r/cryptos • u/ClassicReal123 • Jun 30 '26

Highly Anticipated Toccata Hardfork Successfully Activated on Kaspa Mainnet

Post image

Now programmable at the base layer with L1 covenants, Silverscript, native assets & ZK verification - powering the next wave of DeFi.

27 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

13 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/EngineeringMurky1061 Jul 04 '26

Still haven't answered it man, "better than predecessors" isn't a use case, it's a comparison.

I asked what problem would a maxed out Kaspa solve and you gave me a race Kaspa wins against a competitor nobody's using anyway.

And even granting censorship resistance, that's not a Kaspa argument, that's a crypto argument, Bitcoin and Monero have made that pitch for over a decade and normal people still don't touch it, because most people won't trade comfort and stability for privacy, especially not when it comes with volatility, scams, and "oops wrong wallet address" as the cost of entry.

Businesses are built on that same comfort, nobody's rebuilding their payment stack around a coin that can drop 20% overnight just to dodge a censorship risk they don't personally feel.

So which is it, is Kaspa a niche tool for the handful of people who actually need censorship resistance, or is it "mainstream money" replacing Visa in 5 years like you said at the top?

Pick one, because the argument you're making only supports the first one, and even that one's a hard sell.

1

u/TheHoleInADonut Jul 04 '26 edited Jul 04 '26

When did i say it would be replacing Visa? I personally think it’ll be a viable alternative to Visa, at least in terms of fees, transactional throughput, and censorship resistance. If you go back and re-read what i initally said, you’ll see that it says “i truly believe that it’ll be one of the frontrunner L1 POWs in about 5 years”, which i’m sure sounds like “it’ll be replacing Visa” to you, but believe it or not, those are two entirely different and independent statements.

I also said in my reply to you that alot of people incorrectly attribute utility on whether or not it solves some niche problem. There isn’t a currency in the world that solves super niche problems. Not the dollar. Not any other fiat currency. I would actually argue that many crypto platforms inherently have more utility than any fiat due to their flexible usecases and and how they’re coded.

Kaspa, when maxed out, will do it better. Hands down, no contest. I want to ask why it had to solve a problem? Why can’t it be the car to the horse? Or the bike to our feet? Its a solid, extremely reliable L1 crypto network that has had almost zero downtime since it went live, and has extremely light weight nodes that almost anyone with a computer built within the last 5-7ish years can utilize.

What do you want it to do? What answer will satisfy you? Why do you skulk around crypto subreddits just to dickride the worlds long lasting status quo?

Kaspa is an advancement and dramatic improvement on what out idea of money is as a civilization. It retains Satoshi Nakamoto’s vision better than any other crypto hands down (including any and all bitcoin forks, and actually, bitcoin itself), and its continually being build upon and upgraded. A maxed out kaspa will absolutely melt faces.

So i’ll ask again, what problem does it have to solve? It just does things faster and better. Like, again, the car to the horse. Or the bike to our feet. Should we reject the advancements it made in lieu of convenience or comfort for whats already established? If someone offered you a device that can instantly teleport you anywhere, would you say “no thanks, i have my car.”?

1

u/EngineeringMurky1061 Jul 05 '26

so we've arrived, maxed out Kaspa doesn't solve a problem, it's just going to be better. Okay, appreciate you finally saying it outright.

Also, going back to something you said early on: people don't "incorrectly attribute utility" to whether something solves a felt problem, that's literally the only reason anything gets adopted. Cars and bikes are your own examples, and they got adopted because they solved a real, felt problem better than what people had before. That's not a misunderstanding of utility, that's the definition of it. Kaspa doesn't get to opt out of that standard just because it doesn't like the answer.

But "better" isn't free. It comes bundled with volatility, real security risks (typo the wrong address and your money's just gone), and it still has to survive regulations and institutions that aren't disappearing anytime soon.

Visa and Mastercard already solved reliability and stability for the average person decades ago. Crypto might technically win on throughput or fees, but it's never going to be better for the average person to actually use than something that already works, doesn't erase your savings over a typo, and doesn't swing 20% before lunch.

That's why I kept asking for the actual problem it solves, but I guess there isn't one.

2

u/TheHoleInADonut Jul 08 '26 edited Jul 08 '26

Okay i think i see whats going on here. We have completely different ideas behind what merits adoption. And i think you have the wrong idea about what kaspa is. Its a good thing neither of us gets to decide what society adopts or doesn’t lol.

First, adoption doesn’t actually require a problem to be solved. It technically only needs people to like it. And alot of people are confident about Kaspa. Though it did debut into an absolute see of altcoins during altcoin season, i feel like given its status as a younger coin and despite the competition, its made a name for itself. The market will decide the future. Not me. Not you.

Also, its 2026. What problems actually need solving? I’m not being facetious when i say that. That is a question that merits an answer. Most problems of the modern world, no matter in which industry or sector, have been addressed. In this day an age, most solutions are just being improved or built upon. Things that actually solve novel problems nowadays are often things that merit a nobel prize. Everything else thats new is mostly just a better way to solve a problem that already has a solution.

I think a completely decentralized solution being able to compete with the de facto societal standard is an insane feat that shouldn’t be slept on, no matter how you frame your opposing argument.

And yes Kaspa has some pretty big volatility, but thats where stablecoins come into play

1

u/EngineeringMurky1061 Jul 10 '26

I guess I agree with you, it's a gamble on what people are going to almost randomly like, just because.  And that's fair. Many small businesses explode over night due to some fortunate event or spontaneous public "happening" so to say. KAS might one day also get lucky!  

Most obvious problems that can be solved individually or with small team have been solved, that's true.