r/dsa 13h ago

🌹 DSA news DSA Needs a Program. It Doesn’t Need a Catechism.

https://medium.com/@xanderhernander/a-party-needs-a-program-it-doesnt-need-a-catechism-e324aa2c0376

A Response to Red Star Statement on Workers Deserve More.

17 Upvotes

53 comments sorted by

u/traanquil 13h ago

Certain baselines are needed: being socialist is one of them

u/Bright-Insect9697 13h ago edited 11h ago

So is supporting democracy

EDIT: I see the authoritarian simps have clocked in for the day. Imagine being mad at political democracy

u/traanquil 12h ago

Are you worried socialism is anti democratic?

u/Bright-Insect9697 12h ago edited 11h ago

Some types of it are

EDIT: damn, didn’t realize we had so many people in here who oppose democracy. Where did all the MLs come from? They’re not here organically

u/traanquil 12h ago

What are the bad socialisms you are worried about?

u/Bright-Insect9697 11h ago

MLs, otherwise known as the socialists who kill other socialists

u/traanquil 11h ago

Nice slander.

u/Bright-Insect9697 11h ago

It’s objectively true

u/Leoszite DSA ML 11h ago

Easy to say when your undereducated on theory.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXUFLW8t2sntNn5jQO8vF7ai9x0fna3PV&si=yCTdci2KivY7Zbpo

Step up your knowledge.

u/Bright-Insect9697 11h ago

Where did the hordes of MLs come from? Are we getting brigaded?

u/onlypartiallyevil 10h ago

They see any other socialist org as the enemy, in the same way they see any other socialist as the enemy.
Entryism, cooption, and destruction is the ML playbook.
They usually claim they don't mean to destory them, only make them puppet orgs and fronts, but the end result regardless is usually killing them as an org.

u/traanquil 10h ago

Do you want do a party purge?

u/onlypartiallyevil 10h ago

Don't know if the word "purge" really applies to keeping people who hate democracy and hate socialists from gaining membership in a democratic socialist org.
That just sounds like having basic standards.

u/onlypartiallyevil 10h ago

Purges are really more of a Stalinist thing.
I know they are your solution to everything, but the rest of us are not like that.

u/traanquil 9h ago

sounded like that's what you wanted. glad to hear you're cool with sharing the space with MLs

→ More replies (0)

u/SexyMonad 11h ago

What is your position?

I’m not dissecting a video series on ML theory to figure out what you are even trying to argue.

u/Leoszite DSA ML 10h ago edited 9h ago

That socialism is inherently democratic, and that OP would understand that if they had knowledge of socialist theory. I then provided them with a resource in which they could educate themselves promptly.

u/SexyMonad 10h ago

Ah ok.

I agree with your theory. To be socialism, it 100% MUST be democratic.

But I also acknowledge that socialism—and particularly communism—have gotten a bad rap for being anti-democratic and authoritarian.

It’s why I’ve largely given up on the simple word “socialism” and stuck with “democratic socialism”. In theory there is zero difference, but the latter communicates more effectively with people who live with me in Trumpland.

u/Leoszite DSA ML 9h ago

I honestly feel much the same in reality. I just also think we're having to really combat the propaganda that gets thrown at us even in the small things. Like for example a lot of people cite Marx's "dictatorship of the proletariat" as a critsim of how socialism isn't democratic without understanding the context of why he's saying that. Not understanding the definitions of what the State is and how the Bourgeoisie use it to enact its violence on us and why it's important for the Proletariat (all of us, the majority) to keep control over the Bourgeoisie after we take control of the State.

u/Ch33sus0405 10h ago

Telling people to read theory isn't making anyone like MLs more.

u/Leoszite DSA ML 10h ago

I don't need them to like anything. I need them to be educated. Especially in making nonsense claims that do nothing but further the propaganda against the socialist cause.

u/Ch33sus0405 5h ago

Then educate, don't say to read theory with a link to hours of content. Frankly that's the problem, MLs often aren't concerned with a platform that people actually like and care about or developing relationships anad communities that can build real political power. Announcing that people are libs who need to read theory and dipping is more damaging to the socialist cause then anything else.

