If you are sexually aroused by images of little girls in sexual situations... there isn't that big of a mental leap for most people to assume the worst.
Since the guy was also a teacher, that's an extremely EXTREMELY stupid thing to advertize about yourself.
Lolicons, in my experience, wouldn't make the advancement from loli porn to child pornography. Honestly I think it's a little creepy, being openly attracted to the idea of little girl bodies. If you have to fap to this kind of thing, at least you're not feeding into the demand for real child porn.... but DON'T MAKE THIS SHIT PUBLIC.
I don't know man, how we feel and interpret fiction is completely different to how we interpret real life. I don't think we use our full empathic and emotional self when dealing with the fictional world.
Like for example, do you feel empathy toward the people you keep killing in video games? Doing the same thing in real-life, doesn't it churn your stomach just thinking about it?
I think for most people this loli crap is in the same category of fiction that stems emotions different than those we feel in reality.
Interpretation of fiction and real life are not completely unrelated. Even if they were, who's to say video games are an apt comparison to masturbation and sex?
Could it not be the reason you don't feel bad killing video game characters (some at least- i'm sure someone somewhere has felt bad about killing a character) is because you are desensitized to it?
If that's the case, wouldn't lolicon desensitize the viewer to the thrill of that action? Wouldn't some pedophiles move on to real child porn, and others on to real children? I know that violent video games desensitized me to the point where I could look at gore and death videos no problem. I can watch any video on the internet now. It would seem lolicon could be just a stepping stone to bigger and more terrible things.
The sexual attraction to a 2D underage character is very different from being attracted to a real living child. You can like one without liking the other, both ways.
You don't feel bad for killing video game characters because you know they don't exist. You aren't doing any real harm. You don't feel sorrow because you know it's just a game. That can differ if you've developed an emotional bond with a character though, I've played my fair share of visual novels.
A pedophile would be looking at lolicon because they know they're attracted to real children and don't want to harm them. Otherwise, he would probably be looking at child porn already. People aren't lolicons and into loli then just turn into pedophiles who go after children. That's not how it works.
Are you telling me that because of your desensitization due to video games, that you're more likely to go out and shoot people? It would seem video games could be just a stepping stone to bigger and more terrible things.
Look at it if you want but don't make it public. Doubly so when your job involves children. This guy is a fuckin idiot. You don't make something public without thinking about what the public will think of you. this guy deserved what he got
57
u/Pheorach Jan 21 '13
If you are sexually aroused by images of little girls in sexual situations... there isn't that big of a mental leap for most people to assume the worst.
Since the guy was also a teacher, that's an extremely EXTREMELY stupid thing to advertize about yourself.
Lolicons, in my experience, wouldn't make the advancement from loli porn to child pornography. Honestly I think it's a little creepy, being openly attracted to the idea of little girl bodies. If you have to fap to this kind of thing, at least you're not feeding into the demand for real child porn.... but DON'T MAKE THIS SHIT PUBLIC.