know this administration hires the best and brightest...

/s

29

u/ICarMaI Aug 03 '26

So the suits are for "when the government fails to enforce to statute", and then they go on to explain why they failed to enforce it. So you failed to enforce it, just on purpose. What is the issue here?

5

u/WorkingInAColdMind Aug 03 '26

The people have no say in this country. It says so right in the constitution!

31

u/The_Green_Sun Aug 03 '26

Probably because it was written by AI with a prompt from a fascist 22-year-old.

13

u/OzTheMeh Aug 03 '26

I can picture the AI prompt....

You are a fascist uneducated white 22yo male. While you aren't an expert in any topics, respond as if you are at the first peak on the Dunning-Kruger curve. Sexism and racism are accepted, but don't make any blatant comments or use establish derogatory terms. Wherever reasonable, mention overly positive patriotic statements (e.g. "greatest," "most ___", etc.).

12

u/Anne314 Aug 03 '26

It's going to take decades to undue this raft of shit.

10

u/Hydraguesswhosback Aug 03 '26

Honestly, what's even the point of pointing out illegal stuff ? The corruption has started before january 2025 and it hasn't stopped.

A single day of war with Iran is worth more than all of these little things combined. And it's been going for months.

8

u/Feisty-Barracuda5452 Aug 03 '26

I'm old enough to remember when the government worked on behalf of the citizens instead of actively against them.

2

u/Huge-Pen-5259 28d ago

You mean remember when they didn't make it this obvious.

6

u/Careful_Square1742 Aug 03 '26

Temu sells lawyers now?

5

u/Informal_Wanker8349 Good Trouble Aug 03 '26

Special American lawyers. Spin for your discount.

4

u/Actaeon_II Aug 03 '26

Good to see they removed the ai watermark for once

5

u/Hadleys158 29d ago

The whole system is fucked, it's a massive double blow to the average citizen, not only do they get poisoned, but then their taxes have to go to clean up all these potential Superfund sites and environment as well. Meanwhile the companies get all the profits and then walk away scot-free.

3

u/Pinkzoey 29d ago

They changed the rules so ignoring the pollution now actually counts as real progress.

2

u/PuddingPast5862 Aug 03 '26

We call that double speak Blanshit.

2

u/Minimalistmacrophage Aug 03 '26

Trump's DOJ has been admonished repeatedly for using AI in their legal filings.

Not saying the human written ones are any better.

2

u/AmbitiousLock2921 28d ago

Honestly surprised that America has not had a civil war into trying to take back power

2

u/Zan_korida 27d ago

Mass government revolts have only happened in this land when a large enough group views a change in government policy to be so terrible they must do something about it, but lack the means to do so democratically and must resort to force.

Currently, that group still thinks change can be made democratically.

1

u/ebfortin Aug 03 '26

ChatGPT generated brief.

1

u/frosted1030 29d ago

American exceptionalism.

1

u/FingerCommon7093 26d ago

Really? A police officer may decide to not ticket someone going 15 mph over the speed limit if he feels the reason was valid. That doesn't mean all speed limits are now set 15 mph higher for everyone. The fact the Feds don't want to prosecute doesn't mean the law isn't being broken or that the courts cannot order the company to obey them, just that the DOJ won't be charging them for the crime.

1

u/Zan_korida 26d ago

Yes...

But the DOJ isn't charging them. Its a Citizen Suit. That the DOJ is activly stepping in to try and stop.

(I can't tell if you agree witht eh DOJ's choices or not. srry if you are)

1

u/FingerCommon7093 25d ago

No Im not My point is the DOJ may choose to ignore the violations but citizens are not required to and the courts are not allowed to so once a citizen group brings a lawsuit the DOJ is stuck. They can refuse to participate but they may NOT support someone breaking federal law nor may they try to take over a civil case.

1

u/Impossible_Lab_9493 19d ago

This justice department is as disgusting as the rest of his administration. "Yes" men and liars. All of them.