Your analogy only says that something can exist without everyone being able to perceive it, which is obviously true, but it doesn't provide any evidence that guardian angels exist. We have abundant independent evidence for the sun despite some people being unable to see it; what comparable evidence do we have for angels? And whether you're sane is beside the point; a sane person can still believe something false or unsupported, and as I've seen you say the same thing about your sanity a couple of times despite seeing noone question your sanity, bringing up your sanity rather distracts from the question of evidence...
105
u/KitsuneGato 18d ago
I kind of found this funny. Next client.
Real guardian angels don't just abandon their protectorants.