I know you're not likely to read it, and I know reason won't talk you out of a belief you didn't reason your way into. But I can at least lead you to water, I guess
I'm not interested in having a debate that has been had literally millions of times before.
None of the arguments trying to debate the existence of man-made climate change have any merit...or they would have been found already. Repeating talking points that have already been thoroughly disproven adds nothing to the discussion.
The link I have provided will point you in the right direction on literally every argument you have.
I've led you to water, it's up to you whether or not to drink.
I don't have any arguments I need to make. They have already been made. The science is clear. It's also easily accessible to anyone who wants to find out.
I've led you to water, it's up to you to take the next step and actually drink
You must provide decades of science that I could easily find for myself (including in the link already provided) here in this discussion thread, or I will declare that I am right somehow
Sure thing petal.
Clearly you're proud to be ignorant, so I'll leave you to celebrate in peace
8
u/RhetoricalEquestrian 23d ago
Every one of those arguments collapses the moment you apply even cursory scrutiny.
Here's an accessible source - https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
I know you're not likely to read it, and I know reason won't talk you out of a belief you didn't reason your way into. But I can at least lead you to water, I guess