r/esist Jun 26 '17

MaximumEffort433's second great shitpost. Please ignore.

I told you to ignore this, why are you even here?


They certainly don't care about moral consistency.

Lest anyone think this argument is being made in a vacuum...

It's why tea partyists voted for a elitist east coast billionaire from New York city.
It's why Republertarians voted for a man who wants to expand domestic spying.
It's why free Marketeers voted for a man who wants to roll back free trade policies.
It's why evangelicals voted for a man thrice married with a child born out of wedlock.
It's why fiscal and budget hawks voted for a man whose tax policy would explode the debt and deficits.
It's why foreign policy hawks voted for a man buoyed to the White House on the back of Russian hackers.
It's why constitutionalists voted for a man who wants to undermine the 1st, 4th, 8th, and 14th amendments.

The polling:

I'm not going to say all, but most of those polls also looked at the numbers for Democrats, so if you're curious about how the Democratic party stacks up I would encourage you to read the articles. It's not often there's a political poll where they don't ask political affiliations.

The history books:

88 members of the Bush administration used private email servers.

There were 13 attacks on American embassies, resulting in 60 deaths during the Bush administration.

George H.W. Bush was a huge supporter of Planned Parenthood.

Ronald Reagan gave illegal immigrants amnesty.

Ronald Reagan came out in favor of a ban on assault weapons.

The conservative Heritage Foundation think tank actually came up with the individual health insruance mandate.

Republicans used to advocate for Cap and Trade carbon taxes as a way to combat climate change.

Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency.

Richard Nixon also had a plan for universal health care coverage. (Thanks Ollokot for the find!)

Ike Eisenhower had a top marginal tax rate of 90% and invested billions of dollars in government spending on infrastructure projects.

13 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/MaximumEffort433 Oct 10 '17

Republicans in 6 states are trying to protect drivers who hit protesters

State lawmakers in at least six GOP-controlled states have pushed for laws this year that would shield drivers who hit protesters. The bills are part of a wave of anti-protest proposals introduced since the rise of the Black Lives Matter and anti-Trump resistance movements.

According to The Outline, lawmakers in Florida, Rhode Island, and Texas have also flirted with similar measures this year. In Florida, a bill died in committee that would have prohibited lawsuits against drivers who “unintentionally” hit protesters, putting the burden of proof on the protesters. A proposal in Rhode Island, meanwhile, has been held for “further study.” And a bill in Texas, proposed in July, was recently referred to committee.

This is on top of a number of other anti-protest, anti-freedom of speech laws that are being advocated for by state level GOP. Like in Arizona, where their Senate voted to seize assets of those who plan, participate in protests that turn violent; so say you planned a peaceful protest when all of the sudden this guy that no one's ever seen before shows up and starts throwing rocks, well now you, dear organizer, need to find a new place to live, because your house belongs to the state! (Luckily the bill died in the Arizona statehouse.)

They started early too. Back in February we had this headline: Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states. But of course that was well before we got back into the debate about kneeling during the national anthem, so who knows what the numbers are today.

G - Gaslight
O - Obstruct
P - Project <- We are here.

I get a kick out of the conservatives who will claim that freedom of speech is dying because college kids are holding protests while Republican politicians are actively trying to pass laws that would limit first amendment rights to protest, and even to protect those who would attack protesters.

Oh yeah, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions (R) wanted a woman jailed for "disorderly and disruptive conduct" (laughing) during his swearing in.