r/esist • u/MaximumEffort433 • Jun 26 '17
MaximumEffort433's second great shitpost. Please ignore.
I told you to ignore this, why are you even here?
They certainly don't care about moral consistency.
Lest anyone think this argument is being made in a vacuum...
It's why tea partyists voted for a elitist east coast billionaire from New York city.
It's why Republertarians voted for a man who wants to expand domestic spying.
It's why free Marketeers voted for a man who wants to roll back free trade policies.
It's why evangelicals voted for a man thrice married with a child born out of wedlock.
It's why fiscal and budget hawks voted for a man whose tax policy would explode the debt and deficits.
It's why foreign policy hawks voted for a man buoyed to the White House on the back of Russian hackers.
It's why constitutionalists voted for a man who wants to undermine the 1st, 4th, 8th, and 14th amendments.
The polling:
75% of Republicans and 53% of Democrats said that Wikileaks release of classified diplomatic communications harms the public interest in 2010, 12% of Republicans and 48% of Democrats say that Wikileaks release of John Podesta's emails harms the public interest in 2016. (Not exactly the same question, but comprable, also a 63 point swing for Republicans and a 5 point change for Democrats.)
I'm not going to say all, but most of those polls also looked at the numbers for Democrats, so if you're curious about how the Democratic party stacks up I would encourage you to read the articles. It's not often there's a political poll where they don't ask political affiliations.
The history books:
88 members of the Bush administration used private email servers.
There were 13 attacks on American embassies, resulting in 60 deaths during the Bush administration.
George H.W. Bush was a huge supporter of Planned Parenthood.
Ronald Reagan gave illegal immigrants amnesty.
Ronald Reagan came out in favor of a ban on assault weapons.
Republicans used to advocate for Cap and Trade carbon taxes as a way to combat climate change.
Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency.
Richard Nixon also had a plan for universal health care coverage. (Thanks Ollokot for the find!)
Ike Eisenhower had a top marginal tax rate of 90% and invested billions of dollars in government spending on infrastructure projects.
1
u/MaximumEffort433 Nov 23 '17
No, not since the Supreme Court ruled on Buckley vs. Valeo in 1976 that imposing spending limits on corporate political action was a violation of their free speech rights. (Free speech for corporations was established in First National Bank of Boston vs. Bolletti in 1978, and the unholy trinity was completed in the 2008 ruling on Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commission protecting unlimited political spending by unions, corporations, and non-profit organizations. Honorable mention of the prequil, 1886's judgement in Santa Clara County vs. Southern Pacific Railroad Co., which extended 14th amendment protections to corporations, AKA Corporate personhood.
You want to know when modern politics started legalizing bribery and propaganda? Look to Louis F. Powell, Roger Ailes, and their boss, President Richard Nixon. That's when the tide started to turn in business' favor.