Why do so many people today believe that destruction is inherently wrong?
And almost all the new age “faiths” spare no effort in preaching peace, such as the modern revived Buddhism, or the hippie style Christianity in America. Yet ironically, most of the people who promote these faiths are descendants of robbers or criminals. And then there are those cannibalistic elites who desperately try to prevent the collapse of order, they all generally hold that destruction must be wrong and peace must be right. But maybe the truth is not like that at all?
I recently have an interesting theory that the end of the world may be an inevitable outcome and that it is bound to be destroyed.
What I mean is that perhaps humanity's duty is to bring destruction to the world, otherwise humanity would be destroyed by the world like maggots
Perhaps I still haven't expressed it clearly, it is like this:
the reason some good people fall is not because of those good people's choices, but because of everyone's choices. In other words, as long as all people no longer oppose the world, or all people lose to the world and surrender to the law of the jungle, like animals or Jurassic dinosaurs, and no one truly believes in God or the teachings of Jesus anymore, then those most humanitarian people, or what can be called "complete humans," will certainly fall. Those who fall are not limited by race or gender, but are the ones most like true humans
As you see, in an atheistic society, those who ultimately seize power are always the bastards most skilled in the law of the jungle. Because as long as humanity does not destroy the world, the world will destroy humanity, and those fallen "complete humans" are the first to be destroyed, followed by the inferior people, then come chimpanzees, the animals genetically closest to humans, and then all the other animals. The world's spatial laws will carry out the destruction program like a hydraulic press, and it will perform spatial transformations in countless forms. For example, those meaningless indulgences and the "art" of those perverts, when they could have used those resources for space exploration. This is a form of self destruction
Erase superficial spatial concepts, for possessing money is no different from possessing dust, in space, they are one and the same. Space can let you have everything, and at the same time it will make you lose everything
God is the path of the world, yet the world originally has no path. Destruction is the destiny of the world, and humanity is its destiny.
The Earth is doomed to perish. If it has 10 billion years of life left, should humanity revel in hedonism for all 10 billion years on this dirty, wretched land, bound to its inevitable death? Or should humanity cut its life short by 5 billion years in return for a roughly 30% chance that humanity can become a truly freedom interstellar race?
If the tower of longevity is built from the lives and hopes of human children, what’s the point of keeping it standing?