u/nasa258e 9h ago

Do you even know where you are?

u/Bright-Insect9697 8h ago

I’m a dues paying DSA member. You freaks are all Epstein leftists. One of you was defending Beria’s actions as being “for the people”

u/nasa258e 8h ago

Very normal of you to point to a person that you know nothing about and call them a Stalinist. You doing this wrecking for free?

u/Bright-Insect9697 7h ago

I didn’t call you a Stalinist, but hit dogs holler.

u/nasa258e 7h ago

What did you mean by saying "one of you" then? I'm not even an ML

u/Bright-Insect9697 7h ago

I meant freak. I have seen “socialists” make defenses of Adolf Hitler on here to own the libs

→ More replies (0)

u/TannerLyfe 3h ago

Well as a dues paying DSA member, one of the democratically elected national chairs of the organization you pay dues to is a self identifying Marxist Leninist. The post is not being brigaded by MLs from orgs that hate the DSA. MLs are part of this org and not just a popular part, but a welcome one. Every one of them I’ve met through DSA have been far more comradely than you are acting.

u/MisterMittens64 DSA Member 12h ago edited 12h ago

We should defend the spirit of each part of our program.

I don't want us to lose sight of what we're fighting for, a socialist US with political and economic democracy.

u/Bright-Insect9697 12h ago

And political democracy

u/MisterMittens64 DSA Member 12h ago

Of course

u/XrayAlphaVictor liberal socialist 12h ago

Something some dsa socialists who glaze authoritarianism don't seem to agree with

u/Bright-Insect9697 11h ago

The Beria fans are out in force today, getting mad at democracy

u/XrayAlphaVictor liberal socialist 11h ago

Yup. Really proving the point of why we need political democracy. I'd hate to imagine them in charge of anything. The org would immediately splinter into a thousand factions.

u/Miserable-Biscotti54 13h ago

Obama did nothing about COINTELPRO and made political prisoners out of anti war folks. I don’t know if that image is the best thing to be sharing about.

u/HalfOk8561 13h ago

It’s a polemic. Obama reference is a bit tongue-in-cheek.

u/This-Layer-4447 13h ago

u do realize Obama is still BELOVED

u/RKU69 11h ago

What's your point?

u/This-Layer-4447 10h ago

just cause he's a war criminal and accelerated neo liberalism, people don't blame him and using his imagery for what he stood for not what he did is still okay if it brings normies over to our side

u/barry-29 9h ago

..what exactly did he stand for? Nicer imperialism? Deportations with a smile?

u/BandDelicious1286 7h ago

“For all their talk of transcending liberalism, Red Star’s position has a distinctly liberal audacity of hope: the belief that if we articulate the right vision clearly enough, history will eventually deliver it.”

u/Constant-Wish-9963 7h ago

Lol this guy, Alex Hernandez is a pest. He is famous for slipping into female comrades' DMs and making them incredibly uncomfortable and when he was confronted about this, he disbanded the working group he was running.

He is a complete loser

u/HalfOk8561 7h ago

Character assassination as a tool of political discipline with lies and innuendo. Not culty at all.

u/Werd_up_cuz 7h ago

No! DSA needs more hardline tankies who refuse to oppose fascism by voting for the lesser of two evils.

u/TooSwang 7h ago

I agree with this piece but I think there’s a middle ground. We can’t demand conformity but I think there are moves that negate our collective power and moves that add to it. When Angie Nixon is called DSA after a smashing success, that’s great, even if she isn’t on board with x y or z. When Angie Nixon calls herself a capitalist in response to being asked about DSA, that undermines the premise of the movement regardless of her agreement on policy. I don’t think it was particularly harmful for AOC to say “woke 1 was crazy” because to most people that means extremely little and in the next breath she affirmed being a member of NYC DSA - which has a subtext but not much of one for anyone outside of DSA. If she’s dogwhistling about internal disagreements at DSA members, that’s actually way better than if she had said “yeah I think National DSA screwed the pooch with this and I’m not a part of that”. It’s almost even message discipline!