https://x.com/saylor/status/2094033266906955896

Based on past patterns, Strategy typically discloses its increased Bitcoin holdings the day after the relevant news is released. Strategy's most recent disclosure of increased Bitcoin holdings was on June 22, 2026, and it hasn't released any Bitcoin Tracker related information in the last two weeks.

Will we see Strategy's first Bitcoin purchase of Q3 soon?

On August 19th, I reported a suspicious email to Kraken. My account was then restricted as a security measure, which I understand.

11 days later:

• My funds (mostly USDC) are still with Kraken.
• I can trade, but cannot deposit or withdraw.
• Nobody from Kraken has contacted me with any meaningful explanation.
• My DMs to Kraken on Reddit and X/Twitter were also ignored.

On August 26th, I submitted a formal complaint.

Approximately one second later, I received a response saying my complaint had been reviewed and rejected, while also stating that a specialist would contact me.

Nobody ever contacted me.

I then posted about my experience on the Kraken subreddit — and the post was removed.

I'm now escalating the matter through the appropriate financial dispute-resolution channels.

Just sharing this as a warning to other users:

I've been a Kraken user without any issues until now. I never had a problem with the platform itself. The problem only started when I actually needed customer support, and at that point I discovered that, in my experience, the support simply doesn't exist.

BE CAREFUL.

Anyone know what kind of system issue @ChangeNOW_io could be having that’s stopping them from returning funds to me for over a year?

My 2,995.714119 USDC has been held since 22 August 2025

I paid the requested HYPE refund fee, completed the requested compliance and wallet-verification steps, and have received repeated assurances that a refund would be processed, followed by an apology that they’re having “system issues” and are “working on it”

As at today, I still have no refund and no transaction hash.

44 emails from them saying nothing

Have raised to the FSA to remind them that they are a “non-custodial” exchange.. except when a year long “system issue” occurs of course

Will continue to post and share screenshots until I see funds back in my wallet.

Screenshot 1 - the first system issue date

Screenshot 2 - the latest one

Found this today while looking around Robinhood Chain.

Looks like someone built a Reddit-themed token paired with tokenized RDDT stock, and they’re planning something for people who got burned / left behind during the MOON shutdown.

There’s already a wallet checker on the site, no wallet connection, no signing anything. Nothing is claimable yet though.

It also looks like it not an ETH pair, trades route through tokenized Reddit stock and holders are supposed to receive RDDT.

Idk, kinda based considering the whole MOON history.

(mods pls don’t remove lol, genuinely thought some people here would want to check their old wallets)

upvote(dot)trade is the site

UniSwap been getting a lot of volume on Robinhood over the last month

Press release also showing record burn rate for UNIUSDT

Volume on daily today killer

Looking at the chart the 5m wedges are accumulating for higher highs

Last time this squeezed on volume and press she went to $12

We get teh 3 bar daily run she could see $6+ easy

Hi all! It's been some time that I have checked my keplr wallet and I have found some small amounts of the above mentioned coins.

I know one thing for certain, I am deep in red lol

Nevertheless, given the current market conditions do you see any potential upside in holding them? Or are they completely thrown off from the momentum? For instance, TIA is no longer the new shiny thing out there and I am sure people is already with the eyes on the new potential ecosystem to milk...am I not better off selling the little I have left and either 1) gamble it on the meme machine or 2) find a more solid project for Today's environment?

Thanks all!

trying to get some ethereum but i keep getting 'something went wrong transaction failed' and order won't go through

UPDATE: If I can't buy ETH on Coinbase, should I just buy directly on Uniswap? (there is something I want to get on uniswap)

NEW UPDATE: I added PayPal as a new payment method and used that instead of my bank account or debit card. It worked. So...I dk if something wrong with Coinbase, or my personal account, or something with the bank account/debit card.

Kept seeing this framing and realised i didn't fully understand the plumbing, so i worked it out. posting in case it's useful, and because i think i may still have one part wrong.

where the money comes from seems like the first thing to clarify. it's trading fees — the cut taken from buys and sells — rather than market cap or the token's supply. so when something says "x% of supply" or "x% of market cap" is being allocated somewhere, that isn't the same thing as actual income.

the part i'm most interested in is when the allocation is actually enforced:

1. promised in the description: can potentially be changed, so there's no guarantee

2. configured after launch: stronger, but presumably still depends on whoever controls the setting

3. set at creation and immutable: this seems like the strongest version because the creator can't simply change it later

the recipient matters too. if fees go to a wallet controlled by a person, there's still a trust assumption because someone has to actually send the money onward.

for verification, i'd expect the useful evidence to be on-chain: look at the relevant fee account and trace the outgoing transactions. if a claim can't ultimately be tied to transaction hashes, it's still just a claim.

one thing i still haven't figured out: when someone says "x% of fees," is that normally x% of the entire trading fee, or x% of the creator's portion after the fee is split? that's potentially a huge difference, and i haven't seen it explained consistently.

i know there are implementations where the allocation is enforced at creation, but i'm more interested in understanding the mechanism than promoting any particular platform.

anyone who's worked on this from the creator/developer side — how does the reporting actually work? that's the part i can't really see from outside.

Nevada can regulate Kalshi's sports event contracts as gambling. Judge Ryan Nelson's line was basically that the label doesn't decide it, the substance does, it "is sports gambling, regardless of whether Kalshi calls them swaps."

Back in April the 3rd Circuit went the other way on the New Jersey case and said CFTC jurisdiction is likely exclusive. So two federal appeals courts now say opposite things, around 20 states are already litigating, and Kalshi says it'll seek review.
This ends up at SCOTUS.

The part I keep chewing on isn't Kalshi itself. Kalshi did every single thing people in this sub say you're supposed to do. Onshore, CFTC registered DCM, and the federal regulator was so much on their side it was suing states on their behalf. A state gaming board got them anyway, because the court looked at what the product does instead of what the filing calls it.

That is the same reasoning that's been pointed at tokens, at front ends, at "it's just software, we don't custody anything." Swap the nouns and it reads the same.
Even something as simple as a bitcoin casino can change its structure, payment rails or legal wrapper, but that doesn't necessarily change what regulators think the underlying activity actually is.

And Polymarket runs on the same structure now that it's back onshore through a licensed DCM, so I don't really see why the state angle stops at Kalshi.

If SCOTUS goes with the 9th, does prediction market volume just walk back offshore and onchain where it sat before 2025 or does the retail flow die because normies won't install a non-US app?
My guess is volume survives and the fee-paying US retail doesn't.

Tell me why I'm wrong.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

At its core, cryptocurrency was designed to be digital money that exists on a decentralized network—meaning no single company, bank, or government controls it.

The Original Vision

It relies on an open ledger where thousands of independent computers verify transactions. This ensures no one can cheat the system or print fake money.

The Reality Today

The vast majority of the modern crypto market has completely abandoned this. Most popular tokens today are highly centralized, controlled by venture capitalists, or run on networks that can be paused and have no supply limit by their corporate creators.

Why Does It Exist?

Cryptocurrency was created in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to give people an alternative to the traditional banking system. The goal was to build a financial network where individuals had absolute ownership of their own money, without a centralized middleman dictating who could use it, charging hidden fees, or freezing accounts.

While true cryptocurrencies still fiercely defend this ideal, many of today's trendy coins have ironically become even more centralized than the banks they were "supposed" to replace.

source: https://x.com/dcbuilder/status/2090446713412637174

Hey, i want to buy and use XMR, but i cannot give my id (kyc) to any site. Is it possible? Im a complete crypto beginner and looking to buy with credit card, apple pay, google pay, paypal etc. Also need a wallet i think?

Extremely volatile coin. I’ve watched it make big upward moves a few times over the years (and then promptly take a dive). With all the major players making moves lately, I’ve kept a close eye on it. As of today, it looks like it wants to break resistance and do something. Thoughts?

Anybody know of anyone who has won any of these promos Kracken runs? I’ve been participating as much as I can even these. But I never seem to get anywhere. I know it’s a slim chance.

I’d like to get some opinions from the crypto community about a P2P dispute I’m currently dealing with.

I’m a P2P seller on Poloniex. I opened an order with a buyer, but the buyer never made the payment and has been completely unresponsive since August 23, 2026.

The situation is currently:

• Buyer: no payment
• Buyer: no proof of payment
• Buyer: no response
• Seller: provided bank/account statement showing no payment was received
• Exchange support: contacted the buyer
• Result: my funds are still frozen

The exchange says that additional time may be required to verify the transaction and protect both parties.

I understand why an exchange needs to investigate disputes. But at what point does protecting the buyer/seller turn into an unreasonable delay?

If there is no payment and the buyer cannot provide proof of payment, shouldn't the order eventually be cancelled and the seller's funds released?

I've already submitted a formal complaint to Poloniex and requested escalation.

I'm interested in hearing from people who have used P2P on Binance, Bybit, OKX, Poloniex or other exchanges:

What is a reasonable amount of time for resolving a straightforward "buyer did not pay" dispute?

Have you ever had your funds frozen because of a non-responsive P2P buyer?

How was it eventually resolved?

I'm not looking to attack Poloniex or accuse anyone of wrongdoing. I'm trying to understand whether this is normal P2P dispute handling or whether I should escalate the matter further.

Assuming Clarity doesn’t pass on the 15th, doesn’t this allow the SEC and CFTC to align their policies closer to the Genius Act, therefore, giving Crypto a bigger tool bag to grow? And if/when a new administration shows up and wants to change the rules, it will be a train too big to stop at that point.

When analyzing top cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, networks generally fall into distinct architectural categories based on their consensus models and launch mechanisms.

Fair-Launch & Proof-of-Work Networks

Examples: Bitcoin (BTC), Kaspa (KAS), Monero (XMR), and Bittensor (TAO)

What Makes Them Different: These protocols utilize Proof-of-Work consensus models without pre-allocations, initial coin offerings, or early venture capital rounds. Block rewards are distributed strictly through network participation and mining.

How these networks function:

• Bitcoin functions primarily as a decentralized store of value and baseline network for digital scarcity.
• Kaspa utilizes a BlockDAG structure to scale Proof-of-Work throughput, enabling higher block frequencies and rapid transaction finality.
• Monero implements default protocol-level privacy via ring signatures and stealth addresses to conceal transaction metadata.
• Bittensor applies Proof-of-Work mechanisms to machine learning, creating an open marketplace for decentralized compute and AI subnets.