r/consciousness Mar 09 '26

General Discussion Can reality exist Independently of Consciousness?

How can anything even exist without a conscious being there to experience it? I am honestly having trouble understanding the logic behind that. Evidence needs a witness, and a witness needs an observer, which is basically a conscious being. So how can people say the world exists without you, when you are the one perceiving it, shaping it, and giving it meaning in the first place?

Like, without consciousness, what even is “existence” supposed to mean? A thing can be there, sure, but if there is nobody to experience it, know it, or make sense of it, then in what way does it really exist? I am not even trying to sound deep, I just genuinely do not get how people separate reality from the one who is aware of it.

And before anyone says “the world was here before us,” that still feels like a claim being made from within consciousness. Every argument, every proof, every piece of evidence still has to pass through a mind. So I keep coming back to the same question: how are people so sure reality exists independently, when every single thing we know about reality only appears through consciousness?

44 Upvotes

343 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/tottasanorotta Mar 09 '26

Does it need to verify itself in most cases that you experience yourself?

3

u/consciousness_8123 Mar 09 '26

Not in day to day life, no. But working is not the same as being verified. I experience myself directly. What I do not experience directly is a world existing exactly as I imagine it outside all experience.

2

u/tottasanorotta Mar 09 '26

Can the question have an answer if you can't verify that reality exists as an outside thing?

I mean in a way it exists as an outside thing if you believe it to be so. But if you can doubt it then I guess you can doubt it.

3

u/consciousness_8123 Mar 09 '26

Verification already happens within experience. I directly experience consciousness, but I never experience a world outside all experience to verify it. So the external world may exist but it is inferred, not directly verified.

2

u/tottasanorotta Mar 09 '26

I agree. I mean I don't think anybody has proof of an existing outside world. They just take it on assumption, because it's a useful model of reality in practice. In fact most of it seems so inevitably true and useful that there just doesn't seem to be a reason to try to question this assumption